Posted on 05/04/2012 6:31:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Ever notice how much more intelligent you get, the farther left you move? Commonly known as intellectual growth, especially if you abandon Christianity and embrace homosexuality.
—We are now in the bargaining stage of the destruction of the Constitution, and the GOPe is at the front of the pack.—
And this is why I think there is no political solution. We are about to live Dr. Zivago, but with less snow.
I think we’re also about to live Ezekiel 39. Personally, I’m already in Revelation 18:4, for all the good it will do me.
Ever cross your mind that the reason they don't is because they agree with him? If they don't agree with him, how could you tell?
Newt lost because Romney pointed out that he was against capitalism....
True story, Rush and Ari: During WWII when Japanese Americans were interned, many long-time Japanese farmers were put in the position of having to let their farmland go.
Unsung, unheralded generally by their own preference because they were modest, humble GOOD men and capitalists all doing this because IT WAS THE RIGHT AND MORAL THING TO DO, took responsibility for those Japanese farmers' operations, though they were their direct competitiors; these GOOD capitalists kept those farms running for the duration of the war so when those Japanese farmer friends and neighbors returned, they had their land and farming operations intact and waiting for them. I know this is true and that it happened because I personally know people -- Japanese-American and non-Japanese American -- who lived it.
In fact, when the niece of one of those now-gone farmers was in the hospital not so long ago with a very dangerous medical condition and a Japanese-American doctor at that hospital saw her chart and discussed it with his brother, another doctor, he quitely inquired: "Do you know who this is?" And that woman received even better special care and treatment than normal because those two knew that a major reason their parents had been able to send them to medical school, was because of the GOODNESS of her ENTIRELY CAPTALIST uncle, and indeed that uncle was only one of MANY excellent, principled CAPITALISTS who understood so well that pursuing capitalism doesn't justify doing immoral things.
A ROMNEY "capitalist" farmer at that time would have done (and sad to say, many did) what would have been perfectly acceptable in a capitalist system: bought the land at cut-rate prices and kept it for their own profit. It would have been perfect practice of capitalism, totally legal. BUT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WRONG. Having read somewhat in-depth elsewhere about real mechanisms of what some have called "vulture capitalism" of the type Romney practiced at Bain, when Rush very stupidly and destructively criticized Newt's criticism of Romney at Bain as being "anti-capitalist," was very much in spirit THE SAME THING as criticizing those GOOD farmers for doing the right thing and accusing them of being "anti-capitalist" when those GOOD farmers disdained and ostracized their MAMMON-WORSHIPPING "capitalist" colleagues who took stinking "legal" advantage of their interned Japanese-American competitors.
When Rush so totally and disturbingly jumped on the "Newt's an anti-capitalist because he criticized Romney" bandwagon, he burned a bridge that he will have a hard time rebuilding with me. He proved himself shallow to the point of being amoral (as opposed to immoral).
The next time you think about accusing Newt of being an "anti-capitalist," you HAD BETTER REMEMBER that you will be in spirit also criticizing as "anti-capitalist" those GOOD CAPITALIST CALIFORNIA FARMERS who held in righteous contempt other farmers who practiced a particular, legal, and very low form of capitalism and destroyed some excellent Japanese-American farms.
He hideth my Soul
IN the Cleft of the Rock And Covereth me with His hand.
No need to run He has us covered.
It's still, as you can see, a real sore spot with me about Rush. Rush is mostly right, but when he's wrong -- as he was about the "anti-capitalist Newt" charge, he's REALLY REALLY AND DESTRUCTIVELY wrong.
—Ever cross your mind that the reason they don’t is because they agree with him?—
Not only has it crossed my mind, but I think it is at least partly true. It is one reason I say there is no political solution to our current dilemma. The other reason is that I think we are so far gone that the founding fathers themselves could return from the grave and still not get us out of this mess. It is too late. the die is cast. The ship has hit the iceberg and is dead in the water. The flooding has reached C deck. Etc...
But He tells us to.
It sort of reminds me of the old joke about the Christian in a flood. He prayed to God to save him.
So the water gets to his porch and a rowboat comes by to save him and he says “The Lord will save me.” Then its up to the second story and a large boat comes by and he pushes them away and says, “The Lord will save me.” Finally he is teetering on the top of his chimney surrounded by water and a helicopter throws down a rope. He pushes it away and says, “The Lord will save me.”
Eventually he is swept away and he drowns. At heaven’s gate he asks the Lord why He didn’t save him. The Lord says, “I sent you two boats and a helicopter.”
Revelation 18:4 says to come out of her. I did.
So here’s the thing - Ron Paul is pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-borders, pro-constitution, pro-small government, pro-defense (an Air Force veteran as well), pro-liberty, and he’s just won his fifth state guaranteeing him a slot on the convention ballot.
Yes, he’s said some things about foreign policy that raise many Republicans’ hackles, but does that trump all his other conservative bonafides? Would you really rather have Romney instead of a rock-ribbed constitutionalist who holds what you consider to be a short-sighted view of foreign policy and military interventionism?
Paul might be persuaded to change his views on foreign policy once he gets the classified CinC briefings, but how likely is it that Romney can be persuaded to change his litany of anti-life, anti-family, anti-liberty views once elected?
Ron Paul is the only candidate left besides Romney in the GOP field. Are we really willing to flush all the Tea Party’s gains, by nominating the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama, over this one issue of a non-interventionist foreign policy?
This is great thinking and strategy. If Romney did this I would think twice about voting for him. Unfortunately, asking Mittens to coalesce with real Conservatives is like asking water to run uphill. I’ll wait until I see it.
Ok - here’s the plan. Pay attention.
We push hard for Mitt to take Palin on as his VP. He caves when he sees how McCain’s numbers went up after naming her, they’re elected with strong senate and representative majorities.
Then with our best opposition research we move to impeach him and we end up with Madame President Palin. And for you ladies, we’ll also have the First Hunk for four years minimum. ;-)
Of course, Mitt probably doesn’t even drink coffee so we might actually have to set up some kind of sting along the lines of the recent secret service antics.
Only problem: We have to push for Palin, hide Romney’s weaknesses and then hammer him just after the election.
To all: Feel free to post if you have a better plan. ;-)
I might disagree with the use of regardless. If Romney wins, it will be in large part because conservatives take him to the dance. He's no fool, he'll recognize that. My guess he'll build his legacy, that's why you run, on economic issues. Social issues, government expansionism, gun rights, there's no upside in flopping his flips. We'll be far better off with Romney than Obama. Returning power to the states, that's always a problem and wouldn't necessarily be hopeful. Though again, there's no upside in opposition.
“We must continue expanding our inroads into the state houses and into every elective office in the land. We must continue building on our majority in the house and we must retake the senate!!”
This is our only hope.
Pssssst! Over here Ansell......
Of course, with my plan we end up with Sarah Palin as president but yours is good too. ;-)
Bump for later
I am sorry to read that. I regret that FR is becoming more like Little Green Footballs.
It is our duty to vote for the lesser of two evils. We can start the next campaign after this one is lost, if it is lost. If we win, we can encourage our friends to hold more conservative positions.
Don’t have an argument with not trusting politicians. No politician is worthy of trust, yet even Obama paid his union and environmentalist wacko supporters back. Support Romney and perhaps he will support the Gun Rights supporters who gave him a chance.
LOL on little green footballs. FR is and will remain a pro-life conservative site, thank you very much!
Well, thank goodness for that!~
This is exactly where the RINOs expected to leave us, with no other choice but to bend over, as they did with Dole, GW and McCan’t. We know where that road leads. It leads to the same kind of selling out of the forgotten men to carry the ever expanding burdens of big government, while the politicians enrich themselves and go on with business as usual doling out favors to their friends and skewing markets for their benefit.
We have accomplished nothing, not even anything close to restoring the extraordinary political work of Ronald Reagan that made the kind of lives we lived from his time up to the crash of mortgage scam possible. It is gone, buried under a layer of RINO guano so think it is out of reach.
Obama didn’t start this, and is not the root cause. His is just the last name on the very long list of politicians that added more to the train of abuses of the forgotten man, and no outcome of 2012 will do anything more than change the names over the doors of power to do so or the inevitable consequences of it. They do not care about us, never have, and will not until we make them care; and that doesn’t just go for the politicians themselves, but the people who are voting these subversives into office in the first place. There is no other way to finally get this over with, and we would not be the first generation to make hard to choices to go full bore into the unknown for the possibility to rid ourselves of the scourges of tyranny, knowing full well what the consequences of no longer capitulating to it mean. With God as my witness, I would gladly go through whatever it takes, if means a possibility to end this madness once and for all. The faster the consequences from what has been done to us come, the better off we will all be, even it means we have the fight of our lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.