Skip to comments.
Orrin Hatch Opponent Dan Liljenquist Supports Raising Taxes (Video)
Conseratives4Palin ^
| Wednesday May 30, 2012
| Steve Fisher
Posted on 05/30/2012 9:44:40 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Dan Liljenquists campaign has stated that he would never label himself a Tea Party candidate, and now we see why.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: danliljenquists; orinhatch; palin; sarahpalin; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
According to Dan he may work with Democrats about possible "Revenue Enhancers" if elected
To: Bigtigermike
2
posted on
05/30/2012 9:47:10 PM PDT
by
Bratch
To: Bratch
To: Bigtigermike
So Sarah Palin was right, again?
4
posted on
05/30/2012 9:50:17 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: Bigtigermike
Lil-jen (or yen?)-kwist.
That’s a light in the loafers name
5
posted on
05/30/2012 9:50:26 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yes she was right and she knows what she’s doing.....those people jumping on her look like fools now
To: Bigtigermike
How many so called “tea party” candidates are really GOPe plants who blow it right before the election?
7
posted on
05/30/2012 9:53:50 PM PDT
by
Terry Mross
("It happened. And we let it happen." Peter Griffin - FAMILY GUY)
To: Bigtigermike
So Sarah Palin gets trashed by some for supporting Hatch yet it turns out his opponent is for raising taxes.Not like Hatch was perfect but he seems to be the lesser of two evils here..Sarah knows what she is doing when she makes endorsements, looks like she was right yet again
To: Bigtigermike
Mark Levin has been solidly behind Hatch and making a passionate, full throated defense for his re-election. His argument is partly that this guy is being called the “Tea Party” candidate without any real proof. And he pointed out this guy was already negotiating away new taxes before he even got to DC.
9
posted on
05/30/2012 10:00:26 PM PDT
by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Bigtigermike
Campaign Killer.
It's surprising that S! may be correct on this race.
10
posted on
05/30/2012 10:01:57 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Sarah Barracuda; Tex-Con-Man
Sarah and Mark are doing great with their endorsements.
11
posted on
05/30/2012 10:05:18 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: Bigtigermike
I guess Dan hasn’t studied history very much.
EVERY tax increase on the American public has been spent supporting larger and larger federal spending.
In addition, these “Grand Bargains” are the reason this once great country is on the verge of collapse...
Decades of “compromise” has got this country on the verge
of collapse.
No thanks Dan. We know where “compromise” leads to.
A bankrupt nation.
To: Jane Long
I wonder if the same people who called Sarah a RINO(Without even looking at the evidence as to WHY she endorsed Hatch) will apologize. Mark Levin is a great voice for Conservatism, even HE supports Hatch, no one bothered to see why, instead just dumping on Sarah like she was the bad guy. I dont always agree with every endorsement she does but I understand why she does it
To: Sarah Barracuda
Someone pointed out that many of those trashing Sarah about the Hatch endorsement on some conservative sites were not Tea Party supporters or even Sarah supporters but were trolls or haters of Palin by their profile where they commented on other sites.....the rest were just ignorant conservatives
To: Bigtigermike
Not sure about other sites since this is the only Conservative site I go on(Other than C4P of course) there were the usual Palin bashers trashing her of course, but were silent when mention of Mark Levin supporting Hatch was mentioned
To: tennmountainman
Another wise choice by Governor Sarah Palin.
She is one smart cookie and unmasked a lot of her critics who are now tied to supporting a tax raiser.
TWB
16
posted on
05/30/2012 10:29:15 PM PDT
by
TWhiteBear
(Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
To: Bigtigermike
Unfortunately there’s a small group of FR zealots who can't get past...
tea party=good
incumbent=bad
Each case is different...in this one, Hatch seems the better of the 2.
17
posted on
05/30/2012 10:29:44 PM PDT
by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Bigtigermike; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
I'm not switching my support to Hatch (he generally votes the right way but he is a old GOP establishment guy who should have left the Senate YEARS ago!), but I've had serious qualms about this Dan Liljenquist guy, and this latest story just confirms it. The comments from the most gung-ho Liljenquist fanboys in Utah are even more troubling. I'm pretty much only supporting Liljenquist because Hatch needs to go, but it's a real hold-your-nose choice. Chaffetz would have been a much better opponent for Hatch. Bottom line: I do NOT trust this guy.
18
posted on
05/30/2012 10:33:46 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And how many freepers were wrong?
19
posted on
05/30/2012 10:36:53 PM PDT
by
woofie
(It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
To: BillyBoy
I do NOT trust this guy. Then, why support him?
You say Hatch "has to go". At the price of electing somebody you don't trust?
And, after this term, won't Hatch be gone anyway?
I confess that I don't understand...
20
posted on
05/30/2012 10:38:01 PM PDT
by
okie01
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson