Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Looks like Breck won't have to worry about being the pretty boy in the slammer.
1 posted on 05/31/2012 1:35:05 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan
and a former staff videographer, Rielle Mellon

Guess the Times can't afford proofreaders anymore.

2 posted on 05/31/2012 1:36:29 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Agents of the Obama-Clinton-Soros-Edwards Machine must have gotten to the jurors.


3 posted on 05/31/2012 1:37:30 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Did he smile and wink at the jury..


4 posted on 05/31/2012 1:38:53 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Looks like the same jury that let Casey Anthony off.

These jury morons probably don’t even have a high school education.


5 posted on 05/31/2012 1:39:22 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

always a ‘good’ sign when jury members are openly flirting with the defendant. lol


6 posted on 05/31/2012 1:40:51 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Didn’t they catch one of the jurors flirting with Silky Pony?


11 posted on 05/31/2012 2:01:18 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Looks like Breck won’t have to worry about being the pretty boy in the slammer.


Instead of “to big to fail” he’s to pretty to jail.


16 posted on 05/31/2012 2:11:33 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Silky Pony rides again. Is Rielle gonna ride him like a Lady Godiva, ehehehe. Taxpayers savings let him go-who cares-—hes done politically.


17 posted on 05/31/2012 2:20:51 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
The funny thing is that his actions were never in question. He did the things he is accused of and nobody denies it.

The question of guilt hinged on whether or not it is legal for a politician to take money for his political campaign and spend it on hushing up his whore.

This jury couldn't decide if that's against the law for a politician.

They should at least have to set up a separate whore-hushing fund, just to maintain an ethical appearance.


21 posted on 05/31/2012 2:30:49 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

For now, until I learn more, let me summarize with the thought that if John Edwards is not found guilty of violation of campaign finance laws, NOBODY EVER WILL!


Maybe no Democrat will.


25 posted on 05/31/2012 2:42:21 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Actually, this is not as bad as it seems.

#1. Another defense will cost him at least another million dollars.

#2. His witnesses are now locked into their testimony, which the DOJ and Fox, etc. will now have months to discredit.

#3. The public hates mistrials. The jury pool will be even more against him next time.

Smart defs cut a deal after a mistrial. Stupid ones get convicted the second time around.

26 posted on 05/31/2012 3:00:13 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

It’s extremely difficult to nail a greasy ‘rat.


28 posted on 05/31/2012 3:11:00 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Dayum. I was kinda hoping he would get to share a cell with Rod Blagojevich — they could do each others’ hair.


30 posted on 05/31/2012 3:19:33 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

As if anyone couldn’t see a mistrial coming what with all the jury antics.


32 posted on 05/31/2012 3:47:50 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Look, John Edwards is lower than the hairs on a centipede's belly. You will get no argument from me on that.

But the law he is accused of breaking is a bad law, a law which no one should be convicted under.

So I'm pretty conflicted here.....

34 posted on 05/31/2012 4:15:13 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Ut veniant omnes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I don’t have a serious problem with this. It would be hard for me to justify an OJ “not guilty” and Edwards getting locked up for some shaky FEC violations. They have done what was needed to do. Go home John.


36 posted on 05/31/2012 5:08:38 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I sure am glad you put this in Breaking News. I might have missed it. Yesterday.


48 posted on 06/01/2012 4:11:42 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson