Posted on 06/03/2012 12:52:39 PM PDT by Salvation
Strong U.S. House majority votes to ban sex-selection abortion
But who are the 168 house members who voted to kill girls rather than boys?
Do they deserve to be re-elected? Especially the women who voted for this?
Ping!
Since it was a roll call vote, aren’t the names now public domain?
“Do they deserve to be re-elected?”
Of course not. I only hope that this is campaign fodder against the members who did. If we’d had a different President, the ban would be signed into law by now.
Mary Bono Mack - CA, Bob Dold - IL, Justin Amish - MI, Charlie Bass - NH, Nan Hayworth - NY, Richard Hanna - NY and good 'ol Ru Paul - TX :(
Just an observation. Connie Mack(R) Florida running for Senator, did not vote; However, his wife Bono Mack(R) voted along with the other 167. Is this not telling or what? LeMiex and MacCalister are looking better in my eyes. Pisses me that they put this guy in to capture the vote and keep saying he is our only hope against Bill Nelson (D). Shows what his character is all about.
Make that NAY - not yea....oops.
Ron Paul voted to kill baby girls. Huh. Some prolifer...
Realistically speaking, how would you prove and enforce it?
Would need a brand new government agency to interpret motive, prosecute, and file paperwork from now to eternity.
Vdare.com has an article about sex selection abortion which is, as I supected tied to the Chinese and Indian communities. China and India place a high premium on sons, so many of their girls are aborted causing an imbalance in the male to female ratio, as a result there are millions fewer females than males in those countries.
I couldn’t help but wonder how what is left of our moral principles may come in conflict with those immigrants who come from other non-Christian parts of the world. It makes you wonder how many other customs are out there from the many countries that do not follow our age old traditions and are now coming into our country in large numbers. What are some of their customs that would conflict with our moral views? Has anyone ever heard of muti? What about honor killings? What about marrying little girls to grown men? I don’t know if the Chinese still practice the binding of girls’ feet, but that was practiced for centuries. What about sutee, the Hindu practice of requiring the widow to throw herself on her husband’s funeral pyre? Is that still done in some places in India, even though it has been outlawed? There have even been cases of some immigrants bringing slaves into the country.
I would have voted no too. Washington is not of right to pass any law on the subject of abortion period. That goes as much for their employees in black robes as congress and excustve feot.
The power is NOT in the Federal constitution, it therefore is not theirs to weld.
Roll Call Vote
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll299.xml
A bill is “defeated” because 168 out of 435 vote against it?
Could someone please explain?
Thanks.
China and India place a high premium on sons, so many of their girls are aborted causing an imbalance in the male to female ratio, as a result there are millions fewer females than males in those countries.I've read travelers accounts of visiting village after village in India and being amazed at how many boys vs girls are visible on the street. Some of it might be due to little boys having more freedom to walk around the village than little girls, but a lot of it is probably because of sex-selective abortions.
Regarding China, the ratio of boys to girls being born has been 6 to 5 for a decade or more. That's in a country of 1.3 billion. That's an incredibly huge imbalance. In China, of course, it's not all be sex-selective abortions, but just plain old sex-selective infanticide... not that there's any difference, morally.
And now Obama and the American Industry of Death wants to bring this horror to America. Not that it's much different than the abortion horror that already exists here. But it does add a new ghoulish dimension to it. Not too ghoulish for Obama and the ghouls at Planned Parenthood... but ghoulish nontheless.
I’m not familiar with these rules. But whatever they are, can’t we just get a plain old majority-wins vote on this? Don’t we control the House?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.