Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Queen homophobic?
Scoop World ^ | Saturday, 2 June 2012 | Peter Tatchell

Posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:31 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: presidio9

Still pretending that their butts are a race, I see.


21 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

That’s gonna leave a mark.


22 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

There’s no “double standard.”


23 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If she is homophobic, that’s great.

Anyne who isn’t is contributing to the Sodomisation of the planet.


24 posted on 06/03/2012 3:17:49 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Not once in her 60-year reign has the Queen publicly acknowledged the existence of the gay [sic] community..."

I could swear I remember her saying something once about an "anus horribilis".

25 posted on 06/03/2012 3:19:55 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

We should be so lucky.


26 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:09 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Brilliant, thank you, copied what you wrote to send out.


27 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:44 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

She’s never waterboarded a kindergarten class either....

Why not ?

< / sarcasm>


28 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:48 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
who cares?

.

29 posted on 06/03/2012 3:22:22 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Her Majesty doesn’t read polls or chase every trend. She stands for traditional values and is a living link to history. She is a wonderful example of how to behave, unlike sleazy politicians that come and go. God Save The Queen.


30 posted on 06/03/2012 3:23:48 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So she’s probably conservative in her social views. Why does everyone in the world have to be on board with “they gay agenda”? It’s ridiculous.


31 posted on 06/03/2012 3:26:48 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I should hope so.


32 posted on 06/03/2012 3:27:07 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (nobody gives me warheads anyway))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What is there about Sodomites that renders them incapable of distinguishing between fear and disgust?


33 posted on 06/03/2012 3:35:47 PM PDT by davius (You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Or is the LGBT group so insecure and needy that they need props CONSTANTLY? Never mind. I just answered my own question.

Right. If this writer wasn't so insecure, because of his own internalization, knowing deep down in his heart and soul that his behavior is not good, he wouldn't constantly demand others to tell him that it is. It the like the old adage from Shakespeare, "He doth protest too much, methinks.".

34 posted on 06/03/2012 3:39:51 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Unlike elected officials and the mass of faceless bureaucrats devoted to trendy social dogma, the Queen doesn’t have to abide by the restrictions of the silly, PC morons who are running the majority of governments around the world.

In other words, she can call ‘em as she sees ‘em.

Or as she would prefer NOT to see ‘em.


35 posted on 06/03/2012 3:40:19 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Although she is a patron of many good causes, none of them are gay or serve the gay community.

Is the person trying to say that the "gay community" doesn't use medical services, fine arts, poverty programs, or anything else the Queen has supported? He probably is, but it's not true.

It's fascinating that "gays" never mention the murderous bigotry of Moslems ... they do know that they're going to die horribly under Shari'a, don't they? Or do they all think - given the actuarial stats on homosexuals - that they'll die of natural causes first?

36 posted on 06/03/2012 3:41:48 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Make sure you notice when I'm being subtly ironic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As the leader of the Church of England she understands God's word and,thus,understands that homosexual acts are contrary,*very much* contrary,to God's law.So of course she's not going to say or do anything that could be interpreted as being approval of such acts...or such “lifestyles”.
37 posted on 06/03/2012 3:42:32 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If Mugabe Had A Son He'd Look Like Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some. How much longer will the LGBT community have to wait for royal recognition and acceptance?

When hell freezes over is open on my calendar. lol

38 posted on 06/03/2012 3:44:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Why would she give any more attention to the narcissism and nihilism of mentally ill people who claim a vile filthy immature act is “good”. Just mentioning that group is talking about a disgusting sexual act.

No group which is noted for foul sexual acts should be given the time of day—like since Christianity became the paradigm and homosexuality and pederasty and slavery were put in the closet.

Evil can NEVER be good, even if the majority say it is. That is what Moral Absolutes are all about. Abortion is evil also and majority vote should not be able to take away a person’s life-—it is evil (Hitlerian) whether the majority think so or not.

She remains a Classy Queen with Moral Absolutes. Good for her.


39 posted on 06/03/2012 3:45:22 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Queen Elizabeth is a good woman. I admire her very much.

(And Prince Phillip is a colorful old crackpot, like some of my great-uncles, if they were European royalty instead of Missouri farmers.)


40 posted on 06/03/2012 3:46:53 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Make sure you notice when I'm being subtly ironic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson