Skip to comments.Controversial Professorís Case before Colorado Supreme Court ( Ward Churchill )
Posted on 06/07/2012 8:15:11 AM PDT by george76
A University of Colorado professor fired following public outcry over an essay in which he compared some Sept. 11 victims to a Nazi is arguing his case before the Colorado Supreme Court.
The court will hear arguments Thursday afternoon regarding the 2007 termination of Ward Churchill.
(Excerpt) Read more at kktv.com ...
Fake, but inaccurate..........
The enemedia tries to frame his firing on Ward blaming the victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as little Eichmanns.
The enemedia ignores the real reasons for his firing :
Among other things, Churchill was found guilty of passing off others’ work as his own ( plagiarism ), but also of passing off his own work as others’.
This permits the author to create the false appearance that his claims are supported by other scholars when, in fact, he is the only source for such claims...
This communist nut-case belongs in a penitentiary.
Did he claim to have written “The Communist Manifesto”?
Ah,Churchill an Obamadork-level intellect who also managed to fool a politically correct college containing no discernable grownups at the wheel.
Churchill, Elizabeth Warren, and the Obama should start a “university” - for liberal arts only. They’ve got the mental firepower.
Will Elizabeth Warren file an amicus brief?
Cherokees need to stick together...
Maybe he will base this case on saying his life and credentials are fake, so what he wrote isn't really his, therefore he can't be fired for not really doing anything real.
Ward Churchill didn't get fired for what he said about 9-11. That is HIS spin. He got fired because he was found out doing “sock puppet” scholarship.
It seems that none of the “scholars” in his field (of identity politics and victimology 101) were impressed with his writings and they failed, year after year, to cite his “research” in their own ‘scholarly work’.
Well they keep track of such things - especially in fields where the “impact” of their work is not obvious because it is so useless and utterly inapplicable to anything OTHER THAN being cited by others in victimology / womyns studies or whatnot.
What is a fake Indian to do? Well invent a pseudonym and create a ‘scholarly work’ in the field citing lovingly and at length the brilliant work of Ward Churchill!
He should marry Princess Faux-cahontas Elizabeth Warren.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.