would Nancy have tried to abort Stephen Hawking?
So Hitler was just a poor, misunderstood, pro-science kinda guy.
Scratch a liberal......
However, it is pro G_d to let them be born.
Science is a neutral thing like fire or water. It can be put to evil or good uses. In this case the use being proposed is evil.
Ok one last post. Two days ago I took baby girl in for her 9 month appt (and argument about us not using vaccines with aborted human tissue) and there was this lively 16 month old running around. He was perfect. He had not a single defect. His parents told the waiting room that at 18 months pregnant they had been told to abort. Mom could not carry to term and baby had spina bifida. The blood tests said so. There you go.
Let’s see, Nancy. Homosexuality is genetic, isn’t it? That is one of your fundamental assumptions. So if we test and see that gene you’re OK with an abortion on that basis?
For that matter, race is genetic so that would be a good basis as well! Oh, wait, that’s already happening at Planned Parenthood, and with your blessing!
They just never change do they?
Just so there’s no confusion - is a “gay” gene considered a genetic defect?
Dr. Memgele’s illegitimate daughter???
I know a couple that aborted a baby that every test showed would lead a life with horrific disabilities. The mom was a devout Catholic. That was 15 years ago and she has never been the same. Limbs never tell that side.
Why is it that lock-step loony left wing moonbats ALWAYS try to justify their murderous nonsense with “science”?
Case in fact: Bloomers in NY wants to stop “obesity” by curbing how much soda you can drink at a sitting. His rational? Obesity costs the taxpayer money in shared medical costs, he says. Well, golly gee whop!
I.e. PUBLIC FREAKIN BURDEN!!
Well now, as a biker who fought the helmet fight, let me tell you, you want to talk PUBLIC FEAKN BURDEN? LET’S TALK EFFING AIDS!!
Aids is a FOR REAL public burden. Its costs to the health care system are WELL KNOWN, its root cause is completely understood; unhinged, irrational, senseless and selfish behavior.
Until the nannycrats force ALL HOMOS WHO ENGAGE IN THEIR DESTRUCTIVE LIFESTYLE TO WEAR THEIR EFFING HELMETS BEFORE THEY “DIVE IN”, don’t tell me how to effing live, how to ride a motorcycle without my “helmet”, what to drink, what not to drink, what to smoke etc. etc. etc.
These people are COWARDS OF THE WORST SORT. Go begger the queers for their lean on the “public burden”, after that, I might just listen to you.
/rant>
The very first beginning of The Holocaust was a National Socialist program called “The T4 Action”, and it was run by physicians who decided whether the individual’s life was “worth living”. If not, the crippled, mentally ill, “retarded”, and so forth were killed, at first by lethal injection or starvation but later in gas chambers disguised as showers. I’ll re-emphasize that the program was run by physicians as part of the National Socialist health care system. It “euthanized” over 100,000 humans before they started in on Jews and Poles.
The very first beneficiary of this “Biology in Life” effort was a young boy.
All quite scientific and rationalized.
We seem to be starting T4 even earlier, before the child is born. A related story is the one in which over 3800 genetic problems can be determined based on samples of the mother’s blood and father’s buccal DNA sample.
Sorry all.
Yes, it was a science rant, just a little misplaced.
Using “science” to justify the killing of an unborn child is just as stupid as Bloombutts war on soda.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
You mean like being the wrong race or the wrong gender?
I found it- the name of the very first victim of the T4 Euthanasia Action, the first victim of the Holocaust, five month old Gerhard Kretschmar.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/euthanasia_program/Telegraph121000.html
This is just wrong.
I know of two instances in my own circle of friends in which their inutero babies were diagnosed with deformaties due to sonograms.. Both mothers refused to abort.
In one case, the baby was determined to have no arms. Surprise, not only did he have arms, he has a baseball scholarship to a very good college.
In the other, the mother was assured the baby would be born dead. Surprise, he is a 6 foot 6 inch tall pediatric nurse today.
Go figure how reliable these tests are. And..in any case, it’s your kid, no matter what.
We might want to consult God on this.
Years ago, I had a then-girlfriend who saw Dr. Snyderman regularly as her regular physician. Even back then, the doctor had made very clear her pro-abortion views.
Unfortunately, shortly after that, Dr. Snyderman started her gig as a medical correspondent on a TV station in the San Francisco Bay Area and eventually went national.
If a “gay gene” is ever discovered will it be ok to abort pre-gay babies if you don’t want a gay kid?