Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AFL-CIO Pulling Funds From Obama Campaign
U.S. News & World Report ^ | Wednesday, June 13, 2012 | Elizabeth Flock

Posted on 06/13/2012 10:35:25 AM PDT by kristinn

The AFL-CIO has told Washington Whispers it will redeploy funds away from political candidates smack dab in the middle of election season, the latest sign that the largest federation of unions in the country could be becoming increasingly disillusioned with President Obama.

The federation says the shift has been in the works for months, and had nothing to do with the president's failure to show in Wisconsin last week, where labor unions led a failed recall election of Governor Scott Walker.

"We wanted to start investing our funds in our own infrastructure and advocacy," AFL-CIO spokesman Josh Goldstein told Whispers. "There will be less contributions to candidates," including President Obama.

While there were "a lot of different opinions" about whether Obama should have gone to Wisconsin, according to Goldstein, "this is not a slight at the president."

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; aflcio; democrats; elections; nobama2012; obama; trumka
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: kidd

I have the same feeling. This thing is collapsing on Obama. He is all but unelectable at this point in November, and it is looking like he could pull the entire party down with him.

I am wondering now if Hillary enters is she would have a chance, or whether it just might be done to help salvage seats in the Senate and House.


21 posted on 06/13/2012 10:59:14 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The private sector unions see the writing on the wall...

Their fight is at the state level keeping right to work legislation from becoming reality...in many states

They are smart enough to know the Fed cannot help them so giving Obama money is pretty much throwing it away...


22 posted on 06/13/2012 10:59:41 AM PDT by Popman (When you elect a clown: expect a circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freestate316; All
Wow! I think that it has a lot to do with the losing recall effort in Wisconsin, as well as polls showing an across the board erosion in Obama’s support, even among black voters. This makes me wonder if union leaders are working on the inside, using their economic and manpower leverage to bring about a major shift in Democratic support to Hillary, either as a replacement for Biden, or even the top of the ticket.

I remain skeptical, I can't see them pulling a Lautenberg at this point, it is a logistic nightmare and IMHO they loose the American of African Decent vote forever if they do.

They have screwed the pooch with running this horse and they are gonna have to suck it up until November. Besides IMHO he won't leave the whole Malignant Narcissism thing ya know...

23 posted on 06/13/2012 10:59:44 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

I’m wondering if this was a chesspiece type move to get funds available to support/persuade hillary to run.


24 posted on 06/13/2012 11:00:54 AM PDT by MCOAvalanche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I suggest Republicans start looking into union pension funds & if necessary initiate legislation to make sure they are fully funded before unions can spend dues money on ‘outside activities’. That would slow some of these guys down.


25 posted on 06/13/2012 11:01:20 AM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
That is really leave a very nasty mark! :-D

26 posted on 06/13/2012 11:01:25 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
The private sector unions see the writing on the wall... Their fight is at the state level keeping right to work legislation from becoming reality...in many states They are smart enough to know the Fed cannot help them so giving Obama money is pretty much throwing it away...

Have you heard of Terry Bowman? I have had the privilige to meet and discuss ideas with him on a few occasions...

http://www.unionconservatives.com/

27 posted on 06/13/2012 11:02:17 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Lookimgt forward to watching what Ed “Union Mobster Mouthpiece” has to saay about this.... >B-^)`


28 posted on 06/13/2012 11:09:29 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

True, but this is a seismic shift in the campaign landscape. The likelihood of Obama not being the candidate is miniscule, but Biden adds nothing, is universally acknowledged as a doofus, and could be easily replaced with someone who has broad appeal with white working class union people. I’m not sure that is even a remote possibility of Biden actually being replaced either, but I’m sure there are whispers of the sort. Just pray that Obama’s slide continues, and the next 21 weeks should be very interesting!


29 posted on 06/13/2012 11:11:11 AM PDT by Freestate316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Let's see:

The war on coal has hurt the UMW.

While the GM bailout seemed like a sweetheart deal for the unions, their likely greatest area of manufacturing growth is.....China.

The Keystone pipeline jobs would have included jobs which organized labor could have had...

Unions have been losing popularity and jobs, (in tough times there is no shortage of non-union applicants who are ready, able, and willing to work) and even the management has got to see that if there is no rank and file to pay dues, sooner or later they won't have enough cash flow to 'operate'.

Wisconsin is just the beginning of the end for people working in the Public Sector using our money to lobby for more of our money.

30 posted on 06/13/2012 11:17:22 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Pssst-it’s only a threat. After all these years of funding the dems, the unions are not about to tell their members to support conservatives. Then again, maybe the union bosses are ready to cut their losses, take whatever money remains, and RUN.


31 posted on 06/13/2012 11:25:46 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
This is good news and sends the message that the AFL-CIO, a mainstay of Democrat party candidates and coffers, is pulling back. The reasons are obvious. From the AFL-CIO point of view, Obama has miserably failed the unions - Wisconsin was simply the tipping point - and the claims that doing this "has been in the works for months" and "this isn't a slight to the president" ring very hollow, especially to the narcissist Obama. His response, if any, should be interesting.
32 posted on 06/13/2012 11:37:55 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Unions are in their final death-battle. They are gonna tug at Obama’s shorthairs until he implements Card Check by executive order. That’s the only thing that will reverse their long decline, enforced membership.


33 posted on 06/13/2012 11:46:48 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
...they loose the American of African Decent vote forever if they do.(sic)

Really, the 'Black Vote' is highly overrated. Their entire population is only about 14% of the populace, and that's counting babies, older children and the aged and infirm. Of that group, how many actually show up at the polls on election day? They may be concentrated in urban areas, but as for the rest of the country, they are relatively diluted to the point of being just another vote in a sea of electorate. That's one reason the Democrat Party had really ignored them for decades, politically, because targeting funds to a small group of people that will essentially be in your back pocket is not efficient use of funds. ....

34 posted on 06/13/2012 11:46:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Hillary would be the better president between the two, just saying.


35 posted on 06/13/2012 11:49:32 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freestate316

The Clinton’s know Obama will lose and lose big this year. Hill is not going to put her political future at risk for a losing ticket.

After Obama loses and the tsunami sweeps away numerous other dems they Clinton’s will come back to rescue ‘their’ party. The dems will have to suffer (from the Clinton POV) for picking the narcissist over Hill in 2008.


36 posted on 06/13/2012 12:11:16 PM PDT by Leto (Damn shame Sarah didn't run the Presidency was there for the taking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kidd
"Now I’m getting concerned that Obama is doing SO bad that the DEMs will try to make Hillary Clinton the candidate."

You can count on that but it won't work. When it comes to this the press will have written him off and will describe it as a desperate move.

37 posted on 06/13/2012 12:14:00 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Isn't the Democrat primary over?

How would Hillary even get on the ballot in many states?

38 posted on 06/13/2012 12:15:02 PM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Leto

Possibly, but don’t you think that Hillary is nearing her expiration date? In 2016 she’ll be pushing 70.


39 posted on 06/13/2012 12:24:38 PM PDT by Freestate316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

:) :) :) !!!!!!


40 posted on 06/13/2012 12:32:08 PM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson