Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge strikes down part of Chicago's gun law
chicagotribune.com ^ | 6/19/12 | Liam Ford

Posted on 06/19/2012 1:40:22 PM PDT by ColdOne

A federal judge has thrown out part of Chicago's gun law, ruling that a section banning permits for people convicted of unlawful use of a weapon is vague and unconstitutional

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; chicago; doom; unconstitutional

1 posted on 06/19/2012 1:40:26 PM PDT by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Worth reading the entire Tribune article.


2 posted on 06/19/2012 1:49:57 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Nice to see a win for liberty.


3 posted on 06/19/2012 1:51:50 PM PDT by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Who needs a permit in the peaceful Utopia of Chicago anyway?


4 posted on 06/19/2012 1:52:12 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Couldn’t happen to a nicer tyranny. The Feds don’t edit down this overly wide dragnet — they just chuck it all out. Back to the drawing board Rahm-rod!


5 posted on 06/19/2012 2:21:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Sometimes, the federal court system is the only protection we citizens have against government tyranny. Three cheers for a functioning, independent judiciary.


6 posted on 06/19/2012 2:38:11 PM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“There is something incongruent about a nonviolent person, who is not a felon but who is convicted of a misdemeanor offense of simple possession of a firearm, being forever barred from exercising his constitutional right to defend himself in his own home in Chicago against felons or violent criminals,” Der-Yeghiayan said.

“The same constitution that protects people’s right to bear arms prohibits this type of indiscriminate and arbitrary governmental regulation,” he continued. “It is the opinion of this court that any attempt to dilute or restrict a core constitutional right with justifications that do not have a basis in history and tradition is inherently suspect.”


This ruling could really set the stage against state-level ‘assault weapons’ bans in the several states which have them, particularly for those who’ve been prosecuted and/or convicted under those laws.


7 posted on 06/19/2012 5:00:02 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson