Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Amnesty and Affirmative Action
American Thinker ^ | June 22, 2012 | Jason Kissner

Posted on 06/22/2012 3:49:47 PM PDT by neverdem

Many readers are by now well aware of Mr. Obama's decision to confer what amounts to amnesty upon a certain class of illegal immigrants.

According to Mr. Obama, Congress didn't act (apparently settled immigration law doesn't constitute action), so Mr. Obama decided to unilaterally create what amounts to legislation that never passed (the DREAM act.) What an affirmative actor!

The constitutional infirmities of this decision are pronounced and involve the functional equivalent of the repeal of statutory schemes by the executive (for good summaries, click here and here).

President Mr. Obama's justification for his unconstitutional policy edict presents conservatives with an opportunity to begin unwinding a grotesque policy that has, for many decades, been enormously...

--snip--

What we are talking about with regard to Mr. Obama's immigration edict is a malignant constitutional violation the main justification of which should -- given the pernicious and self-serving hypocrisy displayed in regard to matters touching on race -- infuriate any defender of individual liberty.

The national "discourse" on race is utterly dominated as to time, place, and subject matter by people who control the executive branch, a big chunk of the MSM, and much else besides. Such people have the nerve to shrilly denounce as racists millions of Americans who dare to ask a question or two of a tyrant, who have capitulated to culturally decadent affirmative programs that by design discriminate on the basis of race, and who now demand nothing more -- and nothing less -- than equal protection of the law.

It is time to ask: how much racism really remains in our society when these things are true, and from where does the racism that really remains very frequently emanate?

Mr. Obama's unconstitutional decision of June 15 kicked millions of Americans in the teeth in more ways than one.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; amnesty; obama

1 posted on 06/22/2012 3:49:57 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Based on the cowardice of the Repubs in the House & Senate, I’m surprised Obama hasn’t declared himself POTUS for life.


2 posted on 06/22/2012 3:54:22 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Based on the cowardice of the Repubs in the House & Senate, I’m surprised Obama hasn’t declared himself POTUS for life.
...........................................................
Wait: His term isn’t over yet.

If he does will Republicans object?

Doubtful.


3 posted on 06/22/2012 3:57:30 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Doubtful is right. Maybe if Obama murdered a widow on TV, maybe Boehner would.......nah, he wouldn’t....


4 posted on 06/22/2012 4:00:16 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Marxists give each other the best advantages in career opportunities. They take care of each other at our expense while we play fair.


5 posted on 06/22/2012 4:05:38 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Mr. Obama's unconstitutional decision ...

Maybe it is just a personal thing with me but...all these pundits and commentators talking about something that is "unconstitutional" leaves me cold. Nothing is unconstitutional until ruled so by SCOTUS! Do the opponents have the gonads to challenge this in court to get it ruled unconstitutional - NO!

6 posted on 06/22/2012 4:05:46 PM PDT by TexasRedeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye

” Do the opponents have the gonads to challenge this in court to get it ruled unconstitutional - NO! “

Correct.


7 posted on 06/22/2012 4:26:36 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye; stephenjohnbanker
Do the opponents have the gonads to challenge this in court to get it ruled unconstitutional - NO!

Not so. McCain Fiengold got defanged , but it took two different cases and many years. You need the right case, and SCOTUS has to agree to accept it. Why waste all that time and energy when the general election can reverse it.

8 posted on 06/22/2012 7:50:21 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson