Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EDT,WABC AM, June 25, 2012
The EIB Network ^ | June 25, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/25/2012 8:33:59 AM PDT by Biggirl

Call The Rush Limbaugh Show program line between 12 Noon and 3PM Eastern Time at: 1-800-282-2882

E-mail Rush: ElRushbo@eibnet.com

Fax Rush at: 212-445-3963

Write a letter to Rush and mail it to:

The Rush Limbaugh Show

1270 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

Join This Ping List Now! Click Here To Join this Ping List!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: conservatism; rushlimbaugh; rushlive; scotusarizona; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Rush Limbaugh
Holy Crap have you read the Scalia dissent? He goes directly after 0bama!

The President said at a news conference that the new program is "the right thingto do" in light of Congress's failure to pass the Administration's proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.

The Court opinion's looming specter of inutterable horror--"[i]f §3 of the Arizona statute were valid, every State could give itself independent authority to prosecute federal registration violations," seems to me not so horrible and even less looming. But there has come to pass, and is with us today, the specter that Arizona and the States that support it predicted: A Federal Government that does not want to enforce the immigration lawsas written, and leaves the States' borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude. So the issue is a stark one. Are the sovereign States at themercy of the Federal Executive's refusal to enforce the Nation's immigration laws?

21 posted on 06/25/2012 10:10:59 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Yikes!

Re: Rubio. He jumped the shark yesterday on Meet The Greggy not supporting the Arizona immigration law.


22 posted on 06/25/2012 10:15:13 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

SB1070 got it right on the head soup to nuts....


23 posted on 06/25/2012 10:16:01 AM PDT by advertising guy (the White House hasn't had this much leakin since Billy Carter watered the Rose Garden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

Doesn’t Feceral law trump State law?


24 posted on 06/25/2012 10:40:16 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

no.”feceral law” says when ya gotta go,ya gotta go


25 posted on 06/25/2012 10:42:54 AM PDT by advertising guy (the White House hasn't had this much leakin since Billy Carter watered the Rose Garden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Why is this guy calling in a show to tell us he is frustrated with this ruling jeopardizing his job??


26 posted on 06/25/2012 10:44:34 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

He’s a Border Patrol Agent.


27 posted on 06/25/2012 10:45:49 AM PDT by angcat (GO YANKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy
no.”feceral law” says when ya gotta go,ya gotta go

You said the same thing I did. Feceral law RULES over state law.

28 posted on 06/25/2012 10:47:11 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Rush gave away another Apple laptop. It’s hilarious when he does it. The caller was a Border Agent and he was refusing to take it, but sanity prevailed


29 posted on 06/25/2012 10:47:53 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angcat

I realize that. I would assume all BPAgents would be frrustrated...it’s a given. That’s why I’m confused why this guy would risk a 25 yr career just expressing what all the agents would express.


30 posted on 06/25/2012 10:48:50 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
He got a computer out of it. lol
31 posted on 06/25/2012 10:55:20 AM PDT by angcat (GO YANKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: angcat

..and I guess signed by Rushbo. Totally worth it then...lol


32 posted on 06/25/2012 11:29:16 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks; advertising guy; All
Scalia's Full Bench Statement--- Well worth the read

Arizona v. United States--- Scalia's Dissenting Bench Statement

Also, comments from live ScotusBlog:

Justice Scalia would uphold the Arizona statute in toto.

Justice Scalia began his dissent by saying that he would uphold all parts of the Arizona law.

Justice Scalia is not only dissenting from the bench, but he has produced a written copy of the bench statement for the press. It is 7 pages long.

http://scotusblog.wpengine.com/

33 posted on 06/25/2012 11:49:31 AM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

And he read it sitting on the bench which is unusual.

Usually the Supremes write their opinion and let everyone read it for themselves.


34 posted on 06/25/2012 12:09:03 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Obama has already ordered the Feds to refuse the calls on cases from Arizona.


35 posted on 06/25/2012 12:30:00 PM PDT by Ingtar ("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
And he read it sitting on the bench which is unusual.

Yup. Scalia feels strongly about this!!! Some saying he read an angry statement, but is it a criticism from the Dums or an objective observation? Don't know.

I knew of his statement from the live ScotusBlog and that Scalia was making a copy available to the press.

What took so long for a link? It's still hard to find.

It sent a tingle up my leg when I read it. :-)

BTW: In the full court opinion, Thomas also wrote a dissenting opinion. I haven't read it yet.:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-182b5e1.pdf

36 posted on 06/25/2012 12:36:30 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

bttt


37 posted on 06/25/2012 9:02:15 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ("There is no limit to the depravity of the liberal mind" ~ Rush Limbaugh 5/23/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson