Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maybe Roberts Got it Right After All
Self | June 28, 2012 | Alberta's Child

Posted on 06/28/2012 6:54:37 PM PDT by Alberta's Child

Upon further review and discussion here, I've concluded that the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in the ObamaCare case was exactly what this country needed. He effectively took the heap of crap that had been dumped in the halls of the U.S. Supreme Court and tossed it right back out where it belongs: in the homes and businesses of every U.S. citizen who has allowed this bunch of fools in Washington to govern us this way.

Think of it, folks ... Any obligation of the U.S. Supreme Court to deal with this idiocy went out the window the moment that dingbat Nancy Pelosi stood up on television and said: "We have to pass the bill to see what's in it."

If I were a Supreme Court justice, I wouldn't spend 30 seconds of my life reading a single legal brief in a case involving a Federal statute that was passed even though the Speaker of the House of Representatives didn't even read the damn thing before voting on it.

On top of all that, just consider this: There were 28 states that filed legal challenges to ObamaCare, either individually or jointly. How can 28 states file legal challenges to a Federal law that was passed in the U.S. Senate by a 60-39 margin? If I'm sitting on the Supreme Court and the Attorney General of, say, Pennsylvania (which is one of these 28 states) comes in for oral arguments in the case, my first and only "question" would be: "If you have such a problem with this Federal statute, why don't you take it up with Bob Casey, Arlen Specter and those nine House members in your state who passed the damn thing ... along with the idiots in your state who cast their electoral votes for that jug-eared Kenyan nitwit in 2008?"


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; johnroberts; obamacare; vanity; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last
To: netmilsmom
No one forced Roberts to stay on the SCOTUS. If he felt threatened he could have retired any time.

Instead he chose to stay & move the entire nation a great leap closer to slavery.

41 posted on 06/28/2012 7:14:50 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I agree with you. No way in heck anyone can afford this. We will all owe the IRS. It’s not a sustainable law. It will collapse all on its own.


42 posted on 06/28/2012 7:15:29 PM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: verga

And which imbecile would that be? Roberts is not an elected official. How is the US deserving of such a moron?

I only can vote for two senate seats and one house seat. I have no power to vote for more. The reason the court exists is to protect us from the vagaries of government gone wild.


43 posted on 06/28/2012 7:15:36 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Sorry. You should be a lot more concerned than you seem to be.

The judicial precedent cannot be undone. It is now accepted law in the US--that Congress can financially punish anyone for any reason, including especially the coercion of specific individual private citizens' behaviors.

That's not republican government. That's totalitarianism. And a Harvard indoctrinated asshole has done it to you whether you realize it or not

44 posted on 06/28/2012 7:15:36 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Can't disagree with you ... People get, and deserve, what they vote for.

It's Tea Party Time, and I'm hoping this is a winning issue in our coming elections.

45 posted on 06/28/2012 7:16:12 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Roberts tossed bad law back at the people responsible for it.

He could have accomplished the same thing by killing ObamaCare today. Simply saying, "I don't care what the Solicitor General argues. The law was not passed as a tax. If Congress wants to, they can pass it as a tax and it will stand. But for now, it's dead."

46 posted on 06/28/2012 7:16:26 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I’m with you skeeter! There’s nothing constitutional about this law and nothing good about it.


47 posted on 06/28/2012 7:17:59 PM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You are dreaming. This thing will bankrupt the country before collapsing. Do you not see the take over of this country by a far left communist party??? Can you NOT see that???


48 posted on 06/28/2012 7:18:12 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I think he might very well have lit a fuse that will end up destroying it.


49 posted on 06/28/2012 7:18:46 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

If you think Roberts got it right then you need to read the constitution. Unfortunatly, (or not) the Court has the obligation to interpret the words. We got an asshole for a chief justice. He’s .... oh well...
You’re going to need to paint your house green or pay the tax.
Or buy hurricane tax in Montana or flood insurance in Vermont.\


50 posted on 06/28/2012 7:18:54 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: formosa

I agree that Roberts was dead wrong, formosa. Whether he’s a flaming liberal, plain stupid, or someone got to him.....I don’t know. But you are right, he cannot be trusted.


51 posted on 06/28/2012 7:19:06 PM PDT by Girlene (Chief AHat Roberts - should resign in disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

nice white flag you fool!

incredible...simply incredible.

You have to be an establishment lover...

Roberts just proved he is a progressive along with Bush and the rest over the other aholes we have been saddled with in the GOP.

Roberts subverted Judge Carter in an eligibility case, he went against Arizona and now this...really you think in any way shape or form that there is anything “right” about this decision?

Did you read the dissent? They were so obviously clear and all Roberts did was give us the Rodney King BS PC answer!


52 posted on 06/28/2012 7:19:57 PM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Please go to Mark Levin's site and download his show from today. Mark is a Constitutional scholar. After listening to his show you will clearly see that this was a extremely destructive ruling.

Mark said absolutely nothing good will come from this ruling. It is horrible, horrible for Liberty.

No amount of rationalizing will remove the fact that this ruling greatly increases the power of the sadistic bureaucracies that will grow to implement this and other monstrosities.

53 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:22 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I bet they take the money first, then you have to send in proof on insurance to get a refund.


54 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:22 PM PDT by razorback-bert (I'm in shape. Round is a shape isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: verga
I keep thinking it took Carter to Get us Reagan, But to paraphrase another Senator: Mitt Romney is no Reagan.

Obama is no Carter. Carter was a better man. Mitt Romney is so much better than Obama, as much as Reagan was better than Carter.

55 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:22 PM PDT by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Basically, IMHO, he tossed it back to the Congress. Congress can't start negotiations for a tax unless, and untill, it comes from the House. That didn't happen in this case/law! It started in the Senate! Also, any revenues/taxes (That's what Robert's called the individual mandate (plucked from where, I don't know)) or appropriations have to have a 2/3's majority in BOTH houses, which Obamacare doesn't or hasn't met!

Send it back for another vote, now that it's a tax on the middle class and the poorest among us, and see if it passes!

56 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:32 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Everyone should keep in mind that this was only one case involving ObamaCare -- and this case was brought by plaintiffs from multiple states to decide on the constitutionality of the overall law.

There is likely to be a mass of further challenges as additional provisions of ObamaCare are implemented in the future. These challenges can't be brought today because nobody has the legal standing to challenge them until they are implemented.

My prediction is that the Federal government is going to spend billions of health care dollars fighting legal battles with each and every ObamaCare measure that is implemented over time. And the constitutionality of ObamaCare will be fought on all of those additional grounds, too.

57 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:50 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Halls

Yep

Country is broke

No way is there $$$$ for this garbage

Hell we will be lucky if were are eating comes 2014


58 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:50 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Popman
The thing was constitutional or it wasn’t It’s as simple as that

Bump. All the rest is wishful thinking and mental masturbation. He could'a done the right thing and he failed. End of story.

59 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

“I wonder if his epilepsy medication had anything to do with his “decision”.”

I don’t think it was the meds. I think the veiled threats from Obama and the NY Times simply got to the man, and he folded. You don’t want to be in a foxhole with John Roberts. He is more concerned with protecting the image of the Court as seen through the eyes of the leftist elites, rather than carrying out his oath of office. In the end I think we should redouble our efforts — the biggest challenge will be not allowing this setback to deter us. We need 51 votes, not 60. So this is doable (assuming Romney wins).


60 posted on 06/28/2012 7:21:06 PM PDT by crusader71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson