Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum: Romneycare 'hasn't worked in Mass'- 'voting for Romney over Obama a clear choice for me'
Ny Daily News ^ | June 29, 2012 | Kristen A. Lee /

Posted on 06/30/2012 2:43:06 PM PDT by Innovative

Santorum, however, noted that Romney has vowed to repeal Obama's health care law.

He said voting for Romney over Obama is a "clear choice for me."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1morelastchance; agitatorsforobams; backstabberromney; elections; iwontvoteforromney; loserromney; mitt4romney; obama; obamacare; proobamaspammers; rinoromney; romney; romney4nytimes; romneycare; romneycare4all; romneycare4u; romneydeathpanels; romneytherino; santorum; verminromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201 next last
To: BlackElk

(say ... is “awoken” a word? I’m too lazy to look it up!) {^)


101 posted on 07/03/2012 8:20:28 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Every single word of your post applies to the consequences of a Romney landslide, except for the hysterical mantra an Obama second term ... will result in the total destruction of the US and our freedoms. That is pure mass hysteria and cowardice.

Consequences are the ONLY thing that matter.

And if Romney wins in a landslide and proceeds to steamroll his agenda of subjecting our national sovereignty in energy and food production to the global warming agenda, of forcing the accomodation of open homosexuals in everything from the military to schools to Boy Scout troops, to pushing RomneyCare V 2.1, to appointing activist judges that make Roberts look harmless, all the while telling conservatives to sit down and be quiet like good little children, you ABOers who voted for Romney against your better judgment and contributed to seeing him elected on a "popular mandate" landslide, would be in anquish at how true that statement is.

We all know where the road with good intentions lead.

Heed your own words, FRiend. And while you're at it, heed as well that we all know where panic and hysteria lead: to DUMB CHOICES regretted later.

ABO is based 100% on fear. It is a BAD STRATEGY.

102 posted on 07/03/2012 8:31:41 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Posting self portraits now? Certainly your tagline is a form of one.


103 posted on 07/03/2012 8:33:21 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JLLH

More hysteria and fear.


104 posted on 07/03/2012 8:34:50 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: balls
Obama sympathizers Diogenisis and Cripplecreek ...

... are among at least 169 FReepers including the owner and founder of this website, who understand that Romney is a bridge too far and that voting for him is as destructive and counter-productive -- in short, as nuts -- as voting for Obama.

Who knew that Jim Robinson and I are "Obama sympathizers"!

When it comes to standing and fighting for conservatism, your screen name is a one-word oxymoron.

105 posted on 07/03/2012 8:45:09 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JLLH
Isn't it interesting that telling the truth of what you believe will happen if barry gets four more years is dismissed as ‘more fear mongering’, by those who are working hard to get folks to vote third party ‘to teach the GOPe a lesson’? And if that dismissive insult doesn't work, you will next be informed how your voting for Romney is a violation of God's righteousness, a slap in the face of Christ, or some other carefully worded insult. It smacks of axelrodesque strategery, which even if not from axelgreasy's talking points is a creepy convergence.
106 posted on 07/03/2012 8:48:37 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

BTTT!


107 posted on 07/03/2012 8:51:17 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Wow! Even for a guy who is voting for Romney and urging others to join him, I must say your intellectual arguments here are very compelling! *snort*


108 posted on 07/03/2012 8:52:59 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark; cripplecreek; Diogenesis
And hey, why aren't I on that list too?

Well, you're on my list that I've been compiling for a couple weeks now of folks like you, me, cripplecreek, Dio-g, and Jim Robinson, who understand how dangerous Romney is and how exaggerated the claims of Obama's threat. I started it just to confirm how many of us few-and-far-betweeners were here, expecting to find about 60 FReepers who've delcared their refusal to support Romney. The list is now at 170, exceeding my expectations nearly threefold. :^)

Welcome aboard. Let's pray that the list gets longer as November nears.

109 posted on 07/03/2012 9:03:23 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
those who are working hard to get folks to vote third party ‘to teach the GOPe a lesson’...

You still aren't actually reading and comprehending posts -- unless you think that turning the wheel on a car to get it to turn right is the same as "teaching it a lesson."

You never fail to disappoint.

110 posted on 07/03/2012 9:14:00 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Oh I get your ‘strategery’, I just believe you are trying to make it possible for the democrats to cheat and win the election, because only when it is close can the few million fabricated votes throw the election. You either don’t believe that or don’t want that pointed out because it exposes the flaw in your ‘grand design for plurality’. Try a different insult, your alinskyesque smarm is not working.


111 posted on 07/03/2012 9:21:18 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark; cripplecreek; Diogenesis

Scratch that 170 — miscounted; it’s actually 172. :^) We are in excellent company.


112 posted on 07/03/2012 9:26:55 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Man, you crack me up. Talk aboy "alinskyesque smarm"!

LOLOL!!!

You have water for guts.

113 posted on 07/03/2012 9:29:24 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Good post #68 - minus the “fault” part. I don’t think Conservatives are to blame for having a wealth of candidates to muddy the waters (some more conservative than others and none necessarily compelling on all counts). The game was rigged from the start. My state went for Santorum.

Now Palin (whom I do respect a great deal) is saying exactly what will happen should the Zero get in for another 4 and it’s called “fear mongering”. Denial is not just a ....well, you know the rest.


114 posted on 07/03/2012 10:11:44 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN

Great post #85. i agree completely. I’ll vote ANY one who can win versus O come November. I may have to take a shower afterwards, but I’ll do what I have to do to help save this country from another 4 years of the Thug in Residence. I couldn’t live with my conscience afterwards if Zero got in for another 4 years and I had treated this like just another election (it isn’t and those conservatives who haven’t figured that out yet need to do so quickly.)

No one on our side can afford to vote third party or sit home. No one. I get that this is distasteful to many but the old “I”ll NEVER vote for a RINO” mantra has to sit out on this one. There’s just too much on the line. And if that strikes some as “fear mongering” they really need to take an honest look around at what has happened since this cretin was elected. Did anyone REALLY believe 4 years would make such a horrible difference and we would have a lawless agitator in the White House?? Does any thinking person really maintain we can have another 4 years of this and recognize the nation when we’re done? I have principles too and any other election I wouldn’t vote RINO if given a choice, but there may not BE any other choice to slow this train down — and if we ever hope to have another decent President in the White House and live to fight another day we’d better realize we have to do what we must THIS time. There likely won’t be another chance to fix it.


115 posted on 07/03/2012 10:23:28 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I agree with you. There may be some here who genuinely like Romney, but I’m not one of them. Nevertheless I’ll vote Mickey Mouse if he has an “R” after his name this November — anyone who can win against the Zero (and whether we like it or not there is no viable third party option who can win this thing this time so it’s one of two choices).


116 posted on 07/03/2012 10:27:54 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Finny

There’s a huge difference between implementing something at the state level and incorporating a huge “one size fits all” system at the national. States can repeal what they do not like at that level. Witness the intrusion at the Fed. level.

He’s said he’ll work to institute free market options. Obama has said — ......


117 posted on 07/03/2012 10:31:31 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Fear, you bet. Only a fool wouldn’t be at this point — or someone with their head stuck so far in the sand they can’t see reality staring them in the face. Hysteria? Hardly. Reality? Absolutely.


118 posted on 07/03/2012 10:34:32 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

It’s beyond interesting. It’s ridiculous. This is not the time to try to “teach the GOP a lesson” because it will backfire horribly. There’s not enough name recognition for a national election Tea Party candidate to win. IF we get the Zero out, that’s what we can all work on. But we have to have a country left in order to do so. I’ll vote for the guy who promises to undo the Zero’s madness, then I’ll hold his feet to the fire. There is far more hope in making sure Tea Party candidates win against RINO candidates in Senatorial and Congressional elections. Work on that and it will help tremendously. But not the office of the Pres. Not this time.


119 posted on 07/03/2012 10:38:44 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; EternalVigilance; RitaOK; svcw; Tennessee Nana; Mountain Mary; GailA; Windflier; ...
Innovative:

The "consequences" of actually electing your leftist POS posing as a "Republican" will be precisely the same tragic policies since Myth has NO CORE PRINCIPLES and wants only to be accepted by upper income snobbocrat leftist fashionables and LSM uberleftists. The only difference with Myth will be his compulsive protection of Muffy's trust funds, kissing the asses of the brainless Junior Leaguers and polo players, and of the increased profits of HIS corrupt Wall Street cronies (as opposed to Obozo's corrupt Wall Street cronies).

The mere nomination of your leftist POS Romney GUARANTEES the destruction of the USA and our freedoms since there will be NO MEANINGFUL MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATE TO VOTE FOR. And, if your leftist sniveling POS Myth Romney is elected, that will be the end of the GOP as an effective opposition party. Read today's National Journal article on Real Clear Politics by Kraushear in which he quite credibly explains that your leftist POS Romney has already run up the white flag of surrender on Obozocare because he was its REAL father and like most leftist POS "GOP" candidates, his major fear in life is being criticized by the LSM. He better get used to the fact that he is no more capable of avoiding that criticism than was the last leftist POS McClain.

I am optimistic enough to firmly believe that no Romney love slave could possibly believe that he is any more worthy of election than is Obozo. So what is your real agenda since the stated one does not pass the smell test? Is it that, unless Myth is inaugurated, you lose that Myth for POTUS staff job and its attendant income and perks? That you are going to marry Muffy and want her trust fund to be bulletproof? That you ARE Muffy, etc. That you are a leftist posing as a "Republican" yourself and yearn for both parties to be xerox copies of one another in supporting social issue revolution, persecution of conservative churches, a policy of grabbing our national ankles for faggot everything, a mealy mouthed and spineless foreign policy, $$$ obsessiveness as to your $$$ and to hell with the American public, gun grabbing to disarm the peasants, continuation of ridiculous energy prices to farm the peasants for the mutual benefit of gummint and the corrupt Wall Street plutocracy, a desperate need to abandon any and all actually conservative principles as politically inconvenient???? Name your three favorite excuses from that list.

120 posted on 07/03/2012 11:15:33 AM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson