Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

20 Republicans set to Uphold Controversial UN treaty. (L.O.S.T. Treaty that is)
Moonbattery.com ^ | 12 July 2012 | Dave Blount

Posted on 07/12/2012 8:15:31 AM PDT by CharlesMartelsGhost

A major aspect of the liberal agenda is to use international treaties to undermine American sovereignty and liberty, as well as to loot Americans on behalf of global socialism. Among the most outrageous of these is the Law of the Sea Treaty, which calls for potentially $trillions of dollars of American wealth to be redistributed to other countries. Another is a small arms treaty that would infringe on the Second Amendment.

The internationalist (i.e., anti-American) Obama Regime requires help from the Senate to impose these treasonous treaties. Don’t think they won’t get it — even from Republicans. Appallingly, 18 Republican Senators are reportedly at least considering signing off on LOST: Mike Enzi (WY), Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX), Mike Johanns (NE), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Lindsey Graham (SC), John McCain (AZ), Dick Lugar (IN), Mark Kirk (IL), Olympia Snowe (ME), Susan Collins (ME), Lisa Murkowski (AK), Johnny Isakson (GA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Rob Portman (OH), Bob Corker (TN), Thad Cochran (MS), Scott Brown (MA), and Lamar Alexander (TN).

LOST represents not only a massive looting spree at American expense, but a severe encroachment on our national sovereignty. All Democrat Senators are expected to back it, confirming that their party is not just misguided but aggressively hostile to the USA, which it is in the process of destroying from within in the name of a oligarchical collectivist ideology absolutely opposed to our country’s founding principles.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: jessduntno
The decorated veteran, honorably discharged after a tour of duty in the Mekong Delta

tour of duty?....I spent more time in the sh**house than the 47 days this actor spent in country...16 days to process in..(31)...at least 7 days recoup after wounds.(24).......(one that included band aid removal....and at least 3 to process out.....21 days..TOUR MY ASS!

21 posted on 07/12/2012 8:46:04 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Oh man.. almost everyone of those Senators listed has been or is currently a member of the Republican Main Street Partnership. The GoP has a cancer and it is the moderates, the lukewarms, the GATT-a-longers ..

http://www.republicanmainstreet.org/about-us/

About
Mission

The Republican Main Street Partnership was founded in 1998 to promote thoughtful leadership in the Republican Party and to develop and advocate for pragmatic common sense solutions to the challenges our country faces.

Main Street is the governing wing of the Republican Party. Main Street’s membership is comprised of main stream fiscally conservative elected officials along with individuals and entities that support our mission. Main Street works with our elected officials, members, supporters and allies to develop and promote policy for implementation at appropriate levels of government.

MItt used to have his name listed alongside aRnie.

They say you can tell a lot about a person by who they hang with.


22 posted on 07/12/2012 8:46:33 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

It’s why I stopped supporting the R party long ago.

Those who continue to do so, clearly have political battered wives syndrome, as they drag their abused, broken beat up bodies back through the door, for another round of beat down.


23 posted on 07/12/2012 8:46:44 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I did the same. Unfortunately, I do not have great hopes that either of these RINOs will defend our Constitution.


24 posted on 07/12/2012 8:54:37 AM PDT by PCRit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Old news at best. 31 Republican Senators have announced opposition to LOST. 16 in favor or undecided.

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-administration-faces-increasing-ire-over-un-treaties
“”Senators who have either signed the letter of opposition to the treaty or verbally declared their opposition are DeMint, Vitter, Inhofe, Coburn, Paul, Chambliss, Rubio, Kyl, Cornyn, Lee, Sessions, Hatch, Crapo, Burr, Coats, Hoeven, Johnson, Roberts, Blunt, Boozman, Risch, Barasso, Shelby, Thune, Wicker, Jim Moran, Heller, McConnell, Toomey, Isakson, and Grassley.

The 16 Republicans who are either undecided or who have declared in favor of LOST are Ayotte, Graham, McCain, Murkowski, Hutchison, Brown, Alexander, Corker, Snowe, Collins, Cochran, Kirk, Lugar, Enzi, Johanns, and Portman.””


25 posted on 07/12/2012 8:55:22 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Ayotte as well was rumored to be Romney’s female pick for VP. I swear there is a disease rampant in Wash.D.C.! Far worse than the much spoken of “Potomac Fever!”


26 posted on 07/12/2012 8:56:04 AM PDT by donozark (Col. C.Beckwith:I'd rather go down the river with 7 studs than with a hundred shitheads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Isakson is now on record as voting no.

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-administration-faces-increasing-ire-over-un-treaties


27 posted on 07/12/2012 9:00:46 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Agreed. The U.N. is of no further use to the U.S. In fact, it is a drag on the U.S. The only way out of the U.N. is if the people demand it.


28 posted on 07/12/2012 9:01:04 AM PDT by RC2 (Buy American and support the Wounded Warrior Project whenever possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

I just got off the phone with Isakson’s office and they insist he does NOT support LOST. He voted against it in 2007 and has not changed his mind, per the phone answer babe. He is also against the UN arms grab.


29 posted on 07/12/2012 9:01:38 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost
In November we need to replace those on the list, who are up for re-election, with true conservatives. Give them the "Lugar" treatment.

The House needs to stand firm against this theft, disguised as a treaty.

Charlie, you're scaring me. A "true conservative" should understand that the House has no input at all in the ratification of treaties.

The Constitution provides for the Senate to approve or reject a resolution of ratification ... approval requires a 2/3 majority.

Start paying closer attention, it's important.

30 posted on 07/12/2012 9:01:50 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PCRit
Oh, they respond you betcha! Remember the Bush/McCain Amnesty Plan? Both of them initially support it via public statements. They were bitch-slapped back to the Stone Age by consituents! It does work. Have your friends, relatives and neighbors email or write them. Threaten the worst. They're quisling equivocators, but they know where their votes come from!
31 posted on 07/12/2012 9:02:05 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

I just got off the phone with Isakson’s office and they insist he does NOT support LOST. He voted against it in 2007 and has not changed his mind, per the phone answer babe. He is also against the UN arms grab.


32 posted on 07/12/2012 9:04:08 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Imagine that! Threatening these two works...Backsliders still though. They’re like a couple of two-year olds you have to constantly watch and correct. I’m getting tired of it. Time for some younger, stronger conservative blood here come the next Georgia Republican Senatorial Primary.


33 posted on 07/12/2012 9:04:55 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

KBH is a lost cause. She is leaving the Senate in January so she could care less if she destroys the nation before she leaves. It’s the politicians way.... :-/


34 posted on 07/12/2012 9:08:40 AM PDT by Sporke (USS Iowa BB-61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost
Emailed Isakson...

Loudly...

35 posted on 07/12/2012 9:09:27 AM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

“Rob Portman (OH),”

....and he is on the list for VP. I hope for the sake of the country he is not picked.


36 posted on 07/12/2012 9:14:13 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman; CharlesMartelsGhost
The Constitution provides for the Senate to approve or reject a resolution of ratification ... approval requires a 2/3 majority.

You may want to read this reply of mine to disabuse yourself of that 2/3 notion, tx_eggman.
In case you didn't know, tx_eggman, 2/3 of Senators present can ratify a treaty.

And you're worried about some else's status as a "true conservative" because of a statement?!
A "true conservative" should understand that the House has no input at all in the ratification of treaties.

37 posted on 07/12/2012 9:15:50 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

I note that Rob Portman, who is being flogged as a potential VP for Romney, is on the list.


38 posted on 07/12/2012 9:15:52 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Kay Bailey Hutchison too? Shouldn’t surprise me, but GOD, it galls me! Wonder what she’s getting to betray the nation?


39 posted on 07/12/2012 9:16:12 AM PDT by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Kay Bailey Hutchinson responding to my note yesterday said this vote wouldn’t come before Senate before next year. Said her term would be over before vote.


40 posted on 07/12/2012 9:30:28 AM PDT by 05kcir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson