Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't bother posting WND article "Blogger: Why don't blacks behave?"
July 14, 2012 | Vanity

Posted on 07/14/2012 9:22:51 PM PDT by Perseverando

I posted the above article by Colin Flaherty a couple of hours ago and it was pulled by the Moderator as being "too much." The article at WND begins with a video of a young black man named Mike Hagler who is basically asking (based on his observations) why blacks have to always be so violent at public events.

I posted one comment: ["Yes, I guess I'm a racist. You see I believe the human race is far superior to any other.

If I'm not mistaken, "race" originated with the secular humanists pushing evolution, eugenics and other such nonsense.

"Race" is a racist term used by racists. Can't we all just get along? How about if we use "people groups" instead?"]

I thought the article was pertinent, as we all know that there's a festering racial problem that is dividing us in America and that is being constantly stoked by BHO, his attorney general, minions, fellow community organizers, the MSM, and progressives in general, etc.

Apparently the subject will NOT be discussed here.

Yes, this is obviously a sensitive and very "politically incorrect" subject, but it is my understanding that we Freepers were not politically correct and had vowed to never bow to political correctness. Hey, if we can't discuss it here, then where can we discuss it?

The last time I checked the discussion several hours ago, I noticed that some of the comments were getting a little "harsh." If they were going over the top, then I believe the moderator should have deleted the comments as he deemed them inappropriate, or even locked the thread.

I just don't understand the need to delete this article from the vast archives of the news database that is Free Republic.

Anyway, I'm standing by to be taken to the wood shed for a spanking if I must.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackonwhite; racism; racist; toomuch; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: OneWingedShark

that’s rapist, isn’t it?


61 posted on 07/15/2012 5:01:30 AM PDT by Corwin of Amber (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pterional

I will never be a victim. I don’t need a gun to deal with a thug. They will never take away all the guns from my country neighbors. I so sad about my house fire and all my losses.


62 posted on 07/15/2012 5:28:37 AM PDT by WhirlwindAttack (Out in the country spring fed water. Off grid now. Sat internet. Gone Galt and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

How much less could you care?


63 posted on 07/15/2012 5:38:42 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

“Why don’t blacks behave?”
Maybe we could lock the blogger in a room with Thomas Sowell, J.C. Watts, Herman Cain, Condi Rice, Alan Keyes, Allen West and Clarence Thomas. Then he could ask them, “Why don’t you people behave?”


That was a great way to make your point that all people of a race are not all one thing; race has no one meaning. The title of the article in question lumped all Black people into the racist mob action in question. People should be measured by the content of their character - what they do and not by a one size fits all color meaning (stereotype) like liberal racists do to every race as they pit one against another for power.

All the people you mentioned denouce black racist violence because they are conservative just as the vast majority of whites would denounce white racist violence. On the other hand, you have the NOI, black racist liberal politicans like Eric Holder, atheletes and actors like Spike Lee encouraging black on white violence. They put out a message that thug power and hate is black power. Decent people would not enccourage it, cover it up or act like it’s no big deal in order to protect an illusion of superiority for of ‘our race.’ We would be abetting the racism if we did acted like racial violence is fine with us by covering it up or playing it down. See the old South or South Africa to know where that goes.

We are experiencing black racist mobs attacking whites. The fad of violent racism has happened in the past. The media called it wildin’ in the 90’s, and it is wrong to hide it and play it down like the media is doing today. The media is calling it ‘flash mobs’ today.

The Black racist individuals who are wrecking havoc on our society; crashing events and institutions with mean spiritedness and violence, have to be targeted by the police and stopped. It is inspired by thug rap, thug role models and gangs. Racial violence should be taboo. Law enforcement is the only way it will be stopped without whites putting down a bunch of St. Skittles in self defense. We either have the rule of the jungle or the rule of law.


64 posted on 07/15/2012 5:57:06 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“white deep southern Christian male over 45”

Dittos. As a group, our demographic are hard workers that are civilized and are the exact opposite of the modern inner-city hip-hop type.


65 posted on 07/15/2012 6:17:42 AM PDT by CodeToad (History says our end is near.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux
or maybe there is a racist mod here

There aren't any racists mods here, maybe overzealous or protective (that's their job). JimRob had to put the smackdown on one of them for me. I wish we could have identifiers for the mods.

The "one from Alabama" yanked every Arkansas sports thread about Bobby Petrino scandal thread I posted (Head coach in motorcycle accident and lost $32,000,000 for lying to boss about affair).....and I was chastised for FR not being a "Sports Forum" and to "go elsewhere".

I challenge you to count the DOZENS of threads of the Penn State/Sandusky pedo scandal.

66 posted on 07/15/2012 6:19:03 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (I'll take over the Mormon over the Moron any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Even blacks are getting tired of having to live in fear and tired of never having a good time without violence. Those outspoken few are right but the rest of the community won’t follow them. I know a black guy that bemoans black violence only to find out he is all for it when it comes to beating on white people. He’s a racist bigot. Most of the have-vs-havenot arguments are along racial lines.


67 posted on 07/15/2012 6:27:41 AM PDT by CodeToad (History says our end is near.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

You may disagree with the article.....but....it is there for the truth...truth will always be offensive for bad behavior.


68 posted on 07/15/2012 6:28:53 AM PDT by Bullfrogg (American by birth, Irish by heritage, and hellraiser by choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Vendome; Gene Eric
I didn’t read the article because I found the title itself offensive.

That's soooooo 'judging a book by it's cover' - so closed-minded - and not to be insulting but SO LIBERAL.

69 posted on 07/15/2012 6:40:04 AM PDT by GOPJ (Innocent people dying was the objective of Fast and Furious......... Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
Not all local media is so tolerant of the racial violence. After the “white girl bleed a lot” beating, talk show host James Harris, of 620 WTMJ in Milwaukee, told a television audience:

This was not a color-blind crime. We have this epidemic of black teenage mob violence happening all over the country.

It is from a perfect storm of entitlements, political correctness, and white guilt where people are afraid to identify who are doing the crimes and why they are doing it.

Here's a flash - I suspect this kind of stuff has something to do with why people don't want to hire black teens....

70 posted on 07/15/2012 6:58:06 AM PDT by GOPJ (Innocent people dying was the objective of Fast and Furious......... Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice; Perseverando; Vendome; Gene Eric
Maybe we could lock the blogger in a room with Thomas Sowell, J.C. Watts, Herman Cain, Condi Rice, Alan Keyes, Allen West and Clarence Thomas. Then he could ask them, "Why don't you people behave?"

I imagine everyone of them would agree with the message in the WND article - that there is an epidemic of black on white mob violence in this country that most people don't even know about because the MSM refuses to report it and the police often don't report it either. The article was full of examples.

Those who are blasting the article obviously haven't read it or watched it. You are examples of the truth it discloses

71 posted on 07/15/2012 7:12:25 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; wardaddy; CodeToad

Amen and well said.


72 posted on 07/15/2012 7:24:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

Whoa! thanks for the link, never saw that.


73 posted on 07/15/2012 8:26:37 AM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
This 'discussion' about race is a canard. The 'discussion' occurred in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act. The 'discussion' occurred with the establishment of affirmative action and the Equal Opportunity Commission. The 'discussion' occurred with the acceptance of the NAACP and the Congressional Black Causus (with no corresponding recognition to the other side of the 'coin')

The 'discussion' continued in 2008 with Holder's Black Panther Redux goons intimidating white people and Republicans at the polls in Philadelphia. The 'discussion' continued further when our illustrious, eminently qualified AG Holder (the same Holder who put together the Mark Rich Pardon for Clinton to sign) effectively said he wouldn't prosecute blacks for ANY hate crimes - no such thing, bro.

I don't want to hear another damned word about 'discussion'. I've had it with accomodating 'discussion' with racists. Nope, absolutely no white guilt here, nor is there a need to discuss anything. I'm done 'discussing'.

74 posted on 07/15/2012 8:36:55 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
This 'discussion' about race is a canard. The 'discussion' occurred in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act. The 'discussion' occurred with the establishment of affirmative action and the Equal Opportunity Commission. The 'discussion' occurred with the acceptance of the NAACP and the Congressional Black Causus (with no corresponding recognition to the other side of the 'coin')

The 'discussion' continued in 2008 with Holder's Black Panther Redux goons intimidating white people and Republicans at the polls in Philadelphia. The 'discussion' continued further when our illustrious, eminently qualified AG Holder (the same Holder who put together the Mark Rich Pardon for Clinton to sign) effectively said he wouldn't prosecute blacks for ANY hate crimes - no such thing, bro.

I don't want to hear another damned word about 'discussion'. I've had it with accomodating 'discussion' with racists. Nope, absolutely no white guilt here, nor is there a need to discuss anything. I'm done 'discussing'.

75 posted on 07/15/2012 8:36:55 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
This 'discussion' about race is a canard. The 'discussion' occurred in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act. The 'discussion' occurred with the establishment of affirmative action and the Equal Opportunity Commission. The 'discussion' occurred with the acceptance of the NAACP and the Congressional Black Causus (with no corresponding recognition to the other side of the 'coin')

The 'discussion' continued in 2008 with Holder's Black Panther Redux goons intimidating white people and Republicans at the polls in Philadelphia. The 'discussion' continued further when our illustrious, eminently qualified AG Holder (the same Holder who put together the Mark Rich Pardon for Clinton to sign) effectively said he wouldn't prosecute blacks for ANY hate crimes - no such thing, bro.

I don't want to hear another damned word about 'discussion'. I've had it with accomodating 'discussion' with racists. Nope, absolutely no white guilt here, nor is there a need to discuss anything. I'm done 'discussing'.

76 posted on 07/15/2012 8:37:01 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
This 'discussion' about race is a canard. The 'discussion' occurred in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act. The 'discussion' occurred with the establishment of affirmative action and the Equal Opportunity Commission. The 'discussion' occurred with the acceptance of the NAACP and the Congressional Black Causus (with no corresponding recognition to the other side of the 'coin')

The 'discussion' continued in 2008 with Holder's Black Panther Redux goons intimidating white people and Republicans at the polls in Philadelphia. The 'discussion' continued further when our illustrious, eminently qualified AG Holder (the same Holder who put together the Mark Rich Pardon for Clinton to sign) effectively said he wouldn't prosecute blacks for ANY hate crimes - no such thing, bro.

I don't want to hear another damned word about 'discussion'. I've had it with accomodating 'discussion' with racists. Nope, absolutely no white guilt here, nor is there a need to discuss anything. I'm done 'discussing'.

77 posted on 07/15/2012 8:37:01 AM PDT by Gaffer (NOVEMBER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Corwin of Amber
After the spell-check/auto-correct, yes.
78 posted on 07/15/2012 9:24:12 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer; Travis McGee
The 'discussion' occurred in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act

High Five to a 98er

but u would be shocked how many freepers applaud the Civil Rights acts...treat em like Moses brought em down the hill hisself

79 posted on 07/15/2012 10:07:24 AM PDT by wardaddy (this white hair don't cover up my redneck......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
I'm against a society that promotes sex over family, drugs over reality, communal apathy over individual endeavor and success.

Yew don't like Obama, do yew, boy?

80 posted on 07/15/2012 10:17:14 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1271 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson