Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama's birth certificate is fraudulent
LA Times ^ | July 18, 2012 | Michael Muskal

Posted on 07/18/2012 3:58:36 PM PDT by ckilmer

Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio says that volunteer investigators working for him have concluded that President Obama’s birth certificate is not legitimate.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: arpaio; birthcertificate; fraud; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: butterdezillion

And a fabricated birth certificate for a girl with the last name of Ah Nee was given to WorldNetDaily for the same reason. I said on my blog that I believed it to be a fabricated BC# intended to confuse the issue of how BC#’s were assigned. Ah Nee was born on Aug 23, but her BC# was 693 BEFORE Gretchen Nordyke’s, who was born on Aug 5th in the geographical area which was numbered first (the city of Honolulu).

The Ah Nee birth certificate number had to be fabricated, which I concluded based on 2 of the digits appearing to overlap. Because the digits were forged, this was probably not a case of the HDOH doing the fabrication of the BC#. But it’s an example of somebody using the Van Jones technique of feeding false information to a source trusted by the target group in order to deceive that target group. IOW, the Obots knew darn good and well this whole time that there was a BC# problem for Obama, and they resorted to FORGING records in order to try to deceive the public into thinking there wasn’t.

What’s really sad is that the HDOH itself - a government agency - did the same thing with Stig Waidelich’s BC#.

And this shows that Mike Zullo was dead-on when he said that the findings of this investigation suggest that ANY Hawaii birth certificate should be questioned. We have no way of knowing whether ANYTHING put out by that DOH office is even worth the paper it’s printed on. They have been caught 3 times now, falsifying official records (Waidelich’s BC#, the 1960-64 birth index, and Virginia Sunahara’s record in the database so that it wouldn’t show up when her name was queried).


21 posted on 07/18/2012 4:50:15 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

All you have to do is open the officially-released PDF file in Adobe Illustrator. It’s an obvious fake, with vector layers added right on top of a scanned image. Anyone with a basic understanding of PDF/vector graphics can see it in a matter of seconds.


22 posted on 07/18/2012 4:54:57 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter; biggredd1
"I didn’t hear Glenn Beck say anything either but as with Rush’s show I didn’t hear the whole thing."

As with Rush he did give it a mention. Glenn's program today was all about the book "The Communist" Obama's mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.

23 posted on 07/18/2012 4:56:24 PM PDT by Spunky (Those)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Thanks. Good to know.

Glen has mostly mocked this subject in the past.


24 posted on 07/18/2012 5:03:43 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chicken head

I will contribute.

Blessings, bobo


25 posted on 07/18/2012 5:07:57 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

What did he say about it? Did he mock it?


26 posted on 07/18/2012 5:08:15 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

I (think) can see the white haze behind the letters without any program like that. If my computer has been restarted or put on standby and I click it you can see a slight delay in the display of the letters; what appears first is the green background with the haze, then instantly, the typed letters appear over the haze.

If I close down the pdf and immediately do this again it doesn’t happen. It must have something to do with the RAM, or lack there of from my 5 year old computer. Not sure.


27 posted on 07/18/2012 5:12:16 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bobo1

Thanks a bunch- Just need a lawyer to do it..and i’m sure everyone on FR could put there heads together on this— I really think it would work..


28 posted on 07/18/2012 5:14:01 PM PDT by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter
Open this link in Illustrator and see for yourself.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Here's a fairly detailed, point-by-point explanation: http://www.wnd.com/files/2011/07/110726whitedots.pdf.

There are many similar websites and documents out there that explain it, followed by the back-and-forth arguments and hand-wringing/name-calling by leftists who can only conceive of government concealment when a Republican is in-office. But it was immediately apparent to me upon opening the file. Created on a Mac on the day the White House released the file, with multiple vector layers over a scanned image.

At the very least, the document is suspect because it is not a scan of the physical/original document. They didn't have Macs or PDFs in the 1960's people! Therefore, the original birth certificate was never released, irrespective of the PDF file.
29 posted on 07/18/2012 5:19:30 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Someone in the studio was prompting Rush to comment. Rush said he would let it “effervesce on its own out there.” Not a peep on Drudge at the moment.
30 posted on 07/18/2012 5:28:57 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (let establishment heads explode)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Honestly I can't tell you exactly what he said. It comes on at 6:00 a.m. here and I was half asleep. I know he reports on what The Blaze has on top so he might have been talking about what The Blaze said.

The Blaze

31 posted on 07/18/2012 5:46:16 PM PDT by Spunky (Those)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

interesting


32 posted on 07/18/2012 5:48:58 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson