The issue of whether or not the BC was electronically generated is a technical one that the LATimes doesn’t bother to explain or refute.
Like any technical issue, the facts once presented should be easily verifiable or refutable by others looking at the same evidence. But the Times would have to present it first.
They prefer to present the opinion of someone who hasn’t seen the evidence and then proceed to ridicule. That kind of thing, in place of dispelling doubt, just makes me all the more suspicious.
sheriff arpaio should have mentioned rush limbaugh in a sentence or two then limbaugh would have played the sound bite. limbaugh said not ONE word about the obama fraud and forgery.
Every news room has a graphics department with computers and people skilled in photo shop.
THEY ALL KNOW.
There was nothing in this article that couldn’t have been written 4 months ago. Lazy journalism at best.
Wisch was never authorized to see Obama’s birth record. Why did they talk to Wisch? Why not talk to HDOH Director Fuddy or, even better yet, Alvin Onaka - the only 2 people at the HDOH office currently who have been authorized to see the record? Asking Wisch when he has no way of knowing - according to the HDOH’s own claims - is like asking a blind man what color a pair of mittens is.
Ridiculous.
“There is no such thing as bad publicity.”