Posted on 07/18/2012 3:58:36 PM PDT by ckilmer
Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio says that volunteer investigators working for him have concluded that President Obama’s birth certificate is not legitimate.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
The issue of whether or not the BC was electronically generated is a technical one that the LATimes doesn’t bother to explain or refute.
Like any technical issue, the facts once presented should be easily verifiable or refutable by others looking at the same evidence. But the Times would have to present it first.
They prefer to present the opinion of someone who hasn’t seen the evidence and then proceed to ridicule. That kind of thing, in place of dispelling doubt, just makes me all the more suspicious.
I’m surprised that no one has charged barry or pelosi with treason - there is (2) witnesses that say his document is forged- sheriff joe and mike zullu.. if there is a lawyer on here with the balls to do it - i’ll pay for it
For comparison about 6,500 for "Romney Taxes" in the last day. Broken out into two main categories, the second of which is headed with this lovely title:
"Romney, the Senate GOP and the Right-Wing Secrecy Machine
Huffington Post - 8 hours ago
The only conclusion to draw from Romney's tax-return reticence is that there's something he doesn't want us to see. The recent revelations that ...
Losing! My TeamDonk rivals are already gloating over who is going to replace Romney on the ticket.
LA times....
Sheriff Joe should pass out press releases every now and then until actions are taken. Keep these legs growing.
sheriff arpaio should have mentioned rush limbaugh in a sentence or two then limbaugh would have played the sound bite. limbaugh said not ONE word about the obama fraud and forgery.
The lamestream media will have to give this story legs for anything to happen. Don’t see it in the near future.
How are the claims by the Sheriff “misrepresenting Hawaii law”, Mr. Wisch?
And if Obama’s HAWAII birth certificate is valid, then why wouldn’t Alvin Onaka verify as true any of the items from that birth certificate? And why would he not verify that what was posted online was a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”?
See, when these people are not under oath or in court, they lie as easily as they breathe. And sometimes even when they ARE under oath or in court.
I’d like to hear Wisch give the legal justification for saying that Obama was born in Honolulu. What authorizes him to say that? For that matter, what authorized Chiyome Fukino to publicly disclose information from a birth certificate? As long as they are just blowing claims out their rear end they can say whatever they want. But when Alvin Onaka was presented with that verification request application he was required by law to only verify what is considered legally true - and he was required to verify EVERYTHING that was submitted for verification if it was considered legally true. Those are very specific rules. Onaka was not authorized to blow comments out of his rear end. And in that context, he refused to verify as legally true ANYTHING from Obama’s birth record.
Wisch’s only justification for saying the things he has said is ignorance. Onaka can’t claim ignorance, nor can he claim leeway to fudge his response. The difference between those 2 contexts (Wisch and Fukino’s wing-it statements to the press, versus Onaka’s strictly-dictated-by-law responses) is night and day.
Every news room has a graphics department with computers and people skilled in photo shop.
THEY ALL KNOW.
Rush knows the story will go nowhere and just bring more ridicule on him and Arpaio. The Media has to serve the truth to have a free country.
There was nothing in this article that couldn’t have been written 4 months ago. Lazy journalism at best.
Wisch was never authorized to see Obama’s birth record. Why did they talk to Wisch? Why not talk to HDOH Director Fuddy or, even better yet, Alvin Onaka - the only 2 people at the HDOH office currently who have been authorized to see the record? Asking Wisch when he has no way of knowing - according to the HDOH’s own claims - is like asking a blind man what color a pair of mittens is.
Ridiculous.
know? It probably originated at CNN.
“There is no such thing as bad publicity.”
the story of posting a fraudulent and forged document online by the commie usurper is just a story? Maybe Rush should have done three hours on batman instead of one hour.
Someday Sheriff Joe and his Posse will be vindicated in time. Truth will prevail even if delayed by the darkness of the present.
Interesting that you bring up CNN...
Based on what Verna Lee said, there is no way that Stig WAidelich was given a BC# 282 later than Gretchen Nordyke, who was born 28 minutes before him. For 282 people to be born in those 28 minutes would require a birth rate 336 times the birth rate in Honolulu for August of 1961.
The HDOH fabricated a BC# for Stig Waidelich to make it appear that BC#’s were not issued sequentially (in order to try to explain away Obama’s BC# discrepancy). And in order to get that false BC# out into the public they arranged a stunt with CNN, where CNN would focus on Stig Waidelich and have him order his BC and pick up the COLB straight from the HDOH office while the CNN cameras videotaped, including the BC#.
By about 6am the morning after that segment by Gary Tuchmann aired on CNN on April 25, 2011... an Obama supporter submitted a comment on my blog asking whether I had seen Stig Waidelich’s BC# and that it contradicted what I was saying about Obama’s BC# being a discrepancy.
That segment showing the BC# that was specifically fabricated by the HDOH for CNN cameras was re-aired on May 30th, when Mike Zullo was in Hawaii investigating the fraud surrounding Obama’s BC. That’s TWICE that CNN aired the stunt that they worked out with the HDOH in order to get FALSIFIED records into the public eye.
So when you mention CNN, they actually DID play a hand in a fabricated birth certificate: Stig Waidelich’s. With the help of the HDOH itself.
This is much, much bigger than Rathergate.
This is all that Dem Wonks at work rant over. Polly parroting their MSM feeders like good little DemBots.
I believe that the story should be spread with viciousness and ridicule. I can’t believe the lack of the will of pubs to not pursue this. Bunch of sissybitches devoid of balls.
God, I wish Palin was the nominee. She has more than all the other pubs combined.
When I was a young man, I had to show ID to buy adult beverages, to buy smokes, which we still have to do, but now, you can vote, and even become president without any identification at all.
So we get a fraud in office, a fascist/communist/socialist, without papers to prove who he is. And the RATS continue this hypocrisy.
I have convinced three people to vote against the obamanation in the next election, whom have never voted before.
The nation is at a crossroads, na, romney was not my choice, but I will do everything I can do to keep this fascist from having a second term.
Blessings, Bobo
Actually he did say something. Said he was going to see how it plays out. I was in and out of Rush today and it was a needle in a hay stack catching it as I did.
I didn’t hear Glenn Beck say anything either but as with Rush’s show I didn’t hear the whole thing.
A local guy in my town mentioned it towards the end of his show.
J.D. Hayworth was filling in for Mike Church and he talked about it for around 20 minutes straight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.