Posted on 07/23/2012 2:36:16 PM PDT by scottjewell
Well, if the point was to have a gay friendly BSA equivalent, they'd do just that. But the point is to destroy the BSA. This is the same goal with "marriage".
How many gays have condemned Sandusky?
You hit the nail right on the old head, Durus. Well said.
“Wouldn’t someone look with suspicion on a man who volunteers to be the towel boy for a junior high girls volleyball team?”
Ummm.....Scout leaders are never alone with a boy and surely not sharing a space like that. We enforce that rigidly.
Boy Scouting is eat up with lesbians. They are drawn to the outdoorsy butch thing with their sons. I used to run into them all the time at Scout camp. They keep their mouths shut about it.
There was talk about creating a gay-friendly version of Scouts but gay men don’t trust each other like that. They’d never let their son join because they know it would be a predator’s dream.
Good point, and they are afraid to touch the subject with a ten foot pole for obvious reasons.
What's the difference? We all know they like boys. I put this in the same category as Sandusky. Spanier didn't want to report it because it might hurt the gay agenda he brought with him to Penn State.
Point!
I don’t know of a single one.
Yes, I was once watching an A&E biography on the (gay) American playwright Tennesse Williams. His brother was interviewed in the segment, and he said, “My brother was a natural born homosexual, and he liked boys, and the younger the better.” He nailed it.
Hey, it’s real simple ~ the condition is defined by the act ~ not the age of the victims.
Bingo. Truth, and no one can argue with it. A man who looks specifically for BOYS is NOT acting in a heterosexual way. There are many points of contact between the homosexual and the pedophile, but the Rainbow Agenda says, no, no, no.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
“Hey, it’s real simple ~ the condition is defined by the act ~ not the age of the victims.”
Right. You could also say, “The condition is defined by the gender of the victims and not their age”.
Yes, mountains of evidence sponsored by the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
I knew a gay guy in college that loved to quip "Love those fat butt boys."
Wouldn't it seem logical that the second perversion would be easier to adopt than the first?
Could homosexuality serve as a "gateway" perversion?
“Could homosexuality serve as a “gateway” perversion?”
Indeed, I think it is a gateway - while not specifically to pedophilia, (if the object of attention here would be ages 5-10 or so) at least to seeking out minors (age 13-15). This in itself could lead to “exceptions” (an occasional 10 or 11 year old).
While pedophilia may be different from homosexuality, with male on male sexuality I would say it is a difference not in kind, but in degree. Hence the danger of a slippery slope. But of course Mr. Badash will have none of this.
If boys are on his menu, he is a homosexual.
correct, funny how the pro queer media ignore that point.
As soon as a man tocuhes a boy then not only is he a child molester but also a homosexual and therefore should be counted but alas we look at most serial killers in this country and how they too were either homosexuals, cross dressers or had sidings for it.
Lets face facts you and I kno this but so many are ignorant about facts and instead repeat the same old tired line or”well I know a couple and they are nice”
Just wrote this on another thread if you get the time.
peaking of which I’ve just got back from the marine recruiting office as my oldest wanted to go.
\The marine asked me if I had questions and I told him that I did and went on to ask about will he be forced to share a room, share a shower or even a sleeping bag during survival training etc.
Lets put it this way the military now is nothing but a political correctness establishment and his reply was/
“no sir he would never be forced to do anything like that and that would never happen or no one would ever come onto your son”
I asked what guarantee could you give and what does he mean he would not be forced into sharing a room etc.
His reply was” well, this would never happen and if your son felt he did not want to share a room then he would not do so” etc etc etc.
Then said the members of the military would never do that , oh really how about Manning, marching in freak parades in uniform, 4 homo marines in CA who lied to get married quarters etc.
The marine was full of B/S who went on to tell me his record was serving 4 years with the President.
I asked that women have a different qualification to get in but can they serve along side my son to which he replied no they do the same physical except pulls ups, running and weight.
er that is different not the same and yes they can now go to combat along side my son even though they have not done the same physical tests.
One pull up to get in for a woman, two for a guy.
To finish training he said 4 pulls ups, 55 sits ups in two mins, and a 3 mile run in shorts , sneakers and shirt in 28 mins.
Hell I can still do that now, where as the British royal marine commando have to go 30 miles across cross country , swamps, marches and hills in 8 hours and carry their battle kit. Don’t allow women or women in combat
Just what on earth has happened to the Pentagon, the military etc?
Will Romney and the GOP have any guts to overturn this madness, hell no.
Spoke to a vet marine an hour ago and after I told him what this recruiting SGT told me the vet said he’s embarrassed how the military has turned
correct, funny how the pro queer media ignore that point.
As soon as a man tocuhes a boy then not only is he a child molester but also a homosexual and therefore should be counted but alas we look at most serial killers in this country and how they too were either homosexuals, cross dressers or had sidings for it.
Lets face facts you and I kno this but so many are ignorant about facts and instead repeat the same old tired line or”well I know a couple and they are nice”
Just wrote this on another thread if you get the time.
peaking of which I’ve just got back from the marine recruiting office as my oldest wanted to go.
\The marine asked me if I had questions and I told him that I did and went on to ask about will he be forced to share a room, share a shower or even a sleeping bag during survival training etc.
Lets put it this way the military now is nothing but a political correctness establishment and his reply was/
“no sir he would never be forced to do anything like that and that would never happen or no one would ever come onto your son”
I asked what guarantee could you give and what does he mean he would not be forced into sharing a room etc.
His reply was” well, this would never happen and if your son felt he did not want to share a room then he would not do so” etc etc etc.
Then said the members of the military would never do that , oh really how about Manning, marching in freak parades in uniform, 4 homo marines in CA who lied to get married quarters etc.
The marine was full of B/S who went on to tell me his record was serving 4 years with the President.
I asked that women have a different qualification to get in but can they serve along side my son to which he replied no they do the same physical except pulls ups, running and weight.
er that is different not the same and yes they can now go to combat along side my son even though they have not done the same physical tests.
One pull up to get in for a woman, two for a guy.
To finish training he said 4 pulls ups, 55 sits ups in two mins, and a 3 mile run in shorts , sneakers and shirt in 28 mins.
Hell I can still do that now, where as the British royal marine commando have to go 30 miles across cross country , swamps, marches and hills in 8 hours and carry their battle kit. Don’t allow women or women in combat
Just what on earth has happened to the Pentagon, the military etc?
Will Romney and the GOP have any guts to overturn this madness, hell no.
Spoke to a vet marine an hour ago and after I told him what this recruiting SGT told me the vet said he’s embarrassed how the military has turned
I, for one, have no problem with homosexuality and pedophilia being all lumped together in a list of deviances from which to protect children.
“If boys are on his menu, he is a homosexual.”
You cut straight through the BS and to the simple truth.
Our sons will be old enough to join the Boy Scouts in a few years. And what bothers me about the prospect of gay leaders is not so much that my sons might be molested (though of course that concerns me deeply). What I see as a more immediate and hard to fight danger is simply holding someone with obvious homosexual tendencies up to boys as a “leader” and someone to emulate. Here in California, I see young men all the time who are not gay ... but who ACT like the biggest queers on the planet. They have picked up these queer mannerisms as being somehow cool, and I swear I meet young men all the time who lisp, posture and generally act like queens. Yet they are shacking up with young women, etc., so if they are indeed gay it’s only part-time. I am forced to conclude that a very gay-friendly culture, like we have here in CA, promotes the posturing that we see in the gay culture. I DO NOT want my boys picking that up as being “cool.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.