Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Pennsylvania psychologist says he reported child molestation, lost license (1986)
The Daily Caller ^ | 7-30-2012 | Michael Volpe

Posted on 07/30/2012 7:36:31 AM PDT by servo1969

Jim Singer, formerly a psychologist working in Pennsylvania, said that he reported a case of child molestation in 1986 to Pennsylvania’s Child Protective Services agency, and not only was his report ignored, but soon after, in retaliation, the Pennsylvania Psychology Board prosecuted Singer and eventually removed his license to practice psychology.

As the aftermath of the Penn State University molestation scandal unfolds, most observers believe that if the proper authorities had been alerted to the crimes much earlier, many children could have been saved. That’s not always the case, says Singer.

Speaking exclusively with The Daily Caller, Singer said that most of the same Pennsylvania government agencies that were outraged over the PSU scandal — Child Protective Services, the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, and the Pennsylvania State Police — all ignored and buried his report of child molestation.

In 1986, Singer was working as a psychologist at the Dubois Regional Medical Center in Dubois, Pa. During a session with a female teenage patient, Singer said the patient revealed to him that she was being sexually abused by her father. Upon having two more medical professionals confirm this, Singer said that he reported the abuse to the state’s Child Protective Services agency.

TheDC has exclusively acquired a letter from one of the two medical professionals, Dr. Albert Varacallo, vouching for the veracity of Singer’s claims.

“If all this seems hard to believe,” Varacallo wrote to then-Pennsylvania Gov. Bob Casey, Sr. in 1991, “I agree with you … the events of the past three years have proven to me that this nightmare is indeed a reality and not just Mr. Singer’s imagination from the stand point of any health professional, once he knew all the facts.”

“While the state is supposed to provide immunity for reporters,” Varacallo wrote, “it actually prosecutes those who seek to protect the rights of children.”

And according to a letter written by the alleged victim to Singer, she credits him with saving her life.

“I told her [the CPS case worker] that I went to Dr. Singer three weeks ago and asked him for help. I told her that if it weren’t for him, I’d be dead right now. She asked why and I told her I’d run away or commit suicide or both.”

Singer said he wasn’t merely duty bound by medical ethics and humanity to report the abuse, but by the law.

“I would have been prosecuted if I didn’t report the abuse,” Singer said.

As a psychologist and medical professional, Singer was mandated to report the abuse. By law, a failure to report would result in criminal and civil penalties. As a mandated reporter, he was also due protections like anonymity.

Instead, Singer said his name was leaked not only to the abuser but some of his other patients. In 1991, speaking anonymously to a local investigative reporter about Singer’s case, here’s what an individual that also reported child abuse recalled CPS agents saying to her:

“They [CPS officials] kept pressuring me to say something against him [Singer] and I kept telling them I didn’t know him. They then proceeded to tell me that Dr. Singer had reported child abuse. Before they left my home, I knew that Dr. Singer had reported child abuse. I knew who the perpetrator was and I knew who the victim was.”

In the same report, a female patient, also given anonymity, also claimed that CPS officials attempted to pressure her into saying bad things against Singer.

“They were trying to get us to go against Dr. Singer,” continuing, “we didn’t feel any of it was true.”

Watch the Action News report: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTGk6aD8hQ0

Singer said that the retaliation only started with his identity being leaked. Within a year of filing the complaint, he said that a number of complaints were filed with the Pennsylvania Psychology Board, including some by the accuser.

The Pennsylvania Psychology Board (PPB) did not respond to TheDC’s requests for comment for this report.

Citing standard policy against commenting on individual cases, Pennsylvania’s CPS also declined to comment.

Singer said he practiced psychology for fifteen years with a perfect record prior to facing these numerous allegations, which ranged from ethics complaints to billing complaints. For much of the next decade, Singer said he was forced to defend himself against these charges, and they’ve destroyed his career and depleted most of his savings.

Finally, on October 26, 1992, the PPB issued a decree fining Singer as well as suspending his license to practice psychology. The suspension was stayed, with Singer being given numerous stipulations to keep his license active.

Singer said he refused to sign the order and he appealed the decree immediately. The appeal would never be heard and instead, his license to practice psychology was revoked a few weeks later. Since that time, he has not been able to reinstate his license.

In 1996, Singer thought that he had finally caught the break he was looking for. Upon receiving a job with Pennsylvania’s prison system, a routine background check was run. That background check turned into an investigation of Singer’s case run by a Pennsylvania State Trooper named Lieutenant Ivan Hoover.

Hoover’s investigation was meticulous, and the summary was thirty three pages. Lt. Hoover verified Singer’s telling of the story, and concluded that Pennsylvania authorities committed numerous criminal acts in prosecuting Singer. Those acts, according to Hoover’s report, included fabrication of evidence and perjury.

Hoover’s report appears to have never gained traction and a grand jury was never convened. Lt. Hoover has since retired from the Pennsylvania State Troopers and could not be reached for this report.

Singer told TheDC that it’s what Hoover didn’t find during his investigation that’s even more important. He said that Lt. Hoover could not find any record of an investigation even being started into Singer’s 1986 report of child molestation.

Beyond alleged criminal acts, Pennsylvania officials have also made a number of factually inaccurate statements both in public and in correspondence with politicians.

As part of the 1991 investigative report, State Department Chief Counsel Pamela Raison claimed that Singer was not a mandated reporter, and that he would have had to come into contact with the alleged perpetrator to be a mandated reporter.

“In order to be a mandated reporter, you have to come into contact with the person that you are reporting within the context of your profession,” said Raison in that report.

Even more than twenty years later, Singer still scoffs at that notion.

“That would mean only someone that saw Jerry Sandusky commit his crimes would be considered a mandated reporter,” said Singer.

In 1998, Colonel Paul Evanko of the Pennsylvania State Police, writing to Pennsylvania State Senator William J. Slocum, claimed that Singer had agreed to a punishment from the Pennsylvania Psychology Board and that his license was removed after Singer didn’t comply with the order.

“A review of Dr. Singer’s case revealed that following a hearing before a disciplinary board, Dr. Singer entered into a consent decree with the Department of State, Dr. Singer agreed to pay a fine, and, following a period of supervision, would be able to keep his license to practice. When Dr. Singer failed to comply, his license was suspended.”

An analysis of the decree document concludes that it was an order and not a voluntary agreement and TheDC could find no evidence that Singer ever agreed to it.

Throughout Singer’s ordeal, he’s been helped by a number of high profile political figures both in Pennsylvania and the nation at large. On October 14, 1993, then-U.S. Congressman Rick Santorum wrote a letter to then-President Bill Clinton on Singer’s behalf.

“I am writing on behalf of Dr. James Singer, a psychologist from Dubois, Pennsylvania, I would like to join my colleagues Senator Specter, Congressman Bud Shuster, Congressman Tom Ridge, and Congressman Bud Cramer, who have expressed their concern to you over the handling of Dr. Singer’s case by the state and federal governments as a result of his mandated reporting of an alleged case of child abuse in 1986.”

On April 12, 1994, then-U.S. Rep. Tom Ridge sent a letter to Clinton’s Attorney General, Janet Reno, also in support of Singer.

“My concern was and continues to be the lack of attention given to the case of Dr. James Singer of Dubois, Pennsylvania. Several years ago, Dr. Singer was asked to give his opinion of a child abuse case at Dubois Medical Center. He concluded that the child had been abused, and because he was mandated by both state and federal laws to report any suspected child abuse, Dr. Singer reported his findings to Children and Youth Services. He had been informed that if he failed to report his findings, he would have been prosecuted for violating Pennsylvania’s Child Protective Services Law. Because Dr. Singer obeyed the law, his life was destroyed.”

Given what has transpired at Penn State University, it was the correspondence of Sam Stein, then a state senator in Pennsylvania, that was most eerie.

In a letter to Rita Olzewski, the executive director of the Health Systems Development Corporation, Stein expressed his deep concern that Singer’s case would discourage people in the future from reporting on child abuse.

“Please understand I have serious concerns regarding the impact that Jim Singer’s case will have on child abuse reporting by professionals,” wrote Stein. “It is obvious that such irresponsibility, on the part of the Departments of State and Public Welfare, will cause more and more mandated reporters to think twice before reporting suspected child abuse.”

Most recently, Sen. Barbara Mikulski wrote a letter in January 2012 to the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office pleading that an investigation be conducted into Singer’s case.

“I am writing to bring to your attention of the attached correspondence and documents from my constituent, James Singer [who now lives in Maryland], regarding a case of child abuse that he has brought to the attention of Pennsylvania law enforcement,” wrote Mikulski. “I respectfully ask that you review the materials attached.” Sen. Mikulski’s office did not respond to a request for comment on this report.

TheDC attempted to contact a number of Pennsylvania state officials as well as national officials like Sen. Dick Durbin, and only the office of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee responded. An aide in the Judiciary Committee told TheDC via email that they were aware of Singer’s case, but that the Judiciary Committee did not have jurisdiction.

“Dr. Singer’s complaint is with the state of Pennsylvania. The House Judiciary Committee is a federal legislative body — our investigative authority is focused on misconduct or malfeasance of the federal agencies over which we have jurisdiction (i.e. U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security). Our staff advised Dr. Singer that he should direct his request to investigative bodies within the state of Pennsylvania.”

Singer told TheDC that he hopes sharing his story will finally lead to a full investigation of his ordeal.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: child; homosexualagenda; jimsinger; molestation; pedstate; psychologist; psychology; sandusky
So...

Who were they protecting?

1 posted on 07/30/2012 7:36:46 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Times have changed. Now it’s a crime if you don’t report it.


2 posted on 07/30/2012 7:39:49 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Ambition Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I believe it was a crime then as well.


“Singer said he wasn’t merely duty bound by medical ethics and humanity to report the abuse, but by the law.

“I would have been prosecuted if I didn’t report the abuse,” Singer said.

As a psychologist and medical professional, Singer was mandated to report the abuse. By law, a failure to report would result in criminal and civil penalties. As a mandated reporter, he was also due protections like anonymity.

Instead, Singer said his name was leaked not only to the abuser but some of his other patients.”


3 posted on 07/30/2012 7:45:07 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Read the story. It was a crime not to report it then. so he did.


4 posted on 07/30/2012 7:45:27 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Now it’s a crime if you don’t report it.

If you had read the article, you would know that it was a crime then as well.

5 posted on 07/30/2012 7:46:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Who were they protecting?

Someone who had some pull with the police department and the Medical Board.

6 posted on 07/30/2012 7:46:43 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

What is it with the State of Pennsylvania? Has it become a haven for homosexual pedophiles? No wonder it hasn’t voted Republican in a Presidential election since 1988.


7 posted on 07/30/2012 7:48:33 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Obama does not have the work ethic to be Anti-Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

EXACTLY!!!


8 posted on 07/30/2012 7:48:39 AM PDT by rejoicing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

And it would have been a crime then too. He was a mandatory reporter.


9 posted on 07/30/2012 7:49:44 AM PDT by agere_contra (Vote ABO. Don't choose the Greater Evil and then boast about how principled you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Thanks All. It’s late, I’m tired and didn’t get the gist of it.


10 posted on 07/30/2012 7:53:41 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Ambition Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

My question exactly? Who is the perpetrator? What official position does he hold? Who are his friends in high places that they would go to such lengths?


11 posted on 07/30/2012 7:57:04 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (As long a hundred of us remain alive we will never on any condition be brought under Obama's rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

That’s the question. The molester was obviously some “fine, upstanding member of the community” (probably a Dem politician) who had a lot of pull.


12 posted on 07/30/2012 7:58:01 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I got the “This is a REPORTED ATTACK SITE” warning from Firefox which I often find happens with stories that embarrass leftists and perverts. Just ignore the warning and continue to the site.


13 posted on 07/30/2012 7:58:01 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Who were they protecting?


Good question, knowing how these things go it was not a “nobody”. Ipso Facto it was a “SOMEBODY” who had pull or knew of the skeletons in the closet of high ranking public officials.

You noticed that the Therapist doesn’t name the abuser? Probably because they are still around and can cause even more damage.


14 posted on 07/30/2012 7:58:50 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The Pennsylvania Psychology Board (PPB) did not respond to The DC’s requests for comment for this report.

The Psychology profession has been owned by the Gay mafia ever since their thugocracy pressured the board to classify homosexuality as normal rather than the mental disorder under which it was so classified back in the early 1970's.

Mark my words. One of the next things on their agenda is to get first the most mild forms of child sexual abuse (exposure, touching, etc.) classified as harmless experimentation and then expand the definition to more invasive forms. If they're not stopped soon, I'd give it only a decade or so.

15 posted on 07/30/2012 8:05:47 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

Predators go to where the prey are.

They also put in place a protective backup system to prevent their capture.


16 posted on 07/30/2012 8:06:45 AM PDT by edcoil (It is not over until I win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I hope this guy sues their asses for all the income he potentially lost over those years and 10 TIMES that for punitive damages, to come out of the personal bank accounts of anyone involved


17 posted on 07/30/2012 8:07:51 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum [of good]")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This problem is far more prevalent than any of us even imagines. Perverts of all stripes have free reign in this country. The only time we hear about it is when something happens that is just too big to cover up. Good people are put down by corrupt organizations and their lives destroyed to protect these deviants.

If Americans ever get the courage to take back this country we will find horrors have been committed we do not even consider at this point.


18 posted on 07/30/2012 8:08:52 AM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I wonder if he got on someone’s $h!t list and use that report as a means to let him have it ?


19 posted on 07/30/2012 8:10:45 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Someone with lots of ‘juice’, apparently.


20 posted on 07/30/2012 8:11:06 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This is NOT a case of the system failing, it is a case of the system attacking someone for upholding and following the law! Pennsylvania is having a real spotlight shown on its governmental abuses that have been hidden for years. Remember the Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges that got paid to send kids to prison? There were a lot of kids who’s futures were permanently damaged before these scumbags got caught.

Unfortunately, it will be another state next week because no governmental system is immune to corruption. I know of no answer to this unfortunate result of the “human condition”!


21 posted on 07/30/2012 8:22:54 AM PDT by SES1066 (Government is NOT the reason for my existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: formosa

Perverts of all stripes have free reign in this country. The only time we hear about it is when something happens that is just too big to cover up. Good people are put down by corrupt organizations and their lives destroyed to protect these deviants.

If Americans ever get the courage to take back this country we will find horrors have been committed we do not even consider at this point.


I’ve said it before on other threads... When the SHTF I expect that a lot of people who feel/know they have been wronged are going to take that chaotic opportunity to get revenge. It’s going to get very ugly during that time.


22 posted on 07/30/2012 8:26:34 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Well-connected family members have related horrifying stories to me about how back in the day the local cops and politicians would get together to assist the Catholic Church in covering-up these incidents. And since JoePa was the most powerful man in this state aside from the Governor, one could easily imagine such things happening if an allegation regarding Penn State came to light.


23 posted on 07/30/2012 8:31:25 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople
What is it with the State of Pennsylvania? Has it become a haven for homosexual pedophiles?

"During a session with a female teenage patient, Singer said the patient revealed to him that she was being sexually abused by her father."

24 posted on 07/30/2012 8:37:24 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
"the events of the past three years have proven to me that this nightmare is indeed a reality"

"Nightmare." Interesting choice of words. Who indeed were they protecting, and why? Sometimes, however, it simply boils down to bureaucratic cowardice. That's when they decide to "kill the messenger."

I faced the same type of retaliation within my own organization for doing as the good doctor did. It involved a child molester. We were directed to sweep it under the rug, let the abuser resign in good standing, and move on. I refused to lie. When questioned by investigators I spoke the truth. All hell broke loose because everyone above me in the chain of command had lied.

Why? They were cowards who openly expressed fear of being sued by the abuser in court. Had it not been for the fact my testimony triggered a ground swell of corroborating and recanted statements from others, well let's just say it would have been a very different world for me today.

25 posted on 07/30/2012 8:43:34 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I wonder what ever happened to the young girl?


26 posted on 07/30/2012 8:46:32 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

The entire state buries it’s collective head when it comes to child abuse. I grew up in PA, and there were numerous Catholic priests who were taken out of one parish for child sex abuse, and whisked off to prey on innocent children in another.

No one wanted to admit stuff like this went on. And all the while, more children had their lives ruined.


27 posted on 07/30/2012 8:51:06 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
"I know of no answer to this unfortunate result of the “human condition”!

I do. It's why I require my associates and leaders to have a moral compass. I never allow immoral men to attain positions of authority. I always insist upon following only "bloodied leadership."
28 posted on 07/30/2012 9:15:02 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
"Times have changed. Now it’s a crime if you don’t report it. "

Times have NOT changed- it was a crime back then as well.

29 posted on 07/30/2012 10:00:07 AM PDT by matthew fuller (I will be voting for the real American for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Exactly, you are 100% correct, why stop with molestation or gay marriage, soon, they will say a man or woman has a right to marry his or her pets! You wait, the democrats see every sick, perverted, vile behavior as a civil rights issue, so, perversions and amoral behaviors are seen as being human rights, minorities in need of representation, men and women whose human rights are being violated, the Democrat’s platform is Anti-christ, without a doubt, the law of God has no place within their platform, the rule of man is the whole of their law!


30 posted on 07/30/2012 12:51:22 PM PDT by IslamE (epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I would guess that it was an entire group of pedophiles, most with state jobs in the CSP.


31 posted on 07/30/2012 3:12:28 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Singer said that most of the same Pennsylvania government agencies that were outraged over the PSU scandal — Child Protective Services, the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, and the Pennsylvania State Police — all ignored and buried his report of child molestation.

No wonder Sandusky got away with it for so long.

32 posted on 07/31/2012 5:36:31 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson