Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Scroll down. I found a free source, albeit with occasional interruptions from its start on page 24 to the end on page 40. Somehow I found the current issue of Foreign Affairs.
1 posted on 08/03/2012 4:23:40 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
“Dr Keith Suter shares Club of Rome membership with 100 other people including Bill Gates, Al Gore and Jimmy Carter”

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-06-05/club-of-rome-member-warns-against-council/58734

When looking back at the last 40 years, this makes a lot of sense.

They are the gods that would be.

2 posted on 08/03/2012 4:54:08 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The myth of finite resources:

Once upon a time, there was a widespread belief that a real but not fully defined maximum possible output of petroleum would one day occur, so-called “peak oil”. Using the technology of 1972, we would have arrived at that point already, but - SURPRISE! - it did not happen. Old ideas about the formation and distribution of resources have been knocked into cocked hats by a restless and relentless voyage of discovery into newer and more effective means of extracting and processing the raw materials from the sea and the earth below.

Turns out, only a very small fraction of all petroleum is formed as a result of “dinosaur soup” fermenting for millions of years beneath the layers of sedimentary rock overlying these deposits. There are a number of theories advanced as to how the deposits of petroleum may be formed by entirely abiotic means, and in fact, these conditions can be reproduced both in the laboratory, and now, in certain instances, on an industrial scale. And these are by means already known by technicians and scientists for decades now, so there is no lack of intelligent effort being applied, only lagging attitudes.

The very definition of “resources” varies, depending on the development of technology to take advantage of the extraction of the needed resource from the site where it is embedded. Once, uranium was a strange element that had the capability of glowing, but not much else was known at the time. Today, it stands as the gateway substance to truly powerful weaponry, or alternately, as a source of energy to run power plants. But uranium is by no means the ultimate energy source, and in fact, is rather scarce throughout the world, as compared to, say, thorium, which is both much more plentiful, and with proper adaptation, a more tractable and manageable source of atomic energy with which to run a power generation plant.

The point is, that with what appears to be a growing scarcity of one resource, may be in fact the inspiration to substitute another (and cheaper) resource that provides the same, or sometimes much more, benefit.

But if it isn’t cheaper for the user, it will not be adopted. Something that the “smart guys” cannot seem to comprehend. Right now, natural gas, or its main component, methane, would be a cheaper and better alternative to petroleum fractions for powering stationary power units and motor vehicles. Solar or wind generated electricity may never be competitive, so long as we have lots of the various and reliable sources of methane.


3 posted on 08/03/2012 4:56:44 PM PDT by alloysteel (Voter suppression is needed now more than ever. Only, whom shall be suppressed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Club of Rome = Evil

UN = Evil

UN Agenda 21 = Despicable

One worlders = Sinister


7 posted on 08/03/2012 6:05:25 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Save American Medicine and Save Your Own Life

Missing the Point About Aurora

Too Many Guns in the U.S. -- or Too ?

Donley: New Bunker-Busting Bomb Ready To Use

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

9 posted on 08/03/2012 6:57:39 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Lomborg deserves quite a bit of credit for being honest. He’s made a big dent in the Green front.


13 posted on 08/03/2012 7:34:12 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Their conclusion was that before 2012, the world would run out of aluminum, copper,gold, lead, mercury, molybdenum, natural gas, oil, silver, tin, tungsten, and zinc —12of the 19 substances they looked at. They were simply and spectacularly wrong.

Liberal elites never apologize either - they just come up with a new horror when the old ones quit working...

Wonder what's after global warming...

14 posted on 08/03/2012 8:06:18 PM PDT by GOPJ (Political correctness is simply George Orwell's Newspeak by a non-threatening name. FR- Bernard Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The world’s supply of resources is getting bigger, not smaller
16 posted on 08/03/2012 8:39:07 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson