Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2012 9:44:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Kaslin

Nope


2 posted on 08/04/2012 9:48:49 AM PDT by al baby (“If Barack Obama has a Harvard law degree, he didn’t earn that. Somebody else made that happen.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nope.

The EPA,
ENVIRONUTS,
US SENATE,
DemoRats,
ACLU,
Unions, would get in the way


3 posted on 08/04/2012 9:50:41 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Truman. Because he nuked our enemies.

/johnny

4 posted on 08/04/2012 9:50:41 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Of course not.

But as the country spirals down in the muslim prehistory, you may see it erased.


7 posted on 08/04/2012 9:53:58 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama Kills))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m not sure there area any men or women very deserving of it nowadays. Reagan, maybe, but the country would NEVER agree on it.

We are definitely, and sadly, far too divided now to achieve or build anything of such iconic greatness.

Perhaps one day this country will regain its spirtual footing, — but I feel we’re going to have to hit rock bottom before it happens — or kick out some of these rabble rousers that hate America and its way of life.

I feel, most of all, this country has become on that loves pleasure and money more than God and doing His will. It’s all about power and money, power and money.

Just some rambling thoughts.


8 posted on 08/04/2012 9:54:14 AM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There is no way in hell that Mt. Rushmore would get built in this era.

First, liberals wouldn’t support it for environmental issues.

Secondly, liberals despise America.

Thirdly, if liberals were going to celebrate any Americans like that, it would be Malcolm X, Susan B Oprah Winfrey, Caesar Chavez, and Barack Hussein Obama.


9 posted on 08/04/2012 9:56:10 AM PDT by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Here are 48 things that Barack Obama has done which should make his supporters feel ashamed and embarrassed
10 posted on 08/04/2012 9:57:43 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sure America could.

As long as it was only one head - and that one Obama’s.

/s


11 posted on 08/04/2012 9:58:58 AM PDT by PeteB570 ( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I still believe that Americans can do anything a put their minds to in the world. The only trouble is the have to carry 10 liberals hanging on their at every turn. I makes it harder to do.


12 posted on 08/04/2012 9:59:39 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The is what the current regime would authorize (by executive order):


14 posted on 08/04/2012 10:15:29 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (obozo could bring back literal slavery with chains and still he will get 85+% of the black vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I wish they would finally open the other side to the public.
16 posted on 08/04/2012 10:20:08 AM PDT by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No. For all the reasons mentioned.

America just isn’t the country it used to be, sadly.


18 posted on 08/04/2012 10:24:13 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It would not be politically possible.Marx and Lenin, possibly but the enviros might even scotch that.


19 posted on 08/04/2012 10:24:28 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We could, but would not.

It is like the polticians credo of “there are no easy answers or solutions’, which is a lie. There are simple answers and solutions to most all problems, but the problem is they are hard, so will never be heeded nor implemented.


20 posted on 08/04/2012 10:25:28 AM PDT by Sea Parrot (Once I was young, now I am old and the in between went way too fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The only logical choice would be to put ‘RUSH!’ on it.

Money wouldn't be a problem as it could be self funded.

Next question?

21 posted on 08/04/2012 10:25:32 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The problem is that if you built it today, it would be so PC, only liberal icons need apply.


22 posted on 08/04/2012 10:26:35 AM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

23 posted on 08/04/2012 10:27:42 AM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

As long as the faces were of Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin.


24 posted on 08/04/2012 10:41:43 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the collectivists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Lakotas want the Black Hills back. They’d oppose the Rushmore project because they see it as *their* land. And to be fair, the US gov’t broke the 1868 treaty which so declared it. The Supreme court a couple of decades ago, agreed with the Lakotas and ordered the US gov’t to pay a fortune for the land but the Lakotas won’t touch the money: they want their sacred Black Hills back.

It’s getting easier and easier to sympathize with the Lakotas. After all, the Constitution is the “treaty” that we the people have, with the federal government. And the feds have broken that treaty too, and are now making preparations to destroy us.

We’re all Indians now.


25 posted on 08/04/2012 10:45:05 AM PDT by Rytwyng (I'm still fond of the United States. I just can't find it. -- Fred Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Lakotas want the Black Hills back. They’d oppose the Rushmore project because they see it as *their* land. And to be fair, the US gov’t broke the 1868 treaty which so declared it. The Supreme court a couple of decades ago, agreed with the Lakotas and ordered the US gov’t to pay a fortune for the land but the Lakotas won’t touch the money: they want their sacred Black Hills back.

It’s getting easier and easier to sympathize with the Lakotas. After all, the Constitution is the “treaty” that we the people have, with the federal government. And the feds have broken that treaty too, and are now making preparations to destroy us.

We’re all Indians now.


26 posted on 08/04/2012 10:45:24 AM PDT by Rytwyng (I'm still fond of the United States. I just can't find it. -- Fred Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson