Posted on 08/09/2012 6:23:16 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Any single woman who cannot get her boyfriend to kick in and help pay for birth control, is a fool and must be desperately afraid he will run out on her if asked to provide contraceptives.
Women who want to fulfill their sexual appetites and who expect taxpayers to take responsibility to prevent their pregnancies are simply self-centered, selfish, and undisciplined. Learning to take care of your own contraceptive needs - or abstaining from a lifestyle of being cavalier about sex shows maturity and wisdom. So many of today's women show none of that. They shout about being "independent," yet they run to Daddy Government to give them everything, including, now, money so they can have sex and avoid pregnancy. They support a man who increases their cost of living and taxes, and then pretends to care for their concerns by handing them a meesly $9.00 per month for birth control. It is idiotic that they don't see how lop-sided that "gift" is, and how they are being played for fools.
Not only are they hypocritical...they are making themselves the most dependent generation of women ever.
According to “NBC Latino” we white people need to shut up or we are going to be put in detention camps.
I believe they were his third highest percentage voting block, after blacks and liberal Jews.
“Women, white people: Is that what campaign 2012 is coming down to?”
Yes, that’s probably “what it’s coming down to”.
So what?
Back around ‘08, I predicted that if Obama was elected, his regime and governance would tip towards “racis’” by nature, and that it would become a factor in his re-election campaign. Any opposition to him would ultimately be attributable to “racism”.
The truth — like it or not, and many don’t like it because it offends their idealism and sensibilities — is that there are indeed undercurrents of “race” in the election. Columnists and talking heads do their best to dance around this reality, but it’s there. And for good reason....
I believe the course of the next three months is going to be predictable. It will go like this:
- Romney’s campaign will make some kind of assertion or claim towards Obama or his administration or policies
- Obama’s campaign (or his minions in the media) will reply with “racism!”
- Romney’s campaign will immediately issue a “clarification”, perhaps even an apology, or simply drop the subject.
- Who win’s the parry?
Nothing unusual here. In fact, it’s been de riguer for “race relations” in America for the last fifty years. If you want to shut up a white talking frankly about race, just cry “racis’”, and you will get one of two results:
1. The white will immediately shut up (and, by doing so, concede), or...
2. The white will try to refute the claim with “I’m not a racist....” (and having claimed that, will back away and try to come up with some -other- argument to prove he/she isn’t a racist).
Either way, who has won?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Told you that to tell you this: perhaps Eric Holder was right, and perhaps it’s time for folks to stop being “a nation of cowards” insofar as frank talk on race is concerned.
But I don’t expect to see this from the Romney campaign.
On such matters, I predict they will be rolled — and rolled again.
Here’s some good news - things aren’t that bleak, sick:
Didnt Dems inadvertantly decide to demonize GE because they (Dems) wanted an example of a corp appearing to makes lots of money while paying zero taxes to demonize and beat up in public, and GE turned up the most convenient to use?
The Dems kept saying how unfair it was.
Thanks sickoflibs.
You hit the nail on the head. But it's hardly surprising that you would see racism exhibited in such a "crafty" way by a Los Angeles Slimes writer.
BTW, the article is accompanied by a photo of Obama campaigning and embracing Sandra Fluke, the outspoken proponent of contraception provided on the government dime. It's obvious now that Fluke has been stage-managed by the Obama White House ever since her first notorious appearance at that congressional committee hearing. Obama's running around the country with Fluke will lose him more votes than he will gain.
I’ve seen several dozen 2012 stickers.
I want to move wherever you are.
I saw a letter to Dear Abby years ago (would have to be! How long has it been?) in which the girl said she thought her boyfriend should chip in for the birth control, but she didn't feel she knew him well enough to ask him!
I would really like to see Republicans take a different approach to welfare reform, to go on the attack with ads pointing out that the Dems seem hell-bent on turning perfectly good poor people (yes, there are some -- maybe not as many as there used to be) into a permanent underclass, of a type hitherto unknown in America. A mass of people without hope, without education (teachers' unions anyone?), without high aspirations, a people whose physical needs are met (and assure plenty of free abortion to keep their numbers down) -- treated in fact as someone "compassionate" (but who doesn't want to be much bothered) might treat stray animals.
I heard one talk radio host say that there were many successes under welfare-to-work. Maybe they could track down some of the success stories and use those people in their ads, describing what they came from and what they've achieved.
Just a thought . . .
Actually, it was never a "congressional hearing." It was a press conference staged by the dems - Notice there wasn't a single republican there. They claimed it was a congressional hearing, but Fluke was denied being a "witness," due to the fact that she had no expertise in what the real congressional committee hearing was about.
Mark
Yes, it’s true——Obama is narrowing his appeal to certain voter identity groups.
The DNC will announce ad campaigns targeted to:
<><> women who took a Dale Carnegie course
<><> women who have had Brazilian butt lifts
<><> women who are on Lipozene
To keep the femi-nazis off his back, ads will also target:
<><> men with low-Testerone
<><> men with erectile dysfunction
<><> men who shot a hole-in-one (on the golf course)
That's another choice quote from the posted LA Slimes story, and most likely a falsehood as well. It would be hard to believe that Obama and Fluke hadn't met during the time frame of her congressional committee appearance.
Judging from the pose in that photo posted at # 29 by null and void, Obama might be thinking of Fluke as a potential VP running mate. (LOL!) (Yes, Fluke is constitutionally ineligible for the vice presidency, being under age 35, but so is Obama in all likelihood because of the NBC clause.)
She could run, she only needs a fake BC saying she’ll be 35 by 1/20/2013...
OMG - isn’t that a pitiful revelation of the morality level of some women? I guess she knew him well enough to risk the possibility of sharing a disease, and paying for that to boot!
Come to Texas sweetheart, we would love to have you here! :)
Not near as much as I would love to be there!
I have applied for scores of semiconductor jobs at dozens of Texas companies.
Keep trying! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.