Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPo Prints 700-Word Article Attacking Paul Ryan's Suit
NewsBusters.org ^ | August 15, 2012 | Matthew Sheffield

Posted on 08/15/2012 2:30:24 PM PDT by Kaslin

Self-absorbed New York Times columnist David Brooks is famous for his insipid belief that Barack Obama's pant crease meant that he'd be "a very good president," now it looks as though the Washington Post has decided to join him in sartorial absurdity by dispatching reporter Katherine Boyle to write a 700-word piece pondering the meaning of Paul Ryan's suit size.

Is this the beginning of a desperate attempt to Palinize the new GOP vice presidential nominee? It's too soon to tell but whatever the case, it is truly amazing to see Boyle ponder the larger significance of the suit that Ryan wore when GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney introduced him to voters last Saturday.

Boyle clearly spent a lot of time on this, interviewing several different people on the very important question of "How could a fitness buff with 6 to 8 percent body fat wear a suit that looked two sizes too big?"

But Ryan (Wis.) appeared rumpled, slightly sloppy for a vice-presidential candidate. As if he’d flown in hours before and mistakenly picked up someone else’s suitcase. His pants sagged at his ankles. His starched, white shirt bunched at his stomach. His dark jacket drooped, better suited for a man of the cloth than a man on a presidential ticket.

Ryan, a high-ranking House Republican, known as a stickler for numbers and a devotee of hard-core workouts, seemed oddly unconcerned about the clothes he wore during the most important announcement of his political career. How could a fitness buff with 6 to 8 percent body fat wear a suit that looked two sizes too big?

“Paul Ryan looked like what he is: a rumpled, think-tank policy wonk sort of guy,” said Christine K. Jahnke, president of Positive Communications, a Washington-based media and image-consultant company (her hundreds of clients have included The Washington Post). “I don’t think that will change as the campaign goes on. If he clicks it up too much, both he and Romney will have the distant CEO-Wall Street look.”

Perhaps his raw, slightly unkempt suit balances out Romney’s snazzier, controlled appearance. Ryan’s Midwestern sensibilities and baggy pants may appeal to swing voters who think cuff links are wasteful expenditures. The man believes in trimming budgets, not pant legs.

There's even more to Boyle's critical investigation, including an obligatory Palin mention:

In Ryan’s case, styling himself as a baggy-suited newcomer aligned with the party’s conservatives may be a wise strategy for the campaign. And it may steer Ryan away from the disaster that accompanied Sarah Palin’s 2008 wardrobe scandal, when financial disclosure records revealed that the Republican National Committee spent more than $150,000 on her clothing — which occurred after Lisa A. Kline was hired to handle Palin’s campaign makeover.

Perhaps that's true. Or maybe a suit is just a suit.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: idiots; lies; mainstreammedia; washingtoncompost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 08/15/2012 2:30:32 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well when they know they can't run on Obama/Biden’s record or ideas, all the Democrat propaganda bots are left with is these sorts of childish attempts at diversion.
2 posted on 08/15/2012 2:35:19 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was...


3 posted on 08/15/2012 2:37:13 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I smile when I read idiotic drivel such as this from left-wingers because, not only is the subject about as trivial as you can get but it clearly demonstrates the complete lack of substance in the Obama campaign. Paul Ryan is a fit 42-year old, articulate and energetic, and his suit is an issue? Considering that David Brooks opined that Obama would make a good president because he had a sharp crease in his pants, I'm not surprised.
4 posted on 08/15/2012 2:38:10 PM PDT by Jim Scott (Obama must be defeated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I remember seeing Al Gore on TV once when he was Vice President (maybe the time he had a “debate” with Perot) wearing a shirt with creases in it that made it obvious it had just been taken out of the package. I doubt anyone wrote a 700-word article about it.


5 posted on 08/15/2012 2:45:19 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SparkyBass

Poor Choice! It’s Elvis’s DEATH WEEK.


6 posted on 08/15/2012 2:50:55 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will j rest in the shadow of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
An attempt at politics of personal destruction so absurd that it becomes a joke in no time flat....
7 posted on 08/15/2012 2:55:00 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Barry is an empty suit, something that is more evident every day.

Why no media coverage on that fact?

The absolute silence on that topic is like the synapses in

Slow-Joe’s poor head.


8 posted on 08/15/2012 2:56:59 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (On November 6, 2012 "I Built It'...Obama's defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess she did not see the shirt 0bama had on in IA yesterday or Monday. It had to be 2 sizes too big. I think he borrowed it from a staffer to try to look more “casual”.


9 posted on 08/15/2012 2:58:26 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I think if anyone had approached George Washington about his attire....he would have started laughing and probably had a good long ten-minute laugh before stopping and just asking if attire had any advantages on the battlefield or in debate of democracy.


10 posted on 08/15/2012 3:07:04 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is one article that make me glad we can only excerpt WACompost articles.


11 posted on 08/15/2012 3:12:49 PM PDT by CedarDave (Palin/Ryan -- both should have been at the top of the ticket and not play second fiddle to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
i'll bet they're patting themselves on the back for that one...
12 posted on 08/15/2012 3:15:22 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF
It had to be 2 sizes too big.

_____________________________

Did that shirt look to fit someone like Reggie Love? (on the left). Obama must miss that big fella something fierce


13 posted on 08/15/2012 3:22:09 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Some times 0bama dresses casual too. What's the big deal?

Family Portrait

14 posted on 08/15/2012 3:38:14 PM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
David Brooks... isn't he the heterophobe who had an orgasm over the crease in Ubama's pants?
15 posted on 08/15/2012 4:03:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Two half wits posing, pretending they actually know what they are looking at. Book? Ipad? Their crotches?

Flush! Get rid of the Kenyan and Mochie Nov6th

16 posted on 08/15/2012 4:06:13 PM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

SHORT SOX???? What man wears SHORT SOX with a SUIT!!! What a LOSER!!!! Really, knee high black sox are the ONLY suitable sox for men in dark suits.


17 posted on 08/15/2012 4:09:30 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Say what you will, but that suit was too big though not 700 words too big.


18 posted on 08/15/2012 4:34:08 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You don’t have to be gay to write 700 words about a VP candidate’s suit....but it helps....


19 posted on 08/15/2012 5:33:41 PM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess if the press can’t find real stories like bullets being distributed to Social Security offices around the country - and dry runs practicing shooting seniors who can’t get their checks ( a dry run was done in Florida) then they might as well write about Ryan not being as obsessed as a gay guy would be with ‘his look’...

Journalists are sooooooo shallow ... so creepy...


20 posted on 08/15/2012 5:45:18 PM PDT by GOPJ (Freeper Neveronmywatch's convinced: Put a compass in the hands of a liberal it'll point south.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson