1. Hillary is, and always was a liar. In fact, she is a perennial, perpetual, and obligate liar (Sir Edmund Hillary is Hillary Rodhams namesake, Hillary R. was under sniper fire in Bosnia. Hillary read nonexistent Wall Street Journal articles on how to succeed in the futures market, she didn't know about the FALN pardons. Hillary Rodham was caught red-handed stealing White House china and art and lied that it was an error; she even claimed to be a Yankees fan, and many, many, other conscience-less uber-whoppers.) And so it is, in March of 2011 when Hillary says that in she will retire from politics in 2012. I was instantly suspicious, as there is no reason to serve notice that far in advance unless one was intending to deceive. I also suspected that she was lying (of course) and she had weaseled her way into running for VEEP on Obamas ticket in 2012.
2. Thus, by my guess, it was back in 2011 that, President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Hillary Rodham (Clinton), agreed to have Hillary be the VEEP candidate in 2012. This is important.
3. This means that Biden would need to bow out. Now, since Democrats are NEVER, EVER honest about anything, I expect Biden to FAKE a health condition (for example dementia or early stages of senility, or most anything), and just go along. Importantly, this performance needs to be newsy so everyone starts clamoring for a replacement. Proof? Well, IIRC, when Biden made his chains statement this week, there was a teleprompter right there.
4. Then, since the Dems just love PUBLICITY STUNTS, I expect a fake pubic plea from Obama to Hillary to be the VEEP, while...
5. Hillary FAKES playing hard-to-get, saying (lying, of course) that she's "retiring" and doesn't want it. Mind you, I suspect that this is the script since 2011.
6. So, just in time for the Dem convention, you might see (planted) "news" stories about allegedly worried Dems faking pleas to Hillary..."Please Hillary, please, please accept the VEEP nomination, Hillary, the nation needs you", and other such pre-written lines for nauseating performances of B-grade fiction.
7. The news and entertainment media will, I suspect, have their instructions. This will be a mandatory media fenzy (they have already ceded that First Amendment thingy to Obama, anyway), and the "news" media will make this a 24/7 national worry. How can we convince Hillary to accept?
8. Summarizing, I suspect that the replacement of Biden by Hillary is likely and is a setup that has been in the works for over a year; and since the Dems simply have to lie about everything, they will FAKE the reasons and FAKE the drama.
8. Todays date is 8/16/12, and I have been cautiously predicting this (right here on FR) for about a year. That said, I would love to be wrong about any or all of this.
.
I’m only 26, so feel free to scold me, but has this ever happened before?
Fake pubic plea?
"Because having a race card in the White House isn't enough"
And so Biden is a bit ticked and has gone overboard with this remarks in retaliation? Then he gets sent home.
You better be wrong or else we’re screwn. But there’s a 70/30 chance you’re right.
But we can counter this. The mushy indies won’t feel secure about this switching horses in midstream.
I don’t think there is any way Cankles would be 2nd to Pres. Obama - unless she knew he had a rapid, fatal disease.
what a mess the o'dumbo has on his hands!
Barry could have had Hillary! but his remissness Palin pulled the rug out from under him by suggesting it first.
Oh what can a Kenyan Marxist from Chicago do?
I can't wait to find out
But still, a shake up in the ticket is a tacit admission that the Obama regime is in serious disarray. It isn’t a sign of stability, and that’s the case he has to make. That he is doing well, and we shouldn’t change horses.
Excellent analysis but Hillary could still back out. She would face the prospect of being shackled to a White House whose policies will create ever-worsening economic, national security and social conditions with civil insurrections and anarchy.
Taking into account the facts surrounding the Bisexual Kenyan, and She Who Must Not Be Named, your chain of events is quite plausible.
Klein: White House Woos Hillary
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/314270/klein-white-house-woos-hillary-robert-costa
We shall see, I guess.
My take...
She hates Obama.
She wants to run in 2016.
If she were on the ticket this time and win, she would have to defend everything Obama did in 2016.
If she were on the ticket with Obama and lose, she will be blamed and be out of the running altogether in 2016.
I have a feeling she’s going to spend the next three months doing her Secretary of State job somewhere else in the world.
Hillary has too much to lose and not enough to gain by being VP.( If she wants to run in 4 years the slot is hers....she does not need the VP position to gain stature) She and Bill are also looking at the internal polls
‘I expect a fake pubic plea from Obama to Hillary to be the VEEP, while...”
Dear God, even Gynecologists in training want nothing to do with THAT PUBIC AREA.
‘I expect a fake pubic plea from Obama to Hillary to be the VEEP, while...”
Dear God, even Gynecologists in training want nothing to do with THAT PUBIC AREA.
There was a reason he didn’t pick her in 2008, he doesn’t need her scandals on top on his. Her current “popularity” is built on a sandcastle cause she’s currently in a “non-partisan” role.
He would be smart to dump Biden though, he is a liability.
Always a sleight-of-hand; and by word, with these people; and so yes; no reason to trust ANY thing they do or say. When they protest too much; greatest observance is required.
Hillary; of course; after advancing Obama for 'four'; (if not more) years; would have to be watching her back as well. We know there is no safe place in a den of thieves; or worse; den of Marxist/communist et al, radicals; and no one knows better; than the debased and ruthless ideologists, themselves; what they are capable of.
Has Hillary been tapped to carry the Lefts torch? Or are MOs falling into place, whereby; the man who would be king may become just that.
Whatever; reasonable (?) to imagine/assume; that the Collective has no intention of going gently; by vote. (sounds of tin foil crinkling?)
The fact 'news' people covered a gaffe by a democrat WAS news in itself. Then the realization - someone on the left WANTED them to freak and cover Biden's comment. The press wasn't going balanced and fair, they were still taking down notes from their handlers. Just different handlers. They know who... and they're not telling. So much for 'the news'...
You're right democrats being liars. Remember them laughing about how happy they were Romney picked Ryan? Turns out that was a lie too. Of course the MSM pushed it out - probably knowing the whole time is was another dem trick... lie.. falsehood... whatever.