Posted on 08/21/2012 12:34:55 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
My my...what a lively thread this one is....:)
As you know, Remembering a Sixties Terrorist By: Donna Ron illustrates in a stark way not suitable for Free Republic what a debased, soulless creature is Bill Ayers, author of Dreams.That it is his invention to put DBA OBAMA's head on somebody else next to Genevieve Cook is too precious.
You just haven’t bothered to watch the video I posted the link to from Gilbert’s film in which he shows The Model in numerous poses in numerous locations wearing different clothes - and all the way through she’s the same girl, she had a long career and of course she doesn’t always look the same, she started to wear more make-up and gained weight. Gilbert obtained the images from a website and from magazines, the photographs were taken over a period of time.
Tell me, do your own photographs show you looking the same when you were a teen and when you were in your early twenties? If they don’t, then neither does The Model. If two girls with a superficial resemblance are so essential to attempting to identify an old black man and a white teenager as parents of zero, how desperate are they?
Did you read through the thread or just jump on the side-by side-image of the Model and Stanley Ann Dunham and throw in your two cents...because that’s really all your analysis is worth. You’ve managed to make three women out of two.
I’ll read that when I don’t need to eat or digest immediately, I am sure it will be nauseating in the extreme.
People often don’t want to see the ugly truth. Well, I have this to say to such people:
If you don’t let Reality in when it knocks politely, sooner or later Reality will kick your door in.
The differences in appearance between the model and SAD have been taken apart in great detail on other threads. I don’t know if you’ve taken the time to read and look at those threads. What bothers me is your accusation of dishonesty. That reeks. If you think the comparison isn’t valid, than come up with something better.
If you had looked at other threads with more photos for comparison, you would have seen that there are several facial structures and proportions that are notably different in the two people.
Your coming onto the thread to make a very nasty accusation of dishonesty makes me really wonder about your motivation.
It looked like a section produced on a production line, there were numerous different women and girls all presented in the same fashion, some were in groups, many on their own, the locations and backgrounds were various.
The girl originally identified as Stanley Ann Dunham, who did superficially resemble her, was a model who appears again and again throughout the numerous magazines Gilbert has collected. Images that he presents, not as Stanley Ann Dunham in the video, but as ANN DUNHAM.
So what is his accusation? Is it that ANN DUNHAM had a relationship with the elderly Frank Marshall Davis in Hawaii? If so, and even if he makes it clear that his theory is Ann Dunham was the mother of zero, who can hold his feet to the fire over it? All he is really insinuating is that ANN OBAMA and Stanley Ann Dunham were the same person.
HE HASN'T SAID THAT STANLEY ANN DUNHAM HAD A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.
In reality, he's no different to Neil Abercrombie, who knows very well that he never saw Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii with the kenyan.
That's why Neil Abercrombie always calls the woman he saw with the kenyan ANN. That's a safe bet for Neil, just as it is for Gilbert. They both know there was an entry in the Honolulu Polk for ANN S OBAMA. A resident student. That this person wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham apparently has yet to sink in.
And until that happens, all the discussions about who the model is, are a waste of time I guess. Stanley Ann Dunham wasn't in Hawaii. But ANN OBAMA was.
And ALL of the exotic images from the free vintage porn website and the magazines featured in the Gilbert video, (link provided twice) ARE NEITHER ANN NOR STANLEY ANN.
The “birther” threads were infested with leftist lackey hirelings with the odd smattering of bile spewing misanthropes specifically to drive away rational people.
They’d done a good job.
But - FR is not the wide world, it is a small subset of a subset.
If the information were to get out there, it would be a different story indeed.
I think you could make your theory work simply by cutting the bottom off Stanley Ann Dunhams chin.
Not a problem, just do what the three ugly sisters did in the original Cinderella (Aschenputl) before it was santized by Disney; to try and get their feet to fit into the glass slipper, they cut their toes off.
Let Stanley Ann cut her chin off if it doesn’t fit the Model template. And fix that weird nose she had at the same time...lol...
Why won’t anyone look at the video on the Gilbert site I linked to, there’s nothing there to be afraid of, all the titties and bums have been covered up, you’ll see more on the beach than what’s showing in those silly photographs.
It's true, you see. The book I had showed them cutting their toes off and there was blood all over the floor. Gruesome.
When the wedding with the prince was to be held, the two false sisters came, wanting to gain favor with Cinderella and to share her good fortune. When the bridal couple walked into the church, the older sister walked on their right side and the younger on their left side, and the pigeons pecked out one eye from each of them. Afterwards, as they came out of the church, the older one was on the left side, and the younger one on the right side, and then the pigeons pecked out the other eye from each of them. And thus, for their wickedness and falsehood, they were punished with blindness as long as they lived.
http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm021.html
Joel Gilbert's thesis--whether serious or mocking--requires the model from the vintage porn photos be identical to Stanley Ann Dunham.In the photo comparison, the model's chin is not as long as Stanley Ann Dunham's overlong chin.
Because they are two different women.
In a comparison of their noses, the model's is relatively symmetrical; Stanley Ann Dunham's is not symmetrical.
Because the model is not Stanley Ann Dunham.
Other dissimilarities are apparent: for one, the ears are different: the model's ears are close to the head; Stanley Ann Dunham has her father's elephant ears.
Joel Gilbert completes his trilogy with another mockumentary.
Elvis is not alive.
Paul is not dead.
Frank Marshall Davis is not DBA OBAMA's father, nor is a vintage porn model his mother.
Neither is Stanley Ann Dunham his mother; nor is Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. his father.
I read the whole letter, and he was saying he had a son Mark who was entering training as an intelligence officer in the US Air Force?
Whew.
How could Mark get security clearance with a communist ex pat pedophile for a father?
I still guess that Obama is the son of Stanley Dunham and an unknown black mother, and that SAD was one way or another forced by SAD and various “friends” to register the birth of Obama as her own child, by bringing Obama into Hawaii as her own when in fact he was not, then applying for a registration of Birth which had occurred abroad to another woman as her own.
SD was the dad IMHO.Obama is not black enough to be the direct son of Obama Sr with SAD as Mom..
Is there any record of a black woman who was in SD’s life, he hung with FMD , likely at the Elks Club as well as other places?
I grew up reading old versions of European fairy tales. Good moral stories, well worth reading today. Too bad the versions now are all santizied and PC I imagine. I read my parent’s books they had when they were children. Many quite gruesome.
Have you read the entire “Auntie” thread? It is a real revelation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2702976/posts
It proves that there are two children; one dark one the sone of the Kenyan and a woman named Ann, and another child born elsewhere given to SAD the nanny. The Dunhams have nothing to do with his conception. Please read it if you are interested in learning more, that thread really helped clear it up for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.