Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio doctor helps perpetuate rape pregnancy ideas
Sacramento Bee ^ | August 24, 2012 | JULIE CARR SMYTH

Posted on 08/25/2012 3:23:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The discredited notion that a woman's body can resist conception in a sexual assault has persisted in anti-abortion circles for decades, largely because of the efforts of a Cincinnati obstetrician who is considered a godfather of the movement.

Dr. John C. "Jack" Willke founded the National Right to Life Committee and wrote the influential 1971 "Handbook on Abortion," which has shaped the thinking of generations of anti-abortion activists.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012electionbias; abortion; atkin; drjohncwillke; jackwillke; pravdamedia; rape; raperape; romneyryan2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2012 3:24:11 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The bigger problem with a rape exception is that it is falsely reported more often than not and that rape now includes anything including the woman waking up and deciding “I didn’t really want to do this” after the fact.

Glenn Beck quoted a study where “rape” resulted in 2x the number of pregnancies but I think that study included self reported “rape” which includes scared girls making an excuse for an existing pregnancy..

FWIW I’m not a medical doctor but based on other mammals in stressful situations (zoos?) I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if it wasn’t proven at some later time that high stress does greatly reduce fertility.


2 posted on 08/25/2012 4:02:46 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Neidermeyer
It is already a fact that stress lowers fertility.

Why would anti-abortionists would make an issue out of the low incidence of pregnancy due to rape, it is irrelevant to the question of abortion.

4 posted on 08/25/2012 4:13:16 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Simple cognitive dissonance or outright propagandizing?

From the article:

The discredited notion that a woman's body can resist conception in a sexual assault has persisted in anti-abortion circles for decades, largely because of the efforts of a Cincinnati obstetrician who is considered a godfather of the movement.”

Dr. John C. “Jack” Willke founded the National Right to Life Committee and wrote the influential 1971 “Handbook on Abortion,” which has shaped the thinking of generations of anti-abortion activists.”
...
Anti-abortion activist Janet Folger Porter has Willke’s handbook in her reference library. She said it's popular worldwide because it isn't filled with emotional arguments and religious dogma, but hard facts.

It's spelled out in Q-and-A form,” she said. “The whole thing is not Dr. Willke’s opinion or dissertation on the issue. It's independent studies, all of them cited, by issue.”

===

Akin is a moral man who, as none of us are, is not perfect. Anyone who claims that anyone of our government is better qualified to represent us with integrity is either on the wrong side or evaluating with the wrong criteria.

The left, including the gop-e and those fearful of being judged based on political correctness are reacting as if embroiled in lynch-mob mentality. They're failing to use their minds to review the truth and context... or they have their own "means to an end".

Shame.

5 posted on 08/25/2012 4:18:48 AM PDT by plsjr (<>< ... HIS will be done! (choose a "lesser evil"? NEVER AGAIN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The authors asserted that a douche, vaginal scraping and medications administered quickly after a rape "invariably" prevents pregnancy.

I wonder what medications he was referring to, and whether some people would have a problem with their use. Of course this was in 1971.

Maybe it's a sign of the financial status of the Sacramento Bee that they're asking website readers to "Live chat with intuitive and gifted psychics".

6 posted on 08/25/2012 4:23:12 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
The bigger problem with a rape exception is that it is falsely reported more often than not and that rape now includes anything including the woman waking up and deciding “I didn’t really want to do this” after the fact.
Yes! True! The following comes from a man who agrees with you. Whole post is a good read, btw:
But in addition, there are two practical political reasons why not to allow these exceptions:

First, if only a rape or incest claim will get someone an abortion, then lots of people who didn’t get pregnant that way will claim that they did, to qualify for the loophole. The desire of some to get a legal abortion will lead them to tie up the criminal justice system with nonexistent accusations borne of fear and desperation if not malice, and the abortions will occur anyway, just at greater cost.

Second, if we allow these exceptions, we are violating one of the great tenets of jurisprudence: Hard cases make bad law. If something is an extreme rarity, then it should not drive our policy. It’s an imperfect world; if you insist on perfection, you’ll fall farther from the mark than if you had accepted the reasonable. And we know that pregnancies resulting from rape or incest are an incredibly small minority of pregnancies. Except as a political football, the question of allowing abortion as a consequence of rape is simply too small a statistic – a sad, even tragic statistic, yes, but still too small a statistic – to justifiably drive the conversation. --John F. Di Leo

7 posted on 08/25/2012 4:24:53 AM PDT by mlizzy (And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill? --MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
>"“has no control over ovulation, fertilization or implantation of a fertilized egg."

Nor adrenal production, nor any other stress induced physical reactions.


It is an empirically non provable statement either way.

8 posted on 08/25/2012 4:30:09 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends


THE DAMN LEFT IS ALWAYS TO YIELD TO THE RIGHT!

Less then $2.2k to GO to GREEN!

9 posted on 08/25/2012 4:40:20 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

How about the fact rape is an under reported crime? You say falsely but the other side of the equation is the stigma and embarrassment attached to it. Many rapes are never reported.


10 posted on 08/25/2012 4:41:43 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I work with aguy that believes rape victims that get pregnant, subconciously wanted and enjoyed it!!


11 posted on 08/25/2012 4:45:36 AM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

American indians used to use a concoction made from mayapple root to cause abortion and to deal with skin cancers and genital warts. It works but is not without risk to the user. Too much, the user dies along with the fetus; too little and the user get a child but with birth defects; and it can cause halucinations, stupor, etc. Early settlers used it as well, and it is still collected today for the pharmaceutical industry for skin cancer treatments.


12 posted on 08/25/2012 4:52:14 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
I wonder what medications he was referring to, and whether some people would have a problem with their use. Of course this was in 1971.
I would think some would have an issue with the "medications" he suggests (possibly they are herbs or essential oils or stronger; we are distributors of Young Living's oils, and they have cautions on a few of them that they are not to be taken by a pregnant woman as they can induce labor), and the only "vaginal scraping" I know of is a D&C, which IS an abortion, or the removal of contents from a miscarriage. Link
13 posted on 08/25/2012 5:03:47 AM PDT by mlizzy (And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill? --MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Another Quack thesis.


14 posted on 08/25/2012 5:36:41 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (I didn't post this. Someone else did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave; P-Marlowe; SoConPubbie; cripplecreek

This is exactly why Akin said what he said, and he should not be pilloried for his comments the brutal way that he has been.

So far as the word “legitimate”, it has 5 meanings which are recorded in Webster, and one of them is “actual”. That is the one he meant. He was distinguishing violent rape with statutory rape, false reports of rape (didn’t happen), and false reports of rape that were actually consentual but reinterpreted, for example, to prevent parental anger.

The Duke LaCrosse case is one example of the above that he was trying to distinguish.

In many ways, the word legitimate was a weak word choice, but in other ways it was fine, IF you were tracking with him and understood what he was thinking.


15 posted on 08/25/2012 5:47:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
FWIW I’m not a medical doctor but based on other mammals in stressful situations (zoos?) I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if it wasn’t proven at some later time that high stress does greatly reduce fertility.

It is standard medical practice for physicians to strongly advise women who are trying to conceive to avoid high levels of stress. It is well documented that traumatic events can trigger miscarriages. So the science is there.

16 posted on 08/25/2012 5:54:18 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Yup, right on queue. Akin has delivered the liberal media a narrative they can use against pro-lifers and the larger conservative movement. Nice going guys, gg


17 posted on 08/25/2012 6:04:12 AM PDT by FurryRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Las Vegas Dave; P-Marlowe; SoConPubbie; cripplecreek

Hemingway was a subscriber to the theory that a writer should never use a ten letter word (legitimate) when a five or six letter word (actual) conveys the same meaning.

Akin violated that rule. I didn’t know that the penalty for such a violation was death.


18 posted on 08/25/2012 6:07:47 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Words vs action.

Its real nice that the GOP is waving the pro life banner but the fact is that they’re moving toward a more pro choice stance.

All the attention and fire directed at Akin and virtually no mention of Scott Brown’s announcement of his pro “choice” stance. Its a little hard to swallow that the GOP is pro life when they’ve made such a clear move toward abortion.


19 posted on 08/25/2012 6:08:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; Las Vegas Dave; SoConPubbie; cripplecreek

Have any of you noticed that the loudest, most obnoxious of the supporters of Mitt Romney here on FreeRepublic are also the loudest and most frequent supporters to deep-six Akin?

Have you also noticed the pattern that the loudest and most obnoxious of Mitt Romney supporters are also the most moderate of so called conservatives here on FreeRepublic? Either having no problem at all with Mitt Romney’s support of the Gay Agenda or having no problem with Abortion in some way?

Seems we have an infestation of CINOs going on around here.


20 posted on 08/25/2012 6:24:19 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson