Posted on 08/25/2012 1:17:51 PM PDT by Derp Mountain
The United Nations scoffed on Friday at claims by a judge in Lubbock County, Texas, that U.N. troops could invade the southern U.S. state to settle a possible civil war, which the judge warned could be sparked if Obama is re-elected in November.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Heck, old Nolan Ryan could probably still throw well enough to knock a few blue helmets off their tricycles.
“Methinks people do fall for conspiracy-theory level thinking too much.”
Sometimes, there is a small grain of truth to these “conspiracy theories”.
Ah, the paranoid pseudo logic that fuels conspiracy theories across the globe.
The U.N. couldn’t take Massachusetts.
“The U.N. couldnt take Massachusetts.”
It’s a blue state and choc full of liberals. Massholes would lay out the red carpet for the UN if they had the chance as libs hate America.
“I’m statecraft never believe anything until it has been officially denied.”
—Otto Von Bismarck
Wouldn’t need a full company of Rangers, “One Riot, One Ranger”; “Walker, Texas Ranger” is all that is needed. hee hee hee
I want in on that.
See my tagline.
“Not for more than a few minutes anyway.”
Soda and popcorn time?????
The influx of out-of-state volunteers to throw said invaders back into the Gulf would choke the highways.
After having thrown the invaders back into the Gulf.....I’m pretty sure there would be an interesting new episode of “Shark Week”.
I am neither paranoid nor employing pseudo-logic.
Isn’t Mexico a member of the U.N.? Seems to me the invasion of Texas is well underway.
So this makes sense to you? Loony toon faux judge (it’s an at-law-court, and the judge in question is not an attorney or jurist) say the U.N. is coming, and since the you U.N. denies it, you take that as proof that the judge’s [sic] ravings are legitimate. Had the U.N. claimed it did intend to do so, you would have no doubt accepted that as well. Congratulation, you’re logic contrived to the point where the loony toon judge cannot be wrong. Yep, that’s the very definition of pseudo logic.
So this makes sense to you? Loony toon faux judge (it’s an at-law-court, and the judge in question is not an attorney or jurist) say the U.N. is coming, and since the you U.N. denies it, you take that as proof that the judge’s [sic] ravings are legitimate. Had the U.N. claimed it did intend to do so, you would have no doubt accepted that as well. Congratulation, you’re logic contrived to the point where the loony toon judge cannot be wrong. Yep, that’s the very definition of pseudo logic.
...and a few “Plucking Yew” at the invaders as well.
“We’re from the one-world government and we’re here to help.”
U.N. invade texas?
Hey blue helmuts, good luck with that/
hmmm.. Did Alex Jones talk about this on Coaster to Coaster last night,, I caught just a smidge of something before I dozed off..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.