Oregon Offers to Pay to Kill, but Not to Treat Cancer Patient

LifeSiteNews ^ | 06.04.08 | Tim Waggoner

[ShadowAce]

"We can’t cover everything for everyone," he said.

...and the Libs want single-payer. This should open their eyes, but it won't.

[nascarnation]

The good new is that if we can shave 10 yrs off the life expectancy, SocSec and Medicare financials ARE FIXED !!

[bronxville]

Terrific headline Coleus. It says it all.

[kenavi]

Diogenesis, get some perspective, this question is age-old.

Neither our country nor any other can afford to give the most advanced care to everyone.

The Left's answer is therefore to provide it to no one (but of course the very wealthy or well-connected will find a way).

The Right way is to allow individuals to provide for their own care. What's originally affordable only to the rich, due to market forces becomes more and more affordable to almost everyone.

The society becomes wealthier, and individuals can provide charity for those among the needy whom they consider deserving.

[Diogenesis]

"Neither our country nor any other can afford to give the most advanced care to everyone."

No one ever did it that way.

Enjoy your RomneyDEATH PANEL when it comes to YOUR Family.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

Neither our country nor any other can afford to give the most advanced care to everyone.

No one ever did it that way.

No one ever did which what way? (Nouns are your friends.)

[Surrounded_too]

the kiss of death - (Kenyan and grey eagle photo)

[årskjærø]

yeah, but there is plenty of rationing by for-profit insurance companies and wait-times abound...ever been part of an hmo?

[årskjærø]

i’ve lived in canada, norway and finland and they all do just fine giving health care without breaking their banks to their citizens and to foreigners like me while i was there. check your sources, mon vieux, because they have led you to an epic fail....