Skip to comments.High-Speed Rail Is Definitely Green
Posted on 08/29/2012 11:37:02 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Opponents of high-speed rail contend that it's a boondoggle because of its $68 billion pricetag. But a recent UC Berkeley study provides evidence that a California bullet train might be a good investment, particularly when it comes to reducing greenhouse gases and fighting climate change.
The study, published recently in the journal Environmental Research Letters, was the result of two years of research by UC Berkeley civil and environmental engineering professor Arpad Horvath and Mikhail Chester, professor at Arizona State University's School of Sustainable Engineering and The Built Environment. The study analyzed the environmental sustainability of a high-speed rail network compared to flying and driving. The authors concluded that the high-speed rail system, when it's completed, will consume less energy and emit fewer greenhouse gases and less pollution than autos or planes, even after accounting for future improvements in auto and airplane fuel efficiency and cleaner, greener technology.
"We're not only looking at greenhouse gases, we're also considering things like the potential for smog formation as well as human health respiratory effects," Chester said in an interview. "What we've found is that high-speed rail would be a cleaner mode."
According to the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California, California's population will exceed 50 million people by 2040. ..
In 2008, voters approved $10 billion in bonds to pay for the start-up costs of high-speed rail. Since then, the proposed project has had numerous setbacks that have threatened to derail it. The price tag also has ballooned to at least $68 billion. Republican state Senator Doug LaMalfa, .. "Costs for high-speed rail will continue to rise even as public support plummets," LaMalfa said in a statement. "California doesn't have the money for this project."
(Excerpt) Read more at eastbayexpress.com ...
No one boarded the link going nowhere
but you didn't hear it here. (HSR in California? . it's enuf to make ya spew green.)
only if it’s made of Rearden Metal..........
“...California bullet train might be a good investment, particularly when it comes to reducing greenhouse gases and fighting climate change.”
Sooooo, these writers have demonstrated that they are collossal jewels of monumental ignorance in both science and economics.
Must be liberals.
What utter nonsense. NOTHING is good investment that purports to change the weather. That is out of the realm of human control.
Well that settles it then. Build it. Build it everywhere. Damn the cost.
Damn! Beat me to it.
I got a million ideas just as good as that!
Just ask Willie Green.
I prefer red white and blue.
I just watched Atlas Shrugged Part One last week.
I watched to see if they actually made Rearden Metal green.
I thought 'Choo Choo' Willie was banned!
But, the industries that they skim from to support the railway’s deficits are greenhouse gas producing industries.
But there is a thread nearby:
As Isaac Hits Gulf Coast, Obama Jokes That GOP Believes Jobs 'Will Magically Rain Down'
Republicans say the stupidest things -- especially when you put words in their mouths.
Given that any constructed item requires energy to create (e.g., from iron ore to polished steel), I would imagine that the $68 billion in construction accounts for huge amount of energy use, which I would imagine would overwhelm any modest decrease in greenhouse gases for a train versus car trip.
Maybe they could get like a million sasquatches and they could just carry everybody in California.
Nobody ever gives me a lifecycle cost. I don’t give a damn if it runs emission free if the manufacture and installation is not also emission free. Tell me the whole story and then we can talk.
Maybe you know why a high-roller... ...like George Soros is interested in Rock Ridge.
Don't know. Got to do with where choo-choo go.
Mongo, why would George Soros care about where the choo-choo goes?
Don't know. Mongo only pawn in game of life.
High-Speed Rail Is Definitely Willie Green
well, dang, I would have expected a Professor from the Arizona State University’s School of Sustainable Engineering to come out in support of coal powered SUV’s. /sarc
Just another tainted study by academia to uphold their preconceived outcome. I wonder how much money (above the table and especially under the table)changed hands on this one.
Green is the color of the mold growing on the tracks.
I'm a railfan, but HSR won't work in the US!!
I'd rather spend the HSR money and improve AMTRAK Service...CA Amtrak trains are good!!
It's of no use right now, but once they clear the center of the country of human inhabitants and force them into high-rise containment facilities on both coasts it will connect all the containment facilities very efficiently.
It’s too bad that California didn’t accept the French offer to build HSR on their own dime but the Democrats who lobbied to make sure that HSR crosses their land opposed the idea as they each stand to make millions from the deal.
If government would simply stand aside private firms would build this thing, just as they wanted to do in Texas until Southwest Airlines lobbied to kill it.
That said, there are two arguments against HSR that make whoever use them look retarded and ignorant:
1. “Boondoggle”. Really? Is this the best you got? Then please STFU because you sound like my stodgy old grandfather who thought that everything he didn’t understand was a ‘boondoggle’. Seriously, LIBERALS phrase their arguments with pathetic names when they can’t come up with anything else, be better than that.
2. “The train to nowhere”. Unless you can come up with a way to build the entire system ALL AT ONCE then again, please STFU because you sound like an ignoramus and you make conservatives sound stupid by their association with you.
Unless conservatives can come up with cogent arguments against HSR then just let it go. Argue about the cost, argue that it should be privately built, argue that we can’t afford it, but at least make an intelligent argument, not just run around saying “BOONDOGGLE!!!” like a stupid wind-up-toy.
“But a recent UC Berkeley study provides evidence that...”
...studies that come from berkeley are worthless, politically biased nonsense.
My goodness. How about, 1)We are broke and can't afford it. 2) We don't need it. 3)The people of California don't want it. 4) contrary to your wishful thinking there are no "private firms" ready to cough up 70 or 100 billion to build a train no one cares to ride. If there is I'd sure like to hear about it--so I could short their stock.
If it were a good investment, somebody in the private sector would build it.
>>>contrary to your wishful thinking there are no “private firms” ready to cough up 70 or 100 billion to build a train no one cares to ride. If there is I’d sure like to hear about it—so I could short their stock.<<<
Anmd it looks like a private consortium is again trying to bulid the Texas HSR project despite the previous interference from Southwest Airlines.
“If it were a good investment, somebody in the private sector would build it.”
Just another government waste project whose true cost is unknown. Try $100 Billion Plus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.