Posted on 09/08/2012 3:06:59 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
Ping
How embarrassing for Obozo! And right in the middle of his national obfuscation tour!
And they went for some cover and in the next paragraph stated that some were not tracked.
Are we starting to see the unraveling? We know that none were tracked and now the media is starting to say that some weren't as a statement of journalistic fact? I say this guy will quickly assume room temperature so this story will die, literally.
Another “workplace violence” incident? DHS has yet to declare...
Something is in the wind and the glow is off the rose. Posting on another thread
They arrested HOLDER???? FABULOUS!!
I admit that my second reaction after reading your comment, right after LOL, was to try to find the Like button.
My initial reaction as well!
And not only of the Odinga supporters. How many times did Lenny Davis show up on Faux News, Hannity and Faux Business and not one of these A$$ hats have yet to ask him about the Fast and Furious emails that lead back to him.
This guy should be indicted right along with Holder and others in my opinion.
(My emphasis.)
Can somebody explain the bolded phrase?
Are "probes" during GWB's administration being associated with FnF? Clearly, one would assume from this sentence that President Bush participated in Fast and Furious or an early version of "gun walking."
Someone please clarify for me.
Like Obozo’s Fast and Furious, the Bush Administration had a smaller scale operation called project “Wide Receiver”. Unlike Obummer’s, Bush’s program notified the Mexican government and actually had trackers on the guns, so they knew where they were going. And actual arrests were made, if I’m not mistaken.
The person you are thinking of is Lanny Bruer. Lanny Davis was a Democratic operative and aide to Bill Clinton.
“we cannot understand how some of our liberal friends can so blindly support Obama”
You are dealing with people who have no concept of absolute truth, so one lie is as good as another to them.
Normalcy bias suppressing cognitive dissonance allows them to simply ignore any fact that reflects negatively on their “messiah”.
Fox News has a DNC video showing actress Kerry Washington claiming that Republicans want to deny women the right to vote, healthcare, and education. The audience cheers.
You can’t fix stupid.
Okay. Thanks.
Is is correct to say that Obama’s FnF operation had a sinister second goal of somehow raising support for more restrictive US gun laws? If so, how was that supposed to happen.
Thanks for your response.
No, Obama killed bin Laden. Seems to me that's where this story is headed. See? Obama is doing something about [fill-in-the-blank]. No details are necessary beyond that. The minds get imprinted and the MSM steamroller moves on.
If you caught Rush late Friday he said that's what's coming if Bobo gets way behind. Which I would put at a week at -7. Not impossible.
There are a couple of factors involved here.
First, with libs it is all about *feelings*. Think about high school pep rallies. Who do you cheer for? Your own team. You don’t cheer for the other school to win, even if their players are better, stronger, smarter, whatever. It is all about the tribal mentality.
Second, the way the human brain is designed makes it hard to make changes. What toothpaste do you use? I’ll bet your current tube is the same brand as the last tube. Why? Maybe because that is the brand your Mom always bought. Or maybe at one point you may have tried a few different kinds or looked into what worked best, but now you don’t stand in the grocery store for an hour and read every label when you buy toothpaste, you just buy the same thing every time because you made that decision somewhere in the past. Reexamining that decision every time you buy toothpaste just takes too much time and effort and thinking.
Yes, I know that choosing a President is not the same as choosing toothpaste, but many of the same principles apply. People are lazy.
Third, (and this is closely related to the second point): Loyalty. If your spouse dings the car, you are probably not going to get divorced over it. If your spouse totals the car, you are still not likely to get divorced over it. But if your spouse totalled a new car every week, how long do you think the marriage would last? Eventually, most people would reach the breaking point. It would be more than they could cope with.
Most dems are tolerant of a few dents in the car for what is an otherwise good relationship, in their minds. (Same for us. We never get a shiny new candidate with no flaws. We still vote for someone with some dings and scratches.) The big problem with Zippy is that he is totalled, but is hiding it. He’s had the totalled car towed away and is avoiding all questions about what happened to the car or where it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.