Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mortimer Zuckerman: Those Jobless Numbers Are Even Worse Than They Look
Wall Street Journal, ^ | September 7, 2012 | Zuckerman

Posted on 09/08/2012 10:20:33 PM PDT by george76

Still above 8%—and closer to 19% in a truer accounting...

Don't be fooled by the headline unemployment number of 8.1% announced on Friday. The reason the number dropped to 8.1% from 8.3% in July was not because more jobs were created, but because more people quit looking for work.

The number for August reflects only people who have actively applied for a job in the past four weeks, either by interview or by filling an application form. But when the average period of unemployment is nearly 40 weeks, it is unrealistic to expect everyone who needs a job to keep seeking work consistently for months on end. You don't have to be lazy to recoil from the heartbreaking futility of knocking, week after week, on closed doors.

How many people are out of work but not counted as unemployed because they hadn't sought work in the past four weeks? Eight million. This is the sort of distressing number that turns up when you look beyond the headline number.

...

The key indicator of our employment health, in all the statistics, is what the government calls U-6. This is the number who have applied for work in the past six months and includes people who are involuntary part-time workers—government-speak for those individuals whose jobs have been cut back to two or three days a week.

They are working part-time only because they've been unable to find full-time work. This involuntary army of what's called "underutilized labor" has been hovering for months at about 15% of the workforce. Include the eight million who have simply given up looking, and the real unemployment rate is closer to 19%.

In short, the president's ill-designed stimulus program was a failure

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jobless; mortimerzuckerman; zuckerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: okie01; Lancey Howard; CaptainK; Psycho_Bunny
I think not. Mort's a businessman.

Correct, though, if anything, Zuckerman leans to the right. Familiarity with his editorials (not the Op-Eds) in the Daily News would seem to indicate that. Before Obama, the News endorsed George W. Bush twice.

41 posted on 09/09/2012 6:37:03 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bitt; Perdogg; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks bitt.
42 posted on 09/09/2012 8:07:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson