Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands of Chinese protesters besiege Japanese embassy
Japan Today ^ | Sep. 15, 2012 - 09:00PM JST

Posted on 09/15/2012 3:42:36 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2012 3:42:38 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Could there be a secret Sino-AQ alliance?

Lord, have mercy!


2 posted on 09/15/2012 3:44:25 PM PDT by lightman (Settling for the "lesser of two..." is still choosing Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

the whole world is falling apart under Obama leadership or lack of leadership.


3 posted on 09/15/2012 3:46:02 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Are they sure someone didn’t make a film mocking Chairman Mao?


4 posted on 09/15/2012 3:46:09 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (“We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents.” moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Remind me again, why we have outsourced jobs to China?

Are we idiots?


5 posted on 09/15/2012 3:47:17 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Well, at least we aren’t getting All the rioting. If the CIA is smart they’ll make an anti-Mohammed film using Chinese actors, and send it to the ME with a phony trail leading back to the PRC.


6 posted on 09/15/2012 3:48:29 PM PDT by superstitionmountain (Did I mentio that I hate Chris Dodd, a rat among men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Just damn.


7 posted on 09/15/2012 3:49:02 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (The Obamas = rude, crude and socially unacceptable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I know there’s one idiot on this thread who thinks that protectionism is a sound economic policy.


8 posted on 09/15/2012 3:51:10 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

At the risk of side-tracking this thread, I started as a balls to the walls free trader.

I have changed my mind.

Now we are simply de-industrializing America.


9 posted on 09/15/2012 3:54:01 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It does not matter where you start. It’s where you end up that matters.

Nice to see the Smoot/Hawley contingent chime in, tho. People need to be reminded just how silly and dangerous you really are.


10 posted on 09/15/2012 3:57:58 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

There’s some song that says “but if you go carrying pictures of chairman mao you ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow.” They want to know who wrote it and they want an apology.


11 posted on 09/15/2012 3:58:11 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Romney/Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

War and rumors of war...


12 posted on 09/15/2012 3:59:23 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Right back at you.

Smoot/Hawley was foolish when it was done, because back then American made everything.

Now the exact reverse is at play. America imports everything, and we now have a 16 billion trade deficit.

Not sustainable.

At all.


13 posted on 09/15/2012 3:59:59 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Dear reader’s comment on this new international situation:

< crickets >


14 posted on 09/15/2012 4:02:36 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

There will be wars, and rumors of wars.

This is only the beginning.


15 posted on 09/15/2012 4:06:13 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Depends what you trade.


16 posted on 09/15/2012 4:08:09 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

We don’t import “everything”. And there is no such thing as a trade deficit. We give them money. They give us stuff. The books balance at the end of the day.

Only childish and fools believe in trade deficits.


17 posted on 09/15/2012 4:09:21 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: crz

After a certain point, no it doesn’t depend on what you trade anymore.

We are past that point.

It is time to bring industrial production back. Back to America.


18 posted on 09/15/2012 4:10:16 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: crz

I see and hear the labor pains... I think there is a “baby” about to be born... I kid not! Prepare your hearts and minds people!


19 posted on 09/15/2012 4:10:16 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Barry, Barry quite contrary, how does your government grow?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

From Wikipedia, for what it’s worth:

“The United States occupied the islands from 1945 to 1972. Both the PRC and Japan indicated their sovereignty claims with respect to the islands to the United Nations Security Council at the time of the US transfer of its administrative powers to Japan. Sovereignty over the islands would give the owner exclusive oil, mineral and fishing rights in surrounding waters. Although the United States does not have an official position on the merits of the competing sovereignty claims, the islands are included within the U.S. Japan Security Treaty meaning that a defense of the islands by Japan may compel support from the United States military.” (reference citations present in the original Wikipedia article “Senkaku Islands Dispute”, but omitted here for clarity).

Note the last sentence in the quote above, and I think it’s pretty clear why the Red Chinese are pressing their claim now, given the dolt we have in the White House.


20 posted on 09/15/2012 4:12:03 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson