1 posted on
09/23/2012 8:13:50 AM PDT by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Blocking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from conducting aerial surveillance of livestock farms to spot Clean Water Act violations would cost taxpayers $1 million a year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.Oh, so the EPA is a for profit business now?
And as a taxpayer I am forced to be a stockholder in it.
2 posted on
09/23/2012 8:24:18 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: lowbridge
Just stop the EPA. Imagine how much that will save us.
To: lowbridge
Its getting to the point that Ill have to file for a Clean Water Act permit if I want to turn the hose on in my backyard, Capito said when she introduced her bill in June. Just wait until politicians catch on and use the EPA for political gain! /s
4 posted on
09/23/2012 8:26:33 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: lowbridge
Wow, they found some place they could save a whopping million!
5 posted on
09/23/2012 8:28:03 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: lowbridge
on-site inspections at costs of up to $10,000 per location.
And why the hell is that?
6 posted on
09/23/2012 8:37:17 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: lowbridge
Total elimination of the EPA would save a lot more than that!!!!
9 posted on
09/23/2012 9:32:26 AM PDT by
dalereed
To: lowbridge
Ten grand to drive out to a farm and look at cows crap near water... Amazing. Just think if you dropped by five or six farms on the way, you could blow a years pay for a working man in one afternoon.
Sounds like bullshirt Government to me.
10 posted on
09/23/2012 9:55:25 AM PDT by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: lowbridge
This ain’t about saving money it’s about expanding their claws.
To: lowbridge
President Romney better neuter the EPA, the most tyrannical Federale agency. Bone headed tyranny that hurts our economy but keep those bloated Fderale paychecks coming. It’s their paychecks vs private businesses and our economy. EPA denizens could give a flip about the economic destruction and money loss they cause, just so long as they keep getting their paychecks.
14 posted on
09/23/2012 10:19:31 AM PDT by
dennisw
(Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
To: lowbridge
Blocking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from conducting aerial surveillance of livestock farms to spot Clean Water Act violations would cost taxpayers $1 million a year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.Uh.....how much is it going to cost to rent/lease/service airframes and hire pilots for that same time frame? No one is going to convince me that the EPA will have 1 semi-retired pilot flying an old Cessna 150 to take pictures. EPA, like all other government agencies, are FOS.
15 posted on
09/23/2012 1:34:00 PM PDT by
Sarajevo
(Don't think for a minute that this excuse for a President has America's best interest in mind.)
To: lowbridge
Uh, don't they have it exactly backwards?
Eliminating the EPA would save and generate billions and trillions.
16 posted on
09/23/2012 1:38:06 PM PDT by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson