1 posted on
09/25/2012 5:10:16 PM PDT by
Condor 63
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Condor 63
2 posted on
09/25/2012 5:10:52 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Condor 63
It will also drive up unemployment permanently
3 posted on
09/25/2012 5:11:18 PM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(Obama lied .. the economy died.)
To: Condor 63
4 posted on
09/25/2012 5:11:50 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(We canÂ’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents. -- moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
To: Condor 63
Well, for me 61, that’s when I got laid off.....never to be hired again, apparently experience is not a job enhancer.
6 posted on
09/25/2012 5:12:13 PM PDT by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: Condor 63
“Retirement” was a brief late-20th century phenomenon for a couple generations to take advantage of.
7 posted on
09/25/2012 5:13:21 PM PDT by
dk88
(Outlaw)
To: Condor 63
Amen Brother, it will take the burden off youth and put it on the aged.
Work the old farts till they die.
/s/
8 posted on
09/25/2012 5:15:57 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: Condor 63
I guess they’ve given up trying to make those who won’t work, to take it up. Instead, their solution is to make those who will, work longer...
10 posted on
09/25/2012 5:16:47 PM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Condor 63
I know a 74 year old man who still has to work full time as an auto mechanic.
11 posted on
09/25/2012 5:18:24 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: Condor 63
From my observation of the families with the best hope of retirement are the families who avoided divorce.
12 posted on
09/25/2012 5:18:57 PM PDT by
Mamzelle
To: Condor 63
If it was indexed back to the % of people who lived beyond the original retirement age from the 30s, it would now be about 75 or 76. And by the way, that would make the program solvent (assuming we get rid of Obama’s SSI give aways).
13 posted on
09/25/2012 5:20:13 PM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Condor 63
That will take the burdein off the youth.....
See the way this works is, we have to gamble on the amount of payers in the system that actually live long enough to collect.
In 2011 I attended 6 funerals. It was a tough year. I’m not that old. OF those 6 deaths, only 2 ever collected social security.
Ages:
81
66
63
59
38
45
If you had to try and sell this system to someone today that knew nothing of it and could only you one peice of paper and 90 seconds of explanation, you’d be accused of being selling snake oil.
PRIVATISE IT starting with those under 40 as an option.
17 posted on
09/25/2012 5:21:53 PM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
To: Condor 63
Well it won’t affect me any. I’ll be 79 in Dec. and still working with no end in sight. It’s good for you to keep working as long as possible. Keeps the old bones moving and the brain working. Besides you still enjoy living because you have a reason to get up in the morning. You don’t feel as if you have been sidelined as the world goes by.
18 posted on
09/25/2012 5:23:00 PM PDT by
WVNan
To: Condor 63
Seems like a pretty good reason to privatize social insecurity and take the decision out of the hands of greedy government bureaucrats.
23 posted on
09/25/2012 5:27:10 PM PDT by
Kandy Atz
("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
To: Condor 63
In case there are people who still have not figured it out, when the currency collapses, as is a mathematical certainty, all pensions go away, not to mention savings and investments.
The new world order is that you work until you croak.
26 posted on
09/25/2012 5:30:49 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: Condor 63
At the current rate of devaluation of the dollar, never.
28 posted on
09/25/2012 5:33:26 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: Condor 63
I’m sixty. I have Wonka’s golden ticket in my pocket. A class A CDL with tanker endorsement .
Here on the Bakken, all shapes and sizes, young and old work. Prepare to be cold
29 posted on
09/25/2012 5:35:27 PM PDT by
South Dakota
(shut up and drill)
To: Condor 63
I never understood the whole "retirement" concept or why it is apparently so appealing to so many people, something that people actually appear to look forward to. Why is that? Why are people so eager to reach the end of their productive lives?
To: Condor 63
Find something you really enjoy doing day in and day out because nobody is retiring.Ever.
35 posted on
09/25/2012 5:41:02 PM PDT by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: Condor 63
It used to be about 2 years beyond average life expectancy. I can remember it being common for folks retiring at 65 to pass on at 67, 68.
Once Obamacare or national Romneycare is in force, I expect life expectancy to creep downward, so setting retirement at 70 might save tons of money.
43 posted on
09/25/2012 6:08:04 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: Condor 63
It will have a pit stop at 70, before settling on 75.
That should cover our lifetimes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson