Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/25/2012 5:10:16 PM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Condor 63

70 sounds about right.


2 posted on 09/25/2012 5:10:52 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63
It will also drive up unemployment permanently
3 posted on 09/25/2012 5:11:18 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Post death.


4 posted on 09/25/2012 5:11:50 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (We canÂ’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents. -- moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Well, for me 61, that’s when I got laid off.....never to be hired again, apparently experience is not a job enhancer.


6 posted on 09/25/2012 5:12:13 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

“Retirement” was a brief late-20th century phenomenon for a couple generations to take advantage of.


7 posted on 09/25/2012 5:13:21 PM PDT by dk88 (Outlaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Amen Brother, it will take the burden off youth and put it on the aged.
Work the old farts till they die.

/s/


8 posted on 09/25/2012 5:15:57 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

I guess they’ve given up trying to make those who won’t work, to take it up. Instead, their solution is to make those who will, work longer...


10 posted on 09/25/2012 5:16:47 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

I know a 74 year old man who still has to work full time as an auto mechanic.


11 posted on 09/25/2012 5:18:24 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

From my observation of the families with the best hope of retirement are the families who avoided divorce.


12 posted on 09/25/2012 5:18:57 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

If it was indexed back to the % of people who lived beyond the original retirement age from the 30s, it would now be about 75 or 76. And by the way, that would make the program solvent (assuming we get rid of Obama’s SSI give aways).


13 posted on 09/25/2012 5:20:13 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

That will take the burdein off the youth.....

See the way this works is, we have to gamble on the amount of payers in the system that actually live long enough to collect.

In 2011 I attended 6 funerals. It was a tough year. I’m not that old. OF those 6 deaths, only 2 ever collected social security.

Ages:

81
66
63
59
38
45

If you had to try and sell this system to someone today that knew nothing of it and could only you one peice of paper and 90 seconds of explanation, you’d be accused of being selling snake oil.

PRIVATISE IT starting with those under 40 as an option.


17 posted on 09/25/2012 5:21:53 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Well it won’t affect me any. I’ll be 79 in Dec. and still working with no end in sight. It’s good for you to keep working as long as possible. Keeps the old bones moving and the brain working. Besides you still enjoy living because you have a reason to get up in the morning. You don’t feel as if you have been sidelined as the world goes by.


18 posted on 09/25/2012 5:23:00 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Seems like a pretty good reason to privatize social insecurity and take the decision out of the hands of greedy government bureaucrats.


23 posted on 09/25/2012 5:27:10 PM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63
In case there are people who still have not figured it out, when the currency collapses, as is a mathematical certainty, all pensions go away, not to mention savings and investments.

The new world order is that you work until you croak.

26 posted on 09/25/2012 5:30:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

At the current rate of devaluation of the dollar, never.


28 posted on 09/25/2012 5:33:26 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

I’m sixty. I have Wonka’s golden ticket in my pocket. A class A CDL with tanker endorsement .

Here on the Bakken, all shapes and sizes, young and old work. Prepare to be cold


29 posted on 09/25/2012 5:35:27 PM PDT by South Dakota (shut up and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63
I never understood the whole "retirement" concept or why it is apparently so appealing to so many people, something that people actually appear to look forward to. Why is that? Why are people so eager to reach the end of their productive lives?
34 posted on 09/25/2012 5:39:56 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

Find something you really enjoy doing day in and day out because nobody is retiring.Ever.


35 posted on 09/25/2012 5:41:02 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

It used to be about 2 years beyond average life expectancy. I can remember it being common for folks retiring at 65 to pass on at 67, 68.

Once Obamacare or national Romneycare is in force, I expect life expectancy to creep downward, so setting retirement at 70 might save tons of money.


43 posted on 09/25/2012 6:08:04 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Condor 63

It will have a pit stop at 70, before settling on 75.

That should cover our lifetimes.


45 posted on 09/25/2012 6:10:37 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson