Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WTIC CBS Connecticut Poll - 7.8% Unemployment: Is This A True Reading Of The Jobs Picture?
WTIC CBS ^ | 10/5/12 | Anon

Posted on 10/05/2012 10:14:40 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: spokeshave
You are just being racist by showing and comparing white goats to our dear Obozo.

Ha. ..easier to teach goats to surf than for Obama to understand how a lemonade stand works.

Goats surfing:

41 posted on 10/06/2012 8:58:14 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are the 53%, who pay taxes and keep this country going inspite of the 47% rat moochers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sox

Seeing old WTIC brought back memories! Seventy years ago we’d listen to the G.Fox Morning Watch while getting ready for school. When the Connecticut March was played at 8 it was the signal to walk down to the bottom of the hill for the school bus! Back then I was the only child whose parents voted for FDR—they were all Wilkie supporters. He was a very scary man to me.

A friend just told me last Sunday—with great disdain in her voice—that the Hartford Courant is now owned by Fox News! I made no comment (with great restraint)! The Oldest Newspaper in the United States was left-wing as long as I can remember. Must say it warmed my heart!


42 posted on 10/06/2012 9:03:28 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Just did the poll and it is still a friggin wipeout!


43 posted on 10/06/2012 9:24:32 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

When I first looked it said 14 votes then it changed to 14 comments. Someone screw up and then fixed it.


44 posted on 10/06/2012 9:36:01 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

99.25

LOL


45 posted on 10/06/2012 10:07:43 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

FEeeEEeePED:

HA!! Numbers are still holding strong!!

What happened to all that ‘hope’ and ‘change’ that was promised?

Yes. There’s A Recovery Underway 0.73%

No. Someone’s “Cooking The Books” 99.27%


46 posted on 10/06/2012 11:29:59 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (The Road to Ruin is Always Kept in Good Repair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
Well ... yes, but ... The error in the Household Survey numbers necessary to produce this result is way outside the statistical expectation for a 95% confidence interval. I haven't calculated it myself, and I could only get a rough idea of how large the error bars would have to be to include a result this crazy. Another FReeper claims the survey found almost 900,000 new jobs (actually that's public information) and estimated the error is +/-435,000. Inasmuch as -410,000 would increase the unemployment back to 8% you get closer, but you're really still off the actual number by 0.2%. In other words, almost all of the 900,000 has to be wrong, which is statistically about as close to impossible as you and me both being killed by meteors before I finish typing this sentence.

Still here, so ...

The big question is: why does the huge spike occur in the 20-24 age group? This is weird because the 0bama administration has already been getting an enormous fig-leaf from Baby Boomers who're leaving the workforce a few months or years early, but an increase in the 20-24 age group has a VERY HIGH stank-factor.

My suspicion is that they've changed the way they asked the question so that students looking for part-time work for the summer who have reported back to school are being dropped from the rolls -- and since temporary workers wouldn't have been ON the rolls in the first place ... Viola! 900,000 people who previously weren't really looking for work (and weren't counted) are now magically counted as not looking for work anymore.

All anybody needs to know about this is that we've had net jobs numbers in the mid to low 100,000's for several months, and there has been no real change to unemployment during those months. Suddenly, 114,000 new jobs takes the rate down by 0.3-0.4%! AND ... even more suspiciously, the UNDEREMPLOYMENT number has not moved -- it's still 14.7%. How is it even possible that we found almost 900,000 new jobs, but NONE of the people who want more work than they currently have were able to get more hours or more permanent positions?

It's a story that only someone credulous (read: gullible) enough to believe the original excuse for the Benghazi murders could possibly believe.

47 posted on 10/06/2012 3:06:56 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And that's the end of our show! Doink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: alrea

Chris Christie, and the people who elected him, would disagree; when things get this bad, libs elect grown-ups to fix them.


48 posted on 10/06/2012 3:07:47 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Headlines of the Article...

New Hampshire Resident: ‘Obama Couldn’t Run A Lemonade Stand’

49 posted on 10/06/2012 3:16:16 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson