Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Won't Endorse Romney, Sees "Essentially No Difference"
The New American ^ | 10-12-12 | Jack Kenny

Posted on 10/12/2012 3:00:10 PM PDT by kingattax

Ron Paul, the maverick Texas congressman who has twice run for the Republican presidential nomination, won't endorse the nominee of his party. Though Paul said last week it was "very unlikely" he would endorse former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, he made it definitive in an interview October 12 on the CNBC program Futures Now.

"No," he said, plainly and unequivocally, when asked about an endorsement. Neither the GOP challenger nor President Obama will change the course of fiscal and monetary policy that is leading to what has been called the "fiscal cliff," Paul said, because both are captive of special interests.

And neither will act to stop the Federal Reserve from papering over the growing chasm of debt by inflating the money supply in a policy called "quantitative easing."

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Steamburg

That’s what happens when people stop thinking with their heads and start letting their wish list become their reality.
We can only hope the little roach gets stepped on in the near future. Rand needs to learn from this. He is not bigger than his supporters and he is relevant only so long as his message is coherent.


Okay..I’m somebody who was praying that Palin would run. So, I looked at Cain, then Paul. I participated in the caucus, cast my vote and my guy lost in the long run. So, I wait it out and see Romney is the fella that the majority of the REPUBLICAN party wants.

My next choice is to stay home...NOT going to happen, cast my vote for someone other than Obama and Romney...NOT going to happen, vote Obama..Not in this lifetime OR any other, or vote for Romney..yeah, I can and will do that.

I’m not a purist .. I’m not close-minded..I want the best for my country. Paul is acting like the kid that takes his ball and goes home..and so are SOME of his supporters.

This is the old “paint ‘em all with a broad brush” crap. Just because I like the fiscal policies that Paul put forth, I can’t justify staying home or voting for Paul. How does that change the mess we’re in?

I guess I just want to make it clear that there are plenty of people that had their eye on Palin, Paul and others that are indeed voting for Mr. Romney.

I’ll also go as far as saying that I really had to hold my nose and vote for McCain last time around. The only reason that I could do it at all was because of Palin. I don’t have that negative feeling with the Romney/Ryan ticket.

Just wanted to vent a wee bit.


81 posted on 10/12/2012 5:34:36 PM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe
Hey pal peddle your book with someone other than me..

Radio host and author of Ameritopia, Mark Levin says, "As we head into the most important election of our lifetime, C. Edmund Wright reminds us why, and gives us a laugh at the same time."

As Herman Cain says, "C. Edmund Wright's sharp wit has been a must-read on the web for years, and now you must read this book!"

Called "rocking great fun that hits liberals in their weak spot, reality,” by Mary Matalin

82 posted on 10/12/2012 5:43:45 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If I were Mitt, I’d be greatly relieved. LOL


83 posted on 10/12/2012 5:43:53 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
I am done with him...I see no difference in him and Biden

My first reaction upon reading the headline what "What a jackass!" - which is exactly what Judge Napolitano said today about Biden. We agree.

84 posted on 10/12/2012 5:53:44 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
My first reaction upon reading the headline what "What a jackass!"

Cong. Paul is leaving public life.

He won't be missed...

85 posted on 10/12/2012 6:03:04 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Ron Paul ran as a Republican and should have endorsed the nominee.

You are correct, sir.

86 posted on 10/12/2012 6:04:09 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Paul refuses to support Romney because he does not want to disappoint his base, which is made up primarily of antiwar nuts who live in their parents’ basements. Sure, Paul does make a lot of sense when he talks about fiscal responsibility, but that is not why he has such a fanatical following. Most of those die-hard fans are much closer to being whacked out Democrats in their beliefs than conservative Republicans. Ron Paul is far less concerned about the future of our country than he is about the future of his cult status.
87 posted on 10/12/2012 6:04:48 PM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Isn’t Ron Paul part of the reason Romney is the nominee? And now he has the nerve not to endorse him.


88 posted on 10/12/2012 6:13:16 PM PDT by ThomasSawyer (Democratic Underground: Proof that anyone can figure out how to use a computer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Ron Paul likes Obama stance against Israel too much. Maybe Pres. Hussein can invite Iranian press tv to interview him as Ron Paul did.


89 posted on 10/12/2012 6:17:28 PM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Ron, yuh big dummy! The ain’t the same! Romney’s the white guy with the sane VP.


90 posted on 10/12/2012 6:29:30 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Further proof that Paul is mentally deficient.


91 posted on 10/12/2012 8:07:46 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"defective judgment"

Paul exhibits the same kind of political xenophobia that made Birchers conclude Eisenhower was a communist. He might have some legitimate points to make about spending and a few other areas, but overall he comes off as a nut.

92 posted on 10/12/2012 8:11:26 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

No need for me to add anything, you pretty much laid down the landscape.


93 posted on 10/12/2012 8:48:34 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AK_47_7.62x39

Is reassuring Obama’s re-election the best scenario for the USA?

Voting is a civic duty is it not? How does throwing a tantrum and taking your ball and going home because you didn’t get your way beneficial to the country? I thought that part of being an adult or a good citizen was sometimes having to make decisions out of less than perfect options.

Yes, I have heard all of the arguments. NO MORE!! blah, blah blah. Or the better one, someone Romney will make things worse and then it will get blamed on the GOP.

Those are all strawman arguments. One, I do not think that Romney could be worse than Zero. I definitely didn’t support him in the primaries. But if given the choice between him and Zero, I choose Romney. At least with him there is a snowball’s chance of getting something done to fix this mess, even more so with a GOP House and Senate. With Zero, there is no chance, no matter who controls the House and Senate. Not to mention the fact the we WILL lose the SCOTUS for a generation or two. And we know that Romney is a US citizen and does not hate this country. And to think that he and Obama are the same in their views of how to run an economy and their qualifications is ignorant at best.

Obviously, we all needed to support our candidate in the primaries. But in the general election, we MUST be rid of Obama. If not, we can all pat ourselves on the back and gloat about how “principled” we are as the country we love circles the drain.

Besides, I do not know why sitting out the election because the “right” candidate (whatever that is)was not nominated is considered the only position of principle. My position is also one of principle, defeat Obama. When I vote against Obama, I will be doing so with just as much principle as the person who withholds their vote because they didn’t get their way.

This is nothing personal towards you, it is just so frustrating to see this sentiment so prevalent on this site. Do you think the average voter thinks this way? They will vote one way or the other. If true blue Conservatives won’t support the GOP candidate, why should they? In the end, politics is the art of the possible.

You have to hand it to liberals and Fabian Socialists for one thing. They understand incrementalism. They seem to be smart enough to understand that in the real world you usually don’t get everything that you want in one fell swoop. Why can’t Conservatives understand this?


94 posted on 10/12/2012 10:44:07 PM PDT by BizBroker (Democrats know nothing. If they knew that they knew nothing, that would be something. But they don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Does Ron Paul endorse anyone but himself and his “traitorous” son who obviously has a slightly different world-view?


95 posted on 10/13/2012 2:35:50 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

No essential difference. Not voting for Romney. Like RP.


96 posted on 10/13/2012 2:49:09 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

No essential difference. Not voting for Romney. Like RP.


97 posted on 10/13/2012 2:49:24 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Buh-bye, Paul.


98 posted on 10/13/2012 3:09:48 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Just Uncle Crazy being Uncle Crazy.


99 posted on 10/13/2012 5:05:47 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

bttt


100 posted on 10/13/2012 5:34:40 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson