Posted on 10/27/2012 2:37:01 AM PDT by uncitizen
September 9, Egypt – Clips of The Innocence of Muslims are shown on Egyptian television.
September 10 – Al Qaeda emir Ayman al Zawahiri releases through jihadist websites a video eulogy for slain al Qaeda leader Abu Yahya al Libi and says that his organization and its ideology are alive. Zawahiri says that Libi’s “blood is calling, urging and inciting you to fight and kill the crusaders.” Ayman al Zawahiri uses the video to boast that al Qaeda has not been defeated, but its “message has spread amongst our Muslim Ummah, which received it with acceptance and responded to it.” A clip of Mohammed al Zawahiri, Ayman’s brother (who told CNN earlier this year that al Qaeda’s strength is “not in its leaders but in its ideology”) is included in the video.
September 11, Cairo, Egypt (early morning) – The U.S. embassy issues a statement indirectly denouncing The Innocence of Muslims. According to the Washington Post, the embassy condemns efforts made by “misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims—as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.” Parts of the statement are also released via Twitter.
September 11, Cairo (morning) – A large crowd carrying numerous al Qaeda flags protests outside the U.S. embassy. Protesters scale the embassy’s wall, raise the flag commonly used by Al Qaeda in Iraq, and burn the Stars and Stripes. The protesters chant in Arabic: “Obama! Obama! We are all Osama!” A similar refrain is spray-painted on walls near the embassy. Mohammed al Zawahiri is interviewed by a jihadist propaganda outlet in front of the embassy. He admits to CNN he helped stage the protest.
September 11, Benghazi, Libya (about 2:30 p.m. EDT) – Stevens walks his guests out of the compound and onto the street. no sign of a protest.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
It also shows tho, how the media, Wolf Blitzer for one, had called this out as terrorism on the 12th, before the other 2 embassies were assaulted.
and on the 14th, after the Tunisia embassy attack, Hillary makes a speech at Andrews AFB talking about "rage and violence directed against our embassies about some violent video ".
Putting it all in sequence like the timeline does makes me think that on the 12th, O and Hill were getting worried. Too much heat on Benghazi. maybe we spread the violence out somewhat and take attention away from Benghazi. so yes, I'm saying maybe the other embassy violence was also of Obama ans Hillary's own making! she mentions all three events at Andrews together like they are all related to some video, which we know she knew wasn't true. so if she wasn't involved with the Yemen and Tunisia attacks, then shouldn't they be doing an investigation as to what happened in those embassies too? Or do they only "investigate" when we pin them to the wall about something that doesn't smell right?
Quote from his campaign press secretary:
“President Obama is he only candidate in this race who is going to continue to fight for Big Bird & Elmo.”
Well yeah, there are priorities and then there are priORities.
“There’s a broader lesson to be learned here,” Mr. Obama told “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft at the White House. “And I — you know, Governor Romney seems to have a tendency to shoot first and aim later. And as president, one of the things I’ve learned is you can’t do that. That, you know, it’s important for you to make sure that the statements that you make are backed up by the facts. And that you’ve thought through the ramifications before you make ‘em.”
Not sure of ur point there tiger. But I will say this, Obama has forfeited his right to give advice to anyone. as if he really meant a single word that comes out of his mouth.
I wouldn’t be the least shocked if it turned out that Hill and O started trouble at the other embassies to divert attention away from Benghazi, would you?
Not sure of ur point there tiger. But I will say this, Obama has forfeited his right to give advice to anyone. as if he really meant a single word that comes out of his mouth.
I wouldn’t be the least shocked if it turned out that Hill and O started trouble at the other embassies to divert attention away from Benghazi, would you?
Ping
FWIW, many of the activities identified with planned terrorism, at the hands of Al Qaeda, when promulgated on a global level, never seem to involve more than about 3-5 concurrent operations. Ever since 9-11, this is true of publicized events attributed to Al Qaeda.
In 9-11, 4-5 planes involved.
for 9/11/12 only several embassies involved, this time at the embassies in somewhat of a sequential fashion, but probably all commenced concurrently with decentralized control of each operation.
This trait, though, flies in the face of their training and planning philosophy. Their objective is global Islam by decentralized militant actions. Their incentive is not just a handful of highly publicized events, but rather a global mayhem.
This leads me to consider these campaigns are characterized by a limited span of control, indicative of the organizing structure’s capacity to control with centralized command and centralized control, up to a point of plausible deniability.
I’d dare say all the embassy attacks/protests on 9/11/12 were ultimately orchestrated by this Administration, using them as resources to maneuver other social events. The span of control matches their lust for power and control of events.
You are right. it’s all suspect. I’m sorry for those people with family in the military like my sisters son. To have a CIC that thinks the military are just people who work under him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.