Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/28/2012 6:09:49 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

posted prior: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2950841/posts



Skip to comments.

BOMBSHELL: US Forces Would Not Have Been Painting Targets on Ground Unless Air Support Overhead
Gateway Pundit ^ | 10/26/12

Posted on 10/28/2012 4:10:13 PM PDT by Truthhunter1

...Then there’s this bombshell at BlackFive from a former Delta operator:

Having spent a good bit of time nursing a GLD (ground Laser Designator) in several garden spots around the world, something from the report jumped out at me.

One of the former SEALs was actively painting the target. That means that Specter WAS ON STATION! Probably an AC130U. A ground laser designator is not a briefing pointer laser. You do not “paint” a target until the weapons system/designator is synched; which means that the AC130 was on station.

Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.

If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.

If that SEAL was actively “painting” a target; something was on station to engage! And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!

This is HUGE. It should be obvious by now that someone is not telling the truth.

As Blackfive says,

“This is bigger than Watergate!… The worst has to be the team on the ground knowing that the President just left you to die.“

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abdication; benghazi; benghazigate; cas; derelictionofduty; libya; libyagate; obama4alqaeda; obama4terrorists; obamaabdication; obamatreason; obamavsamerica; treason

1 posted on 10/28/2012 4:10:16 PM PDT by Truthhunter1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

Bombshell fatigue...why did it HAVE to be an AC-130 —tell me that.


2 posted on 10/28/2012 4:12:55 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 10/28/2012 4:13:48 PM PDT by Nachum (The List was hacked- www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

In case you didn’t make it to the MEAT of the article:

... General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

The story continues that now General Rodiguez would take General Ham’s place as the head of Africom.

>http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/28/general-losing-his-job-over-benghazi/#ixzz2AdRU2jHi<


4 posted on 10/28/2012 4:14:03 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

obama had to be very cautious, you know
Some of his campaign donors might have been in that attacking force


5 posted on 10/28/2012 4:15:36 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone


Graphic below posted by former Navy Seal TravisMcGee!



VOTE THE MARXIST OUT!

6 posted on 10/28/2012 4:18:48 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Says AC-130 had to be on station, THEN says an armed Predator was there....inconsistent and speculative without being honest about it.

They’re taking a totally legit scandal and Alex Jones/Art Bell-ing it to death.


7 posted on 10/28/2012 4:18:48 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G Larry; Nachum; RedMDer; DJ MacWoW

BTTT


8 posted on 10/28/2012 4:20:09 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

This thread is already here and long and great. Join it

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2950841/posts


9 posted on 10/28/2012 4:20:18 PM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

Maybe one of the drones had some birds.


10 posted on 10/28/2012 4:23:34 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obama didn't fix it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1
C130 on site.

A ten to twenty second burst would have made a large difference.

Stop Jihad Now! (Zer0 is FOR Jihad.)

11 posted on 10/28/2012 4:25:19 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

Tough weekend for the liberal media. Benghazi is way worse than Iran Contra. Benghazi is way worse than DESERT ONE. Benghazi is way worse than Watergate. And it’s all Democrat. Oh, the dream has died. Switching the tv on and off, hoping beyond hope that FOX News doesn’t run a story about who has been giving money to the Democrats to set the Middle East on fire. Would they really throw the Secretary of State and the President, our “higher plane” President, into prison? “What’s going to happen to me when everyone realizes I’ve been covering for criminals? Is that considered ‘accessory’?”


12 posted on 10/28/2012 4:28:10 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Hurricane Benghazi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gf8lHz_7R_Y


13 posted on 10/28/2012 4:29:55 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Chris Wallace asked Senator Warner about that and he wouldn’t answer if the drones were armed


14 posted on 10/28/2012 4:29:58 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx

This Anti-Colonialist doesn’t want to admit we had power over Libya, and he certainly didn’t want to send troops in!


15 posted on 10/28/2012 4:31:25 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

No, it said that a Spectre was **probably** on station but if, as Panetta says, it never scrambled, then it was an armed Predator. Bottom line: there is no painting of a target without there being SOMETHING real nearby ready to drop ordnance...and somebody VERY high up stopped it. I, too, would like to see firm evidence on this and other aspects up this f’ed up tragedy, but POTUS and his crew are desperately trying to classify everything to prevent it from blowing up pre-election. This means that all ANYONE can do is speculate, unless they’re in the know and wish to risk a court martial or criminal charges.


16 posted on 10/28/2012 4:32:48 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (Why do blacks think that a half-white multi-millionairre really cares about them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

“I told them to secure our personnel and do what we need to”
What kind of a directive is that based on what was going on at the time? That sounds more like a statement that has gone through 10 or 15 lawyers before it was even said.

Any executive that would give such a “directive” should get an “F” because it doesn’r really say much of anything. It is a statement that can later be twisted this way and that.
It in no way gives anyone any idea what to do. “Do what we need to” what the hell does that mean?

Just put those comments in place of some of our most famous moments in history where the Commander in Chief needed to act decisively. He didn’t say that. If he did how did anyone (subordinate) know “what we need to do” means?

Is “what we need to do” mean NOTHING?
Maybe so. Maybe after a 5 pm conversation with Panetta and the General they decided that what they need to do is NOTHING. Then the Directive was given. “Do what we need to do”. Panetta interpreted it as NOTHING.


17 posted on 10/28/2012 4:37:02 PM PDT by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

Calm down, we’ll get this all sorted out after Nov 6. /s


18 posted on 10/28/2012 4:41:56 PM PDT by umgud (No Rats, No Rino's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

Obama couldn’t be bothered with these details, he had a campaign event to attend.


19 posted on 10/28/2012 4:44:32 PM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
"Switching the tv on and off...."

LOL. Is a reboot the same as a reset?

20 posted on 10/28/2012 4:44:38 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

“This is bigger than Watergate!…

Watergate was a stupid endeavor that should not have happened. Nixon didn’t even know about when it took place.

Nixon covered up for his subordinates, which was a mistake, and it led to his downfall. the press was all over it. if Nixon would have not had tried to cover it up, he would have got off.

Where are the “press” today? with few exceptions, they are aiding and abetting the coverup. Fox and some others, excluded, of course.

Sen. Goldwater (whom I loved) “the Statesman” told the president that the jig was up and he could either resign or be impeached. He placed his love of the country above His party.

Nixon could no longer be trusted. of course the clintoon did even worse.

find me a statesman that is a ‘rat? should i write a letter to sen. turban durbin (I call him dirtbag dick durbin, but turbin durbin seems to be what those on FR prefer) and expect an answer? is he a statesman? think not

there is NO MAN OR WOMAN in the ‘rat party that will put America first over their socialist/communist/islamic kissing party.

Blessings, Bobo


21 posted on 10/28/2012 4:51:38 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1
The discussion thread on BlackFive is worth checking and rechecking.

When I linked to it originally, (on Friday, October 26, 2012 4:20:19 PM by Sir Napsalot), there were only 9 comments. Now the comments grew to over 80. Be sure to read to the end of the BlackFive comment thread. Especially don't miss the following one

Duck Bank said in reply to D... (October 28, 2012 at 04:34 AM)

"Tonight on The Dark and Secret Place radio show, hosted by Desert Storm, Kosovo, and OIF veteran Bryan Suits on KFI AM 640, Los Angeles, he had a former member of the Combatant Commanders In-Extremis Force. This guy said that the CIF is a "green light" organization that is automatically readied for exactly the sort of circumstance that was happening in Benghazi.

He said Panetta is lying, because the CIF is sent in regardless of what's known. On his previous missions, he'd gone in only knowing that there was an attack happening. Benghazi had the largest bonanza of information he ever would've encountered in his career: real-time overhead video, exact locations, number of enemy involved, and number of people to rescue.

He also said that there was no mission to which the CIF would not be committed. Their job is to go in and kill as many of the enemy as possible when our people are in extremis, which means every man in the unit fully expects to face daunting, even overwhelming odds. That's their job. The risk to them is not a consideration, because they spend all their time training, firing off unbelievable amounts of ammunition and preparing for exactly this mission.

Suits said he won't reveal their mode of travel, but he said they could've been in Benghazi much faster than most people realize.

In short, both Suits and this former member of the CIF said that everything we're hearing is a lie. The "fog of war" excuse is a lie, and so is the claim that it would've been too risky to send in any troops.

Panetta also said he conferred with General Ham, but two weeks after the attack Ham said in an interview nobody asked him whether or not to send in troops.

And now the AP is reporting that there were 150 attackers in technicals with antiaircraft machine guns.

That means Obama, Panetta, Hillary, Biden, and Dempsey all watched this massive assault unfold in real time, did nothing about it except send eight doomed security contractors from Tripoli, and then lied about it ever since.

......."

Regardless 'target painted' or not, we KNOW Panetta lied. And who else?

22 posted on 10/28/2012 4:56:08 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

I ok ya used four astericks to highlight the word, “probably”, a word indicating honesty about what was known or unknown. In WHICH paragraph in the original can you cite use of that word...?

I agree this is a huuuuuge scandal. I agree Obama is at fault.

WHICH PARAGRAPH.


23 posted on 10/28/2012 4:58:17 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Great reporting, there.


24 posted on 10/28/2012 5:03:22 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1
Follow the money. Stevens was not scheduled to be in Benghazi that day, a last minute change. A Turkish diplomat his last rendezvous, and only appointment. A Turkish Leader who loathes Assad, and has been shooting at Syria for 2 weeks. Hundreds of “stinger” style shoulder mounted anti-aircraft weapons that Stevens was chasing down in eastern Libya. The very reason there even was a consulate in Benghazi. And a Presidential campaign needing donors, and/or an October Surprise.
The biggest question here is WHY a Libyan Ambassador would meet a Turkish Ambassador in an Al-Queda in the Maghreb controlled territory in Libya? Indeed Why even have a consulate there, when there was an Embassy in Tripoli?
25 posted on 10/28/2012 5:05:36 PM PDT by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; Travis McGee
Former Navy SEAL, author and FReeper Travis McGee echoes everything that Bryan Suits' caller said about embassy rescue missions in the following post...

Long ago I was a SEAL officer... (his post at link)

To summarize them both; these CIF teams and other assets don't sit on the ground waiting for a 'go' order. They get in the air or water and make as much time towards the target as possible while the bigwigs decide what to do.

Only the POTUS had the authority to say 'yay' or 'nay' on a rescue!

26 posted on 10/28/2012 5:20:01 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

“If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.”

When one or more sides are lying, different partially-consistent hypotheses become in play. According to the Delta person, if someone was painting a target, that means a weapon was on scene and ready to fire at said painted target. But no attack happened, therefore, an order to stand down had to have been issued, and it could only have come from a high place.


27 posted on 10/28/2012 5:22:03 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Had a good chuckle after reading your bio. ; ) The dogs are awesome.


28 posted on 10/28/2012 5:24:33 PM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Careful here, this isn’t a slam dunk. You can paint a target for a LATER strike. This is key, but not the key.


29 posted on 10/28/2012 5:26:38 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swamprebel
Why even have a consulate there,

I should point out that the term "consulate" is a misnomer - THIS WAS NOT A CONSULATE.

I read an article that said this: A consulate has a "consul": a permanent diplomat dealing with visas and there for citizens of the represented country.

Benghazi was not such a place. It was a "mission". This article explained that the govt people had not used teh term "consulate" but had let the press get away with it.

So, what was the purpose of the "mission" ? I think the gun-running angle has already been mentioned.

30 posted on 10/28/2012 5:27:32 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

31 posted on 10/28/2012 5:33:12 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Thank you for the link, re: Travis McGee.

We should alert this thread to as many ping list (you think would be interested) as possible.

Spread it wide, so that even the civvies will have the WH COVER UP on their minds.

32 posted on 10/28/2012 5:34:32 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: swamprebel

The Obama ad with Morgan Freeman narrating was just on and something in that ad just made me very angry. It says:
“... four years later, our enemies have been brought to justice. Our heroes are coming home...”
Obviously, the recent events in Benghazi show that enemies have not been brought to justice and our current Administration believes in leaving our heroes behind and ignore repeated requests for help.
I can’t believe that OUR COUNTRY would EVER do something like this. Please tell me this is just a dream...a nightmare that will end soon. Because part of my nightmare is telling me that an election is about to be stolen and current coward in chief is going to have another 4 years.


33 posted on 10/28/2012 5:35:21 PM PDT by Baumer (Most areas of Washington are Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Chris Wallace asked Senator Warner about that and he wouldn’t answer if the drones were armed

Hmmm. Interesting. If he didn't know he most likely would have said "I don't know" wouldn't he?

34 posted on 10/28/2012 5:35:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Truthhunter1

I’m confused

are people shocked that 0bama wouldn’t harm Muslims or that he deliberately caused, thru inaction, the deaths of American citizens and military personnel?

we’ve been saying he’s an anti-American commie for 4 years. what did they think we meant?


35 posted on 10/28/2012 5:45:12 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag
You can paint a target for a LATER strike.

What would be the use of painting a target, unless there was an asset in the sky capable of observing and acting upon the paint?

And how much later? Later enough to ask, "Mr. President, we've locked onto some bad Mooselimbs lobbing mortar shells at our SEALs. Ok if we waste 'em?" I would think the position of a mortar crew would be very perishable information.

36 posted on 10/28/2012 5:48:49 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
OK, would it be more accurate for the record then to say that we had 41 State Dept. and CIA employees there, one the ambassador to Libya, pinned down and taking fire and in great jeopardy of all being killed?

FWIW the term 'diplomatic mission' has been around for a long time and is used to refer to any outpost of the State Dept. or the diplomatic corps themselves.

37 posted on 10/28/2012 5:49:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Everytime I read that it brings tears to my eyes...


38 posted on 10/28/2012 5:49:48 PM PDT by krunkygirl (force multiplier in effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baumer

I think Obama is toast. Liberals I know are in a very defeated state of mind, their fear is palpable. I think it has been Romney’s race since his stellar performance in the first debate, where America learned Romney was not the caricature the Obama campaign had portrayed him as. Even Obama has been flailing about since then, grasping for an issue. Cheating has always happened, it can push a point or two, but I’m starting to sense a Romney by 8 or 10 scenario. Cheating can’t over come that. It’s ground game time now, and even the weather is not cooperating with the liberals. They can’t go to the Eastern States they need, like Virginia, and don’t know if the Blue States in New England will even have electricity on election day. They are definitely panicked.


39 posted on 10/28/2012 5:50:55 PM PDT by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: swamprebel

I too see how it looks as if Romney is moving toward victory. I just worry about rampant cheating going on that could steal enough votes in any one of the states that could give a lump of electoral votes to the coward in chief.
I’m from WA state where the Dems in one county of our state have stolen enough votes to turn statewide elections before.


40 posted on 10/28/2012 6:00:12 PM PDT by Baumer (Most areas of Washington are Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I think so.

I think they want this thing kept under wraps until the election


41 posted on 10/28/2012 6:00:36 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Baumer

I have seen all kinds of voting machine irreggularities and vote scams in North Carolina, Colorado and Nevada


42 posted on 10/28/2012 6:01:42 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Baumer

Voter fraud has to be done covertly. My feeling is that their is simply too much needed at this point to keep it underwraps. I’m in Fla. so I too have seen a lot of fraud. I’ll never forget 2000.


43 posted on 10/28/2012 6:06:16 PM PDT by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson