Posted on 10/30/2012 5:19:31 PM PDT by Domandred
Speaking at a photo opportunity at the American Red Cross on Tuesday, President Obama stated that in America, "we leave nobody behind." This remark is seen as clumsy and perhaps insensitive considering the revelations that requests to assist two Navy SEALs trapped on the roof of the American consulate in Benghazi were denied, thus abandoning the heroic Americans to die at the hands of Al Qaeda.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
” - - - requests to assist two Navy SEALs trapped on the roof of the American consulate in Benghazi were denied, thus abandoning the heroic Americans to die at the hands of Al Qaeda. - - - “
Sure looks like Obama ‘The Benghazi Kid’ left the two Navy Seals behind. Yup sure looks like it - - - .
” - - - Obama stated that in America, “we leave nobody behind.”
“ - - - Obama stated that in America, “we leave nobody behind.”
“ - - - Obama stated that in America, “we leave nobody behind.”
You lie Obama, you lie.
He means it as “We leave no body behind”... meaning that he doesn’t care if they died - as long as we recover the remains, then he has lived up to that venerated promise.
Devastating (to Obama) video link.
Obama: “We Leave Nobody Behind” (except Libyan Embassy personnel)
http://youtu.be/kf72A1kXw80
I’m heading elsewhere for the remaining of my awake hours. Do have a great upcoming day. Now signing off.
Bill, what worries me is this:
The near-openly complicit media won’t report on Americans killed in Libya. Do you think a near-openly complicit media report on a Romney win at the polls?
And if they don’t — and Obozo declares “I won” — then what? Do you have confidence in the Repub “leaders” to fight that battle?
I don’t.
Extreme hypocrisy seems to be something he, and those like him actually relish. It is like they get some kind of twisted, demented kick out turning things backwards and using good for their evil purposes. They do something incredibly evil against that which is good, and then they loudly proclaim that they are doing that very same good they just tried to destroy. It happens too often, and seems like they may be doing it on purpose. I think that at the bottom of everything else they are knowing Satan worshipers, and this form of twisted hypocrisy may somehow play into their trying to gain evil power.
Ah sweet figured it would show up there. Love Breitbart but the system they use for streaming videos kind of sucks.
Ah sweet figured it would show up there. Love Breitbart but the system they use for streaming videos kind of sucks.
just when i think i can’t despise this cockroach anymore..
Thanks. Good Graphic.
___________________
My best guess is that on the night of 9-11 and the AM of 9-12, Obama was in another one of his drug-induced hazes just like he was on the night of his first TV Debate with Romney.
In his drug-induced stupor Obama chose to protect his claim that he had ended the War on Terror, and thus would get easily re-elected.
The inconvenient truth was the al-Qaeda planned attack on two US complexes on 9-11-12 would be the signal that the Arab Street had rejected Obama’s Foreign Policy.
Never one to grasp reality beyond wildly cheering crowds at his “eye-candyness,” Obama then chose to falsify the reason behind the Benghazi Attacks by approving a hastily thrown together coverup story, probably dreamed up by Jarret and Axelrod.
The requests for military help kept coming in, further adding to the distraction of Obama’s blurred thoughts, and he vetoed all assistance in order to: 1.) simplify, 2.) keep his false story consistent, and 3.) get some much needed sleep before he had to make that long hard trip to Sin City, Nevada in the afternoon. After all, he was in a Photo Op in Maryland at 1 AM on 9-12!
At his Nevada fund raiser Obama thanked his campaign workers for being heroic soldiers, and in his drug-fried brain all was in order.
____________
BTW, could Obama pass a random drug test?
What is good enough for our airline pilots and highest paid athletes should be good enough for the most powerful man in the World.
Oh, they're openly complicit, unapologetic, and for some of them - these are, mostly, fairly young people - it's the only environment they've ever known their entire professional careers. Theirs is a world where truth depends on consensus, not fact, and so he or she who controls the narrative controls the consensus and therefore the truth.
That sort of collective illusion tends to encounter reality like a bug encounters a windshield. Certainly if Romney wins some of them will insist on claiming otherwise. It will not matter.
What I'm suggesting is that a large number of media illusion-makers are about to find out that when the scenery comes crashing down it tends to be uncomfortable for those underneath, even if that scenery consists of styrofoam Greek columns at an 0bama love-fest. They won't be taking over the country by force. It isn't in them. They'll be much happier in opposition anyway, where their illusions are much less challenged.
And so to the topic of the Republican "leaders". Some will fight, but some, maybe a majority, are just as much believers in illusion as their Democrat counterparts. Fortunately for us, the country doesn't really depend on politicians, or media celebrities either. They need to relearn that lesson every so often, and I pray they're about to.
He leaves no bodies, or other evidence left behind, or he wishes.
The original of this graphic was deleted from SOS page on Facebook. Said it went against Facebook’s posting rules. They put it back up and their page was suspended for 24 hours.
I feel like I am living in the Twilight Zone. All of this is so surreal it’s hard to believe it could possibly be real.
Thanks Graewoulf.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.