Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama,Biden indicted by Florida Grand Jury
Freedoml Watch | 10/30/12

Posted on 10/30/2012 7:11:47 PM PDT by Captain7seas

Obama and Biden Indicted by Grand Jury

(Ocala, Florida, October 30, 2012). Larry Klayman, the founder and chairman of Freedom Watch today announced that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden have been criminally indicted for having willfully released classified national security information concerning the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound, U.S. and Israeli war plans concerning Iran and their cyber-attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The release of this information, among other harm to U.S. national security, resulted in the killing of members of Seal Team Six by terrorists and the arrest and imprisonment of American covert agents by Pakistan, such as the doctor who aided the CIA with regard to the bin Laden assassination. U.S.-Israeli war plans with Iran have also been compromised.

A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens’ Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.

The authority for a Citizens’ Grand Jury can be found at www.citizensgrandjury.com.

The criminal defendants, Obama and Biden, will now be given notice of their indictment, arraigned and then tried for their alleged crimes.

Mr. Klayman, the Citizens’ Prosecutor, issued the following statement: “The Citizens’ Grand Jury, after having deliberated, yesterday issued a true bill of indictment. See www.citizensgrandjury.com It did the work that the government should have done, but does not have the integrity to do; that is hold these public officials accountable under the law. For far too long, government prosecutors, who are put in place by politicians, have looked the other way as high public officials like Obama and Biden violate the law to further their political agendas.

Now, as a result, the people must therefore exercise the rights given to them by the framers of the Constitution, and themselves take legitimate measures to restore the nation to some semblance of legality.

This indictment (see www.citizensgrandjury.com) of Obama and Biden is just the first step in a legal revolution to reclaim the nation from establishment politicians, government officials and judges who have represented only their own political and other interests at the expense of ‘We the People.’

Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes.”

For information see www.citizensgrandjury.com or contact Adrienne Mazzone: 561-750-9800 x210; amazzone@transmediagroup.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: indicment; obama; vanity

1 posted on 10/30/2012 7:11:49 PM PDT by Captain7seas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Its not a true criminal indictment and the MSM will ignore it.


2 posted on 10/30/2012 7:14:05 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved FrieGrnd Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Isn’t this a waste of time considering who is in charge of the DOJ?


3 posted on 10/30/2012 7:14:21 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Poor old Larry—ya gotta give him E for Effort if nothing else..........


4 posted on 10/30/2012 7:14:51 PM PDT by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
No doubt Obama and Biden will ignore it as well, and with total impunity. Another Larry Klayman fundraising letter will be arriving shortly at a mailbox near you.
5 posted on 10/30/2012 7:19:51 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Too bad, Larry has fallen in with the Common Law, the IRS is not legal non elected lets form our own grand jury nuts.


6 posted on 10/30/2012 7:22:27 PM PDT by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas
RE :”Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes.”

This is downright silly. If this was real then Cindy Sheenan could have held a citizens court full of Dems as jury and ‘convicted’ GWB of whatever pe-ed them off.

The POTUS can legally declassify any info he wants. HE is C+C

Stay with Benghazi

7 posted on 10/30/2012 7:27:25 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Technically no; a grand jury has the ability to issue Presentments. which are binding orders for prosecution.
A grand jury is the government's worst nightmare because they have no legitimate way to restrict the grand jury (read the grand jury is independent enough to root out government corruption). That's why they try to prevent "runaway" grand juries.
8 posted on 10/30/2012 7:27:33 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Thank you for the info.


9 posted on 10/30/2012 7:29:33 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas
Well, Manning set the comedy stage, and now Klayman will be the butt of all the jokes...

Too bad this wasn't done by a real DA and a real grand jury...

After this clown act, the leaking of classified info by Øbozo will forever be considered comedy...

:-(

10 posted on 10/30/2012 7:32:07 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Should be posted under humor. He’ll be lucky if he stays out of jail on this stunt.


11 posted on 10/30/2012 7:34:01 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

silly


12 posted on 10/30/2012 7:34:38 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

FYI Phone # PING.


13 posted on 10/30/2012 7:35:51 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pwatson
Too bad, Larry has fallen in with the Common Law, the IRS is not legal non elected lets form our own grand jury nuts.

The problem is....the current system abounds with moral hazard and rewards misconduct, as when a convicted rapist seeks court-imposed visitation with the child conceived of his crime, and the U.S. Supreme Court hears the case.

Which system is further adrift?

14 posted on 10/30/2012 7:40:30 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Read the whole thing at the website. It is quite informative.

Antonin Scalia effectively codified the unique independent power of the Fourth Branch into the hands of all citizens sitting as federal grand jurors. In discussing that power and unique independence granted to the grand jury, the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), Justice Scalia, delivering the opinion of the court, laid down the law of the land:

“‘[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,” Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It “`is a constitutional fixture in its own right.’” United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). ‘ “

http://harmonyhealth.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/grand-jury-is-the-4th-branch-of-our-government-start-one-today/


15 posted on 10/30/2012 7:51:29 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

PING!!!


16 posted on 10/30/2012 7:53:02 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas
“A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens’ Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.”

After all these years of Obama crimes dating back to his birth in Kenya we have finally been able to indict Obama and even Biden!

Congratulations to the brave citizens of the Citizens’ Grand Jury. I will pray for each of them and hope they are safe and have taken measures to protect themselves from the Regime and its storm troopers.

I would have loved to see Obama’s face when he was told that he had been indicted by the all powerful Citizens’ Grand Jury.

17 posted on 10/30/2012 7:53:20 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas
O.K., Larry, since a Citizens Grand Jury has indicted maybe a member of that august body will perform a citizens arrest on them and clamp on the old bracelets.

Go for it, Larry, there's lots of folks behind you, wayyy behind you, so far behind you they're out of sight!

18 posted on 10/30/2012 7:59:24 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pwatson

You mean this IRS???

Look at the corporate info I found at the Delaware Secretary of State website:

INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation Incorporation date 7/12/33 File No. 0325720

FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (Federal Reserve)
Non-profit Delaware Corporation Incorporation date 9/13/14 File No. 0042817

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY INC. (CIA)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation Incorporation Date 3/9/83 File No. 2004409

background info: Transfers: With the National Security Council to the Executive Office of the President by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1949, effective August 20, 1949; to independent agency status by EO 12333, December 4, 1981.

Central Intelligence Group established under the National Intelligence Authority by Presidential directive, January 22, 1946, to plan and coordinate foreign intelligence activities. By National Intelligence Authority Directive 4, April 2, 1946, NIA assumed supervision of the SSU dissolution during spring and summer 1946, assigning some components to Central Intelligence Group at request of Director of Central Intelligence, and effecting incorporation of the remaining units into other War Department organizations. SSU officially abolished by General Order 16, SSU, October 19, 1946. Central Intelligence Group and National Intelligence Authority abolished by National Security Act, which created the CIA, 1947. SEE 263.1.

FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITION CORP
For-profit General Delaware Corporation Incorporation Date 8/22/80 File No. 0897960

RTC COMMERCIAL ASSETS TRUST 1995-NP3-2
For-profit Delaware Statutory Trust Incorporation Date 10/24/95 File No. 2554768

SOCIAL SECURITY CORP, DEPART. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
For-Profit General Delaware Corporation Incorporation date: 11/13/89 File No. 2213135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC
Non-profit Delaware Corporation Incorporation Date 4/19/89 File No. 2193946
http://www.state.de.us/corp/directweb.shtml

Please look at #1 at the end of the paragraph it states “click here for status on the web.” From there, at the end of the first paragraph “receive a status inquiry on line, CLICK HERE.” That takes you to ‘General Information Name Search.’)

Keep in mind - these are just the listings I could find. For example, I tracked down the Bureau of Engraving and Printing - in the state of Texas (foreign corp from the District of Columbia).


19 posted on 10/30/2012 8:00:07 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Don’t these Bozos have some sort of Sovereign Immunity? There are some exceptions to those sweeping laws, but they have a basket of authorities that hold them unaccountable from prosecution when acting in their capacity of their duties..

Something known as superior responsibility, is the doctrine of hierarchical accountability in cases of war crimes!

If that is so, why is Larry once again wasting his time?


20 posted on 10/30/2012 8:02:41 PM PDT by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: everyone

OUST THE MARXIST S.O.B.

Losing will shred his ginormous ego.

He'll NEVER recover!

Contribute to grassroots Free Republic Today!

21 posted on 10/30/2012 8:03:06 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Is this real? I’m flabbergasted. Will Obama look the other way? Can the Justice Department intervene? Will the courts throw this out as a joke?


22 posted on 10/30/2012 8:03:43 PM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: phockthis
Read the whole thing at the website. It is quite informative. Antonin Scalia effectively codified the unique independent power of the Fourth Branch into the hands of all citizens sitting as federal grand jurors.

Of course these clowns were not Federal grand jurors, but make believe grand jurors. Whose authority is similarly make believe.

23 posted on 10/30/2012 8:09:26 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mia

“Will Obama look the other way?”

How can he look the other way when he has been indicted by The Citizens’ Grand Jury and will undergo a citizen’s arrest by the Citizens’ Police and will be found guilty by a The Citizens’ Court?


24 posted on 10/30/2012 8:09:35 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Well, the media will look the other way. Just look at Bengazi. The media pretends it didn’t happen, so. . . it didn’t happen.


25 posted on 10/30/2012 8:12:14 PM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

IMMUNITY
I am sure you have heard ELECTED and APPOINTED officials say, they have immunity from prosecution for any thing they have done wrong. Prosecutors and police officers are notorious for that statement. There is a U.S. Supreme Court case that says they are liable.

George D Owen V. City of Independence, Missouri. Decided April 16, 1980.
When you look this up scroll down to 25 See, e.g., Globe 365 (remarks of Rep. Arthur) (For Owen v Independence Click (HERE)

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/casesearch.pl?court=US&CiBookMark=S-2e5e420-25379b&CiBookmarkSkipCount=-10&CiRestriction=Immunity

George M. WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David HAYSE, in his Official Capacity as Judge in Fayette
District Court, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-5382.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 1993.
E.D.Ky., No. 92-00510; Forester, J.
E.D.Ky.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Before: GUY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

George M. Wallace, a pro se Kentucky prisoner, appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d), his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Wallace’s suit was filed against Fayette County District Court Judge David Hayse. Judge Hayse was sued in his official capacity, and Wallace sought injunctive and declaratory relief. The magistrate judge’s report determined that Judge Hayse was absolutely immune from suit because the allegations of Wallace’s complaint indicated that Judge Hayse was acting in his judicial capacity. Over Wallace’s objections, the district judge determined that when a judge is performing an adjudicative function, he is absolutely immune from all suits brought pursuant to Sec. 1983. On appeal, Wallace argues that judicial immunity does not extend to Sec. 1983 suits which request injunctive and declaratory relief.

In Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522, 541-42 (1984), the court concluded “that judicial immunity is not a bar to prospective injunctive relief against a judicial officer acting in her judicial capacity.” See also Berger v. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass’n, 983 F.2d 718, 721 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2416 (1993); Sevier v. Turner, 742 F.2d 262, 269 (6th Cir.1984). Therefore, we conclude that the district court committed error when it dismissed Wallace’s suit based upon the determination that Judge Hayse enjoyed absolute immunity against Sec. 1983 suits which request injunctive and declaratory relief.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
1 F.3d 1243, Wallace v. Hayse, (C.A.6 (Ky.) 1993


26 posted on 10/30/2012 8:12:25 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

I didn’t say these guys went about it the right way...LOL

I do hope to educate as many people as to what our REAL LAW is in the hopes people will one day learn to use it


27 posted on 10/30/2012 8:15:12 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

I appreciate the legal research from the Freepers who took the time to check this out

Not sure how far this will go....but I have more respect for Larry Klayman pursuing this....than the usual PhonyCon crowd (Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, etc) who do nothing but attack those who question Obama’s Eligibility....and even attacked people like Sheriff Joe Arpaio/and his posse for proving that the Obam Birth Cert he released in 2011 was a fake.

If you are not an Obama Birther....you definitely will be an Obama Supporter. Whose side are you on?


28 posted on 10/30/2012 8:20:03 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Political maturity is realizing that the "R" next to someone's name does not mean "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

This would not be sound, even if it were issued by a real grand jury. For every piece of classified information the Government has, there is a set of people who are entitled to declassify it. The president is a member of the set, in all cases. I don’t know whether anyone else has the authority to declassify whatever he pleases, but the president can.

The whole classified information system operates under the authority of the president. In effect, all of the nation’s secrets belong to him personally. The presidency is a powerful office.

A president can even declassify things without meaning to. When Jimmy Carter blabbed some previously classified information about spy satellite capabilities, that information was automatically declassified on authority J. Carter, President of the United States. (This set off a scramble to determine what information had been declassified, and what was still classified.) I’ve never seen any indication that he did it on purpose. If anyone else had done it, it would have been a crime; for him, it wasn’t.


29 posted on 10/30/2012 8:30:56 PM PDT by Keb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

The name “Larry Klayman” is all one needs to know to determine how this will end. His specialty is PayPal law...without results


30 posted on 10/30/2012 8:32:47 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (Muppet season now open - no bag limit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Has Freedom Watch ever won a case?


31 posted on 10/30/2012 8:33:34 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Good luck with that.


32 posted on 10/30/2012 8:42:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

Somehow I just believe that these morons have/or think, they are covered by some blanket of protection, and above the Law.. Maybe not!

Nothing would please me more than they get prosecuted for some if not all of their lawlessness..


33 posted on 10/30/2012 9:20:53 PM PDT by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Obama will never see the inside of a courtroom for any reason. Like Eric Holder, he has pigmentation immunity.


34 posted on 10/30/2012 10:17:47 PM PDT by Baynative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson