Skip to comments.
Court OKs warrantless use of hidden surveillance cameras
CNET ^
| |October 30, 2012
| Declan McCullagh
Posted on 11/01/2012 5:53:48 AM PDT by Ratman83
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: Buckeye McFrog
With the US government it is across the board and spans generations of public servants.
61
posted on
11/01/2012 8:32:49 AM PDT
by
Ratman83
To: aMorePerfectUnion
62
posted on
11/01/2012 8:33:39 AM PDT
by
Ratman83
To: Ratman83
they’re not covered by the Fourth Amendment????
63
posted on
11/06/2012 2:48:03 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Ratman83
warrantless surveillance did not violate the Fourth Amendment???
64
posted on
11/06/2012 3:46:03 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: 1010RD
You must be thinking of the old US, were police served and citizens had rights.
65
posted on
11/06/2012 5:29:54 AM PST
by
Ratman83
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson