Skip to comments.
November surprise: EPA planning major post-election anti-coal regulation
The Washington Examiner ^
| 11/4/12
| Conn Carroll
Posted on 11/04/2012 8:52:44 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: markomalley
Romney’s first order of business. Fire these dick heads.
2
posted on
11/04/2012 8:55:16 AM PST
by
Roklok
To: Roklok
They must de-fund that pig ASAP. And fire the asshats therein.
3
posted on
11/04/2012 8:57:17 AM PST
by
szweig
(HYHEY!! (Have You Had Enough Yet))
To: markomalley
If you eliminate competition from "fossil fuels," "green energy" becomes economically feasible.
An economic catastrophe as well, but who cares about that?
4
posted on
11/04/2012 8:58:26 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
To: markomalley
And if we actually had real Americans in congress they would ABOLISH the EPA post haste
5
posted on
11/04/2012 8:58:36 AM PST
by
eyeamok
To: markomalley
Line them all up neath a coal conveyor belt and “scatter, smother, and cover” them with their undoing!
6
posted on
11/04/2012 8:59:22 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: markomalley
Again, I ask where does a president get the power to order this? If he wins, the takeover will be damn close to complete.
And I want to tell all the liberals standing in line with gas cans, get ready to pay $50 for 5 gallons. Can’t afford it? Then freeze to death.
7
posted on
11/04/2012 8:59:38 AM PST
by
Terry Mross
(To former friends and relatives. Don't ever contact me if you still support obama.)
To: Roklok
Firing is too lenient with these assholes...
8
posted on
11/04/2012 9:00:19 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: markomalley
When Romney wins these ba$tards will have 2-1/2 months to finish ruining the economy. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
9
posted on
11/04/2012 9:00:36 AM PST
by
anoldafvet
(One million people attended Obama's inauguration, at least 14 of them missed work)
To: markomalley
Couldn’t a super majority undo it should it be implemented?
To: markomalley
The Democrats really must enjoy destroying their electability in PA, OH, and WV.
11
posted on
11/04/2012 9:01:40 AM PST
by
Shadow44
To: markomalley
Close down the entire EPA fire every last one of these criminals and create a new agency oil, coal and nuclear friendly.
To: markomalley
Had a lady in my store last Wednesday from Oklahoma who is very active within the GOP.
She told me that The Kenyan has several EOs ready to announce on November 7th. - all concerning Environmental Protection.
Seems she is correct.
13
posted on
11/04/2012 9:02:57 AM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
To: markomalley
costly regulations that would then be very hard for a President Romney to undo.Why would it be hard for President Romney to undo? Couldn't he just nullify the new regs with an EO? At the very least, he can refuse to enforce the law, the way Obama has done with DOMA.
14
posted on
11/04/2012 9:03:07 AM PST
by
kevao
(Hey, Obama: The 1930s called, they want their economic policy back.)
To: markomalley
By killing coal they kill it for good for other uses. Look Natural Gas via Fracking and it's low price point has dramatically changed our energy mix, i.e. many Power-Plants have gone Gas because it is so cheap. Coal has gone from 44% to 39% of the Mix.
However coal to oil via the Fischer Tropsch Process can supposedly yield low sulfur Diesel "JP" fuels ideally suited for our airline fleet and our military.
This is at $25 a barrel. Now if Gas to Oil is done at an even lower pricepoint, than that is another matter that needs to be discussed.
15
posted on
11/04/2012 9:03:25 AM PST
by
taildragger
(( Fubarward Obama 2012, think about it :-) ))
To: Shadow44
This ought to put the lid on King Bozo Oilless in PA, WV and OH...that would Nail It for Mitt...
16
posted on
11/04/2012 9:04:07 AM PST
by
Shady
(Hey, King Bozo Osmocote....you can't hide the truth anymore..,)
To: markomalley
I remember during the primary debates, Rick Perry boldly stated the he would end funding to three federal agencies. Then he proceeded to name two of them, and simply could not come up with the third agency which he would boldly de-fund.
Someone helpfully suggested the EPA. Rick chucked and said "EPA, right!" and then kept trying to remember the name of the third agency. After he gave up entirely, the moderator of the debate tried to clarify: "Gov. Perry, is EPA one of the agencies?" and Perry smiled and said, "No. But I'll think of the name later."
He should have had EPA is in top three.
17
posted on
11/04/2012 9:04:49 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
To: markomalley
18
posted on
11/04/2012 9:05:28 AM PST
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: taildragger
Obama’s EPA has plans to make fracking much more expensive, also.
19
posted on
11/04/2012 9:06:35 AM PST
by
Eva
To: markomalley
Use of the word surprise here is silly. This is not surprise. If Obama wins it will simple be the expected revealing of this real agenda. If he is not, it will still be a revelation of his agenda, but in a greatly accelerated pace. So many things to screw up before January 20.
20
posted on
11/04/2012 9:09:07 AM PST
by
newheart
(The greatest trick the left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson