Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

332,754 Votes Would Have Secured a Romney Victory
Quora ^ | November 8, 2012 | Richard Tabassi

Posted on 11/08/2012 1:59:35 PM PST by CreviceTool

Ran across this on Quora: What is the minimum number of people who would have had to change their vote for Romney to have won?

Richard Tabassi, Renaissance Ape, Occasionally Witty Biped

Around 1/3 of a million in the right states. [1,2,3,4] EC 18:Ohio[1] Romney needed 103,520 people to win EC 29:Florida[2] Romney needed 50,869 people to win EC 13: Virginia[3] Romney Needed 111,985 people to win EC 6: Nevada[4] Romney Needed: 66,380 to win

Total: 332,754 to win Electoral College

There might be a combination that get him there in a shorter amount that I am not seeing yet, will update when I have time to crunch more numbers.

[1]Election results (huffingtonpost.com) Ohio [2]Election results (huffingtonpost.com) Florida [3]Election results (huffingtonpost.com) Virginia [4]Election results (huffingtonpost.com) Nevada


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electoral; romney; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Bigjimslade
think we just witnessed the democrat machine step beyond manufacturing dem votes to also destroying R votes

Easy enough to do digitally wouldn't you think?

A Spanish Company Known As Scytl Will Be Reporting Election Results For Hundreds Of U.S. Jurisdictions On Election Day From the article

In Broward County FL, the results reported by Scytl-owned SOE Software in 2008 showed an entire candidate, who was winning, disappear into vapor in the middle of the count, and in Hillsborough County FL and Dallas County TX, votes that had been reported began to disappear.

61 posted on 11/09/2012 9:12:43 PM PST by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I think what actually might have trapped ‘you know who’ was my tagline.
He actually couldn’t tell it was a gag making fun of others and he took it seriously.

OK, time for a new tag before I forget.


62 posted on 11/09/2012 9:14:04 PM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Boehner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

He called you a “moderate toadie”?!

Some people seem to be detached from reality.


63 posted on 11/12/2012 12:30:15 AM PST by Impy (Boehner for President - 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: riri

A Study of Vote Verification Technologies Part I: Technical Study (2006)
http://www.umbc.edu/mipar/Documents/Vote%20Verification%20Study%20Report%20-%20FINAL.pdf


64 posted on 11/12/2012 12:49:16 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

A Study of Vote Verification Technologies Part I: Technical Study (2006)

http://www.umbc.edu/mipar/Documents/Vote%20Verification%20Study%20Report%20-%20FINAL.pdf

“We would note that no election system – regardless of the technology involved – is foolproof nor is any election system completely immune or secure from fraud and attack. Indeed, there is a long and inglorious history of election fraud in the U.S. that involves nearly all methods and technologies of voting, especially paper voting systems. Moreover, it would be prohibitively costly to make any election totally secure.”


65 posted on 11/12/2012 12:51:42 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: thecodont; riri

Putting these all in one post. Much material to look at here.

A Study of Vote Verification Technologies Part I: Technical Study (2006)

http://www.umbc.edu/mipar/Documents/Vote%20Verification%20Study%20Report%20-%20FINAL.pdf

“We would note that no election system – regardless of the technology involved – is foolproof nor is any election system completely immune or secure from fraud and attack. Indeed, there is a long and inglorious history of election fraud in the U.S. that involves nearly all methods and technologies of voting, especially paper voting systems. Moreover, it would be prohibitively costly to make any election totally secure.”

An Examination of Vote Verification Technologies: Findings and Experiences from the Maryland Study, April 15, 2006

http://static.usenix.org/events/evt06/tech/full_papers/sherman/sherman.pdf

HP E-voting Solutions (Hewlett-Packard and SCYTL)
http://h20247.www2.hp.com/PublicSector/downloads/e_voting1.pdf

SCYTL’s involvement in French and Greek elections
http://blog.doodooecon.com/2012/06/scytl-involvement-in-french-and-greek.html

Foreign Company Buys U.S. Election Results Reporting Firm
http://www.pittsreport.com/2012/01/foreign-company-buys-u-s-election-results-reporting-firm-sorros-or-muslims/


66 posted on 11/12/2012 1:09:39 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Impy
RE :”Some people seem to be detached from reality”

Did you see how that ended for him on this thread? That comment was not very smart.

67 posted on 11/12/2012 4:44:45 AM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Bohner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; sickoflibs; cripplecreek

” You’ll never hear me giving someone grief for having not voted. I think that WAS the moral thing to do. I know I had to bend mine to back Romney, and to a certain degree, that IS immoral.”

To a very small degree, maybe. Otherwise, a very thoughtful post (as usual). Our problems, sadly, have just begun. We have a drunken coward as Speaker, and Obama has Executive Orders. A deadly combination.


68 posted on 11/13/2012 7:37:48 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker ((God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson