Posted on 11/17/2012 8:43:05 AM PST by Renfield
The lawsuit, as the article itself points out, is now not simply confined to the attention of a few internet websites, but has even come to the attention of the Wall Street Journal, but for our purposes, the murders themselves must remain center stage.
Yesterday I noted some massive discrepancies in the story of the German gold audit, the story that simply won’t go away (and you can hardly blame the Germans or the German government for wanting to know just what the hell has been going on). And in previous blogs I have pointed out that the New York Federal Reserve’s response to German inquiries has essentially been, “Go away, leave us alone, don’t bother us…it’s all there, take our word for it.” The official reason, given by the Fed, was it was protecting “security,” and I averred that the real hidden reason, was national security. I pointed out in yesterday’s blog the crucial role of the Exchange Stabilization Fund in these financial machinations, and how it functions as one part of a mechanism of a hidden, and totally unaccountable, slush fund. I am not alone in these assessments, for on occasion Catherine Austin Fitts has stated similar things.
All this suggests to my mind that these murders were not only warnings, but that in fact there may be two motivations – a financial one and a national security one – behind the tragic deed, and that the secret, to have perpetrated such a heinous crime against children, is big indeed.
And in my opinion, it is this: we are looking at a huge financial system that is totally off the books, one with deep connections to all those factions and interests I have talked about in various books, and here on this website. This huge mechanism is more than just a slush fund, it is a hidden financial system of a hidden society, or civilization… once we realize that, and just how high the stakes are for those involved in it, the sooner we will be able to abandon silly messianic notions of secret societies riding to the rescue. To be sure, the dots connect to Asia, but not to people in white hats, but to people who used to wear chrysanthemums in the lapels of their suits, and to some equally unsavory people in Europe and America. They will do anything to protect their secrets. It isn’t even ultimately the financial system and fraud they are trying to protect, but rather, what that system has been used for, and what they have done in the name of it.
$43 trillion? Math fail.
A 99%’er getting back at the 1%?
These people are very serious about keeping their largess
By the way, for those who may have missed this: The mainstream media reported that those children were murdered by their nanny, and that she then slit her own throat. However, according to the account of one of the first-responders, her throat wasn’t slit; she had been stabbed in the throat, and with enough force that the knife blade broke one of her vertabrae. She didn’t kill herself, then; she was murdered, and left for dead...the work of a professional assassin. If she manages to recover, she will be finished off before she can testify.
This is gibbering, drooling idiocy. The nanny lost her damned mind, that’s what happened. The author is a leftist moron who can’t do math.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Nonsense. Utter nonsense.
Ain’t it something ho John Corzine always manages to find his way onto suspect lists when financial fraud is involved?
No. It was correct. You perhaps were expecting the French version “largesse”....but largess is perfectly acceptable.
Dictionary definition is a bestowal of extravagant gifts for show. In our case, welfare, EBT, EITC, SNAP, TANF are are certainly what I’d call extravagant based on the services performed, only in the sense that the reward for the gift by government is a vote.
Nonsense? How? are there more sources of information you have privy to?
Kinda the opposite of a gift.
You are confusing “banks” with 99%ers, about whom my comments were directed....the ‘nanny’ was definitely NOT a ‘bank’......
As far as TARP goes, neither you nor I will ever be privy to a full accounting of who got what, for what. Count on it.
Not quite. It is “expected” that the Treasury will make money on TARP, but they haven’t yet.
The 99% got the largess?
The non-bank portions, not so much.
The alternative to TARP which is rarely talked about is the failure of major banks which would have put FDIC into a trillion dollar hole. But place of a trillion or so we have numerous Obama-spent trillions with nothing to show for it.
The notion that a "professional killer" would leave a target that vulnerable still breathing is preposterous.
There is exactly zero evidence that this was a planned assassination. Zero.
Read through that report I cited in the URL. There are a couple dozen banks who have not repaid their TARP funds. AIG made a substantial repayment in August, as I recall.
What’s really “something” is that Corzine isn’t sitting in a cell beside Bernie Madoff.
What is a ‘Bankster’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.