Posted on 11/17/2012 8:43:05 AM PST by Renfield
Remember, as dirty as he is, Obama is just the Manchurian washer-woman, laundering the cash as best he can. He is a puppet of the Banksters. This kind of stuff has been going on whenever there was a Central Bank in existence in the United States. The Federal Reserve is the latest incarnation of it, so we have (latterly) had nearly 100 years of financial fraud piled upon us. The pile is now toppling over.
Sounds good, net:net, the bank portion of TARP made the Treasury over $22 billion.
To me, the TARP program was a failure in that it prevented capitalism from actually working - punishing the stupid with failure
Stupid bankers weren't punished? Really?
Bilderbergers?
They didn't take losses. The taxpayers did.
Banks lost tens of billions. When taxpayers defaulted on their mortgages. It was in all the papers.
You didn't pay attention to post #38, did you?
I'm sorry, was my ridicule of post #38 too subtle?
Manipulating interest rates and currency for the purpose of gaining control of assets at a fraction of their real value is indeed theft.
Banks do that? It should be harder for them to lose money, if that were the case. Maybe you should call them up and let them know what you know?
You don't, by any chance, work for the Federal Reserve,do you?
I own it.
The nanny woke up.
She said she was angry about being asked to do housework.
She admitted to hurting the children but would not go as far as saying she had killed them.
No, just clumsy and impertinent.
...Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Yeah, I clumsily refuted your post.
Yeah, did you help him with that one?
Bilderbergers?
They didn't take losses. The taxpayers did.
Banks lost tens of billions. When taxpayers defaulted on their mortgages. It was in all the papers.
Well said, bankers have been taking advantage of all Americans,the 1% has nothing to do with it, it is all about corruption and greed, sadly, it crosses both party lines.
Celebrities, socialites, and some charities have been laundering their funds and spreading them among not only themselves but their elite friends too for quite some time, they are like slush funds for them, the funds don’t go where they should, look at the salaries of those who run these charities, look at where the funds go, that’s where the real story is.
Read it. The silly, stupid errors made me laugh.
Thank you so much for these insights, dearest sister in Christ!
*
It's easy to write staggering fiction.
The article looked like someone’s blog instead of a news story.
$43 Trillion. Yeah right.
The opening remarks in the title were about a man’s children being killed by a nanny juxtaposed against a lawsuit over ‘ill gotten gains’ by ‘banks’. The man, being a ‘bankster’.
Had you read my initial remark, you might have gleaned I was talking about the nanny and the ‘reason’ for the story in the first place. I don’t give a crap about the media’s version of TARP; they all lie. Likely, an immense portion of it ended up in Obama’s re-election campaign and then as “walking around money” for his voters in the form of Obama Phones, UIC extensions, TANF work relaxation of rules, etc.
No kidding, screen writers make a living at it. But for a consumer to “suspend reality” it must have some realistic ground.
No, stupid bankers were not punished.
If they had been, then Citigroup would have ceased to exist. BofA would be broken up and out of business today. Their books are packed with crap debt.
BofA obviously never did even a hint of due diligence on their acquisition of Countrywide, and that should have been their death penalty.
Playing stupid games should merit stupid prizes.
Jimmy Cayne lost $1 billion.
Not sure how much Dick Fuld lost, but it had to have been in the 9 figures.
If they had been, then Citigroup would have ceased to exist. BofA would be broken up and out of business today.
Bankers can't be punished unless their bank fails?
How much did Ken Lewis and Pandit lose?
BofA obviously never did even a hint of due diligence on their acquisition of Countrywide, and that should have been their death penalty.
They bought it because the Treasury and Fed begged them to. I agree it was stupid. And that no bank will ever do that again, no matter who asks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.