Posted on 11/19/2012 4:56:51 PM PST by Mozilla
Ah, the marvels of modern technology! Computers, Internet, mobile devices! Things that make life easier in this day and age. But … this cyber technology also can be used for evil gain too, right? Especially when it comes to elections.
As writer Daniel Greenfield posted, “Half the Democratic ground game is voter turnout. The other half is voter fraud. Voter ID would make an impact on this game, but that would be just like the ‘return of segregation’ or something.”
Take a look at these headlines:
“In Florida: Obama Got Over 99% in Broward County Precincts”
“What Luck! Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote”
“Good News: Obama Won County in Ohio with 108% Voter Registration”
“BREAKING: St. Lucie County, Florida Had 141.1% Turnout; Obama Won County”
“Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors Were Removed; Turnout Somehow ’30%’ Above Gov’t Numbers”
“Out of 175,554 registered voters, 247,713 vote cards were cast in St. Lucie County, Florida, on Tuesday”
What to make of it?
--------------
“The assault on liberty we witnessed Tuesday, as was the case in 2008, was led primarily by those on urban ‘ObamaNation Plantations,’ those who depend on what Obama calls ‘redistributive justice’ from the rest of us in order to survive,” [Mark] Alexander said. “They account for almost 60 percent of Obama’s constituents, and socialist Democrats are masters of co-opting (read: ‘buying’) their allegiance and getting them to the polls. The good news is that about 10 million fewer Obama voters showed up in 2012, despite his billion-dollar campaign.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
sfl
OK. We can try.
If we are going by that old vote-suppression ruling from the 1980s, I think that is nonsense in the general sense. Why should one mistake mean we can’t correct the mistakes of others? Ever? Isn’t that an outright invitation to fraud?
OK. We can try.
If we are going by that old vote-suppression ruling from the 1980s, I think that is nonsense in the general sense. Why should one mistake mean we can’t correct the mistakes of others? Ever? Isn’t that an outright invitation to fraud?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.