TSA Blasted for Exposing Breasts of Texas Congressman's Teen Grandniece

The New American ^ | 28 November 2012 | Alex Newman

[VitacoreVision]

The Transportation Security Administration is under heavy fire after publicly exposing the breasts of a teenage girl during its controversial “screening” procedures.

TSA Blasted for Exposing Breasts of Congressman's Teen Grandniece


The New American
28 November 2012


The Transportation Security Administration is under heavy fire after publicly exposing the breasts of a teenage girl during its controversial “screening” procedures. Of course, passengers routinely complain of TSA abuse and molestation — some 17,000 formal complaints have been lodged against the widely ridiculed and despised unconstitutional Homeland Security agency just since 2009, documents show.

The latest scandal, however, has turned into an international firestorm for the embattled bureaucracy, largely because the then-17-year-old victim was the grandniece of Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Texas). More than a few analysts noted that countless regular Americans suffer similar abuse and humiliation every single day; virtually nothing is ever done.

Now, though, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are crying foul while demanding investigations. Rights activists from across the political spectrum, meanwhile, have jumped on the opportunity to rein in the federal abuses once and for all.

According to official documents obtained by reporter Scott MacFarlane with an Atlanta TV news station, the girl was traveling to Australia on a trip with her classmates at Southwest Christian School in Texas. An internal investigation by TSA noted that after being selected for “secondary screening” and a so-called “pat-down,” which critics regularly equate with sexual molestation and assault, the screener "removed minor passenger from the corral." Yes, the report uses the word corral, defined as an enclosure or pen for domesticated animals.

The girl was not offered a “private screening,” the report noted, though passengers often prefer to be screened publicly anyway to ensure that there are witnesses to the controversial procedure in case of extraordinarily inappropriate fondling or other incidents. As the teen was enduring a “pat-down of the stomach area,” the top of her dress came loose and slipped down to her stomach, according to the internal investigation at least, revealing her breasts to everyone in the vicinity. Analysts suggested the dress had actually been pulled down, a far more plausible scenario.

Surveillance cameras caught the humiliating event on film, but TSA claimed the footage was not good enough to determine whether its screener had “properly conducted” what commentators said sounded a lot like “sexual assault.” The girl’s chaperones, according to the report, became “visibly upset” about the event and notified her parents. On the following day, her father filed a formal complaint.

The incident happened at the international airport in Los Angeles (LAX) some two years ago. However, it came to light only in recent days after journalist MacFarlane obtained the internal TSA report about the investigation using the Freedom of Information Act. When the findings were publicized, outrage quickly ensued.

News of the scandal has since gone viral, attracting headlines across America and beyond. Major press outlets from the United Kingdom to Iran have also covered the resulting uproar. Meanwhile, countless victims of TSA abuses took the opportunity to vent their fury in online comment sections over the lawless but routine violations of the rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

Rep. Hall, describing the incident as “brutal” and saying his grandniece had been “badly mistreated,” called on the TSA to fire the screener responsible for exposing his relative’s body at the airport. The 17-term congressman from Texas is also seeking a proper federal investigation of the incident, according to news reports.

“We have no desire to revive a painful event of the past, one that we abandoned any effort for litigation for privacy reasons,” Hall said in a statement quoted in the press. “We did not want to hurt our niece any more than she had already been hurt.”

Other lawmakers have also entered the fray. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), for example, contacted the massive screening bureaucracy to ask for a review and to express concerns about “potentially invasive screenings.” Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters of California, whose district includes LAX, also complained to TSA about the suffering and humiliation endured by her colleague’s young relative.

It is also not the first time lawmakers have had unpleasant experiences with the TSA. Earlier this year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) missed a flight to Washington, D.C., after being detained by screeners for refusing a full-body pat-down. The incident happened at the Nashville, Tennessee, airport when a so-called “naked-body scanner” found some sort of alleged “anomaly” around the conservative senator’s knee.

Sen. Paul’s father Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a hero to millions of Americans for his devotion to liberty and the Constitution, has been a foe of the TSA and its lawless abuses from the start. “Why is the TSA permitted to abuse the rights of any American traveling by air?” the congressman wondered in his farewell address this month. “Victims of TSA excesses never consented to this abuse.”

Last year, meanwhile, a congressional report determined that despite squandering close to $60 billion in taxpayer funds on the TSA, screening is based on “theatrics” and has failed to catch a single terrorist. Passengers and crew, the investigation found, are actually the most effective line of defense. Ironically, perhaps, the explosive report said air travel is no safer now than it was before September 11, 2001.

The out-of-control agency has become “an enormous, inflexible and distracted bureaucracy, more concerned with human resource management and consolidating power,” according to the report, released in November of 2011. “Today, TSA's screening policies are based in theatrics. They are typical, bureaucratic responses to failed security policies meant to assuage the concerns of the traveling public.”

This week, a stinging investigation by Charles Kenny, a fellow at the Center for Global Development and the New America Foundation, found that the TSA actually makes air travel less safe. Still, despite the facts and the growing surge of public revulsion, the Department of Homeland Security continues purporting to usurp new powers for itself, with the TSA still seeking to expand its “mission” far beyond the confines of “corrals” at airport terminals.

In typical fashion, the widely loathed screening agency attempted to blame the teenage victim after the latest scandal exploded into the global press, claiming the girl’s dress being too loose was the problem — not the molestation. “We regret that the incident of more than two years ago was one that caused embarrassment to the young lady; however, an investigation concluded that the event was accidental,” TSA claimed in a statement cited in media reports.

According to the official report about the internal investigation, the bureaucrat responsible for disrobing the girl was “counseled on the expectation of our agency for professionalism and customer service.” By “customers,” TSA was presumably referring to its hapless victims who are lawlessly forced to submit to the violation of their rights in order to board an airplane, and more recently, sometimes even a bus or train.

Aside from the wanton violations of Americans’ constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable rights, the TSA has also refused to respect federal court decisions. In August, for instance, a U.S. appeals court demanded that the agency promptly explain its brazen failure to obey the law and a judicial order issued a year earlier.

With Americans across the political spectrum becoming increasingly outraged by TSA abuses, some state lawmakers are taking action. In Texas, for example, a bill to criminalize the “screening” procedures as sexual assault was passed overwhelmingly as Democrats and Republicans united to protect the rights of Texans.

Now, the celebrated Texas Travel Freedoom Act, HB 80, recently pre-filed by state Rep. David Simpson, aims to put an end to TSA lawlessness in the Lone Star State once and for all. Activists, however, are hoping to end the abuses nationwide, and with a congressman’s grandniece becoming the latest high-profile victim, analysts say achieving that goal just got a big boost. Indeed, the entire unconstitutional Department of Homeland Security is increasingly in the crosshairs, too.


Related articles:


TSA Makes Travel More Dangerous

Court Orders TSA to Explain Lawless Use of Naked Body Scanners

Texas Bills Would Nullify NDAA's Indefinite Detention, TSA's Intrusive Screening

TSA: Airports Are Only the Beginning

More Lawmakers Demand TSA Probe

Congressional Report: TSA Useless Despite $60 Billion

Getting Rich from the TSA Naked-Body Scanners

Theft, Pedophilia, Murder Among TSA Employees’ Crimes

Sen. Rand Paul Blocked from Flight for Refusing TSA Groping

TSA Agents Charged With Grand Larceny

TSA Policies May Desensitize Children to Sexual Abuse

Grandma, 84, Strip Searched by TSA, Says U.S. in “Big Trouble”

The TSA and Its Whole-body Scanning

Report: Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List

Texas Officials Groped by TSA As Anti-Groping Bill Makes Comeback

[SaraJohnson]

Jan the Man TSA pervert alert! Homeland inSecurity should be famous for it’s sexual pervert harassment policies and lawsuits.

[theBuckwheat]

Let us not forget that we assured by Senator Charles Schumer (D, NY) that should Congress approve of federalizing the previously private security screeners, that they would be “more professional”.

Yes, they act like professional thugs. And it appears that TSA management wants it that way given how few complaints are accepted.

[varyouga]

Air marshals are useless against a suicide bomber with a few ounces of high explosive. A bomb the size of a white-out bottle can bring down an airliner under the right circumstances. A bomb several times larger most definitely will.

I too hate the invasive searches but we face a quandary with public airliners. It only takes one fool with a package that can fit inside a shoe to bring one down.

IMO, they need to focus more on systems that scan to only detect explosives rather than showing every single physical object on one’s body or bag. It can easily be done for bags but scanning people is another story.

Also, more profiling. Not simply for appearance, but mainly how a person responds to simple questions. The Israelis for example simply ask “name, origin and destination?” while holding your ID and boarding pass. If you hesitate or give the wrong information to such a simple question, they check you further.

[PAR35]

Hypocritical congressmen. No complaints unless it’s one of their own that suffers.

[Terry Mross]

I vow not to fly again, either. ANYONE I want to see or ANYTHING I want to do is within driving distance.

[VitacoreVision]

The sad part is that Rep. Ralph Hall supported the "Homeland Security Act," which created the TSA.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll367.xml

Awesome job Rep. Ralph Hall!

[soupbone1]

The soft tyranny continues with hardly any complaints. Perhaps there will be some action when the TSA starts searching bus and train passengers. Wait a minute they have already done that. Maybe when the TSA has checkpoints on the major interstates then we’ll see some resistance. On the other hand I believe the incremental removal of freedoms will go on unabated.

[Grams A]

I used to travel every week on Southwest which is my preferred airline but haven’t flown anywhere for the last two years. Received a “we miss you” email from Southwest and told them I’d return when TSA was gone. Sent copy to everyone on their board and airport managers everywhere in Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Arizona which are serviced by Southwest. Our family drives everywhere on business and for pleasure or we don’t go. Makes for some very long trips but I refuse to be a participant in their gropeathon and thuggery.

[PieterCasparzen]

ditto.

[mrsmel]

Same here. I never liked flying anyway, the sexual assault “safety” procedures just cinched it. Not being a male who appears Muslim, I’d be a likely target for intrusive “security” measures. This is one of the many ways political correctness is eroding our freedom.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Grope & tell.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Oh! I thought it was a pet-down!

[HiTech RedNeck]

It is also not the first time lawmakers have had unpleasant experiences with the TSA. Earlier this year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) missed a flight to Washington, D.C., after being detained by screeners for refusing a full-body pat-down. The incident happened at the Nashville, Tennessee, airport when a so-called “naked-body scanner” found some sort of alleged “anomaly” around the conservative senator’s knee.

Aaaaaaaand, of course, the follow up is not to look at the bare knee. That would be way too common sense.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Thank you for the TSA, GW Bush. What a wonderful thing you gave us.

With Conservatives like Baby Bush, who needs enemies?

[jurroppi1]

I have always said that they make laws when tragedy befalls them much quicker than when the plebs are forced to suffer the same fate for usually a much longer period of time.

Egregious violations like this go on until someone that matters (political elites) are forced to deal with the consequences of bad policy/law directly.

[EEGator]

You’re going to love Jeb in 2016.

[Isabel C.]

C'mon.

Pictures. Now.

Or it didn't happen.

The teenager involved in this incident was only 17 years old at the time. This means that any photos or video taken while the teenager's breasts were exposed is considered child pornography. Do you really want to view child pornography?

[HiTech RedNeck]

boys will be boys, unfortunately... sometimes they need their mouth washed with soap

[Smokin' Joe]

Since this intrusive behavior has started, I vow never to board another plane except in a case of extreme emergency. My motto is: if I can’t drive there, I won’t go there.

Ditto.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

I would rather see entire 747s blown to smithereens by terrorists than to see my entire nation being marched into bondage on the excuse of terrorism.

I would rather see entire bus loads of Kindergarteners vaporized by IEDs than see my entire nation shred the constitution, and surrendered into Marxist oppression by the 51% who pay no taxes and surrender their liberty for security at breakneck pace.

Terrorist can only destroy so many people so fast. Few here few there. Far far less than die in car accidents each year. Socialism is destroying our nation and depriving us our freedom.

Much better a random terrorist gets through. Much much better we were all armed so very few random terrorists ever get through.