Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just Walk Away, Republicans
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 29, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/29/2012 12:12:39 PM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I'm having trouble coming up with a term for this. But the conventional wisdom, the groupthink, I mean, folks, I don't care where you go, and this is not a criticism. I'm actually looking at this in wonderment. I don't care where you go. It could be a left-wing blog or right-wing blog, a left-wing magazine, a right-wing magazine, a left-wing newspaper, right-wing newspaper, they're all analyzing these negotiations in the same way: Can Obama prevail over the Republicans? Do the Republicans have any leverage? Are the Republicans going to get entitlement reform? Will there be any serious tax reform? Will there be any serious spending cuts?

originalAll of that is just bunk. It's not real. That's not what's happening. In the leverage that the Republicans have? "That's right, Mr. Limbaugh, the Republicans have leverage that they don't even know they have, because Obama doesn't want that second term recession. They need to call his bluff. They don't dare cave on this because Obama does not want to be saddled with a second term recession." I don't think he cared about the first term recession. And besides, an Obama recession is never gonna be called a recession. The people who write the history are Obama's friends. Whatever happens economically: 399,000 unemployment claims is good news, and 7.9, 8.2% unemployment, not a problem.

Would somebody explain to me how the people who elected Obama, who support Obama, who love Obama in the media, in the universities, who write the history, are going to write anything critical of the guy no matter what happens? Even if there is a second term recession, you're gonna need a telescope to find it reported, just like you need a telescope to find Oprah's network now. It won't be reported as a recession. So what is the leverage that the Republicans have? To my mind the only leverage they've got is to walk away from this, to stop playing, to stop talking, to stop playing this game.

The Republicans lost. Now, they still control the House of Representatives. Boehner still runs the show there. But the only leverage that I can see that they've got is to back out of this and make sure that whatever happens, they don't have any fingerprints on it. I know what you're saying, and you'd be right. You're saying, "But, Rush, but, Rush, no matter what the Republicans do, they're gonna get blamed for it." Yes, totally true. No matter what happens. If there is a reported recession, in fact, it will be said to be the Republicans in the House fault. No matter what happens, that's going to be said, and no matter what happens, as we sit here now, the American people, the majority of whom, are gonna believe that.

So back out of this and make sure you don't have any fingerprints on this at all. "But, Rush, but, Rush, aren't your fingerprints going to be on it if you back out? Couldn't the case be made that Republicans backing out and letting Obama have his way is, in effect, allowing this transformation to happen, can't you say there would be fingerprints there?" Yes. But I'm telling you there's another aspect to this that Obama is attempting to pull off here, and if the Republicans aren't careful, it's going to happen. Not only is he not worried about a recession in the second term, 'cause even if there is one, it will not be reported as such.

Part of Obama's transformation of America is wiping out the Republican Party. And anyone who fails to understand that that is also part of Obama's agenda at this moment, anybody who fails to understand that is really not paying attention and is too caught up in traditional conventional wisdom about, "Well, it was just another election. Well, yes, Obama won. Yes, we marshaled our forces, but we need to stand for pro-growth policies and all that rotgut." Yes, we do. There's no way we're ever gonna be tied to pro-growth policies if our fingerprints are on this coming disaster.

Folks, let me raise another point here with you, talking about how to stave this off. Let me give you some words that are never associated with current Republican leaders. And this is not personal criticism either; simply a recitation of reality as we sit here today. You will never hear these words said about or associated with any current Republican leader: clever, brilliant, masterful, feared, charismatic. All of those words are applied to the Democrats. Every one of those words is applied to Obama. There isn't room in the media narrative for any of those words to be attached to a Republican leader.

In other words, let's say we wanted to engage. Let's say we wanted to just roll up the sleeves and get in the mud with all these Democrats and really try to stop them dead in their tracks. Would somebody point to me the Republican who can do that by virtue of evidence. And again, not criticism. I don't want anybody calling anybody's office and saying I'm calling people cowards. I'm not doing that at all. I'm simply assessing the situation as it exists and if the motivation, if the objective is to strike a deal, we're finished, because it isn't going to be a deal advantageous to us.

Those cards were taken off the table on Election Day. The best thing to do is back out of this and let Obama and the Democrats have it and do what they gotta do. 'Cause that's gonna happen anyway. I don't know about you, but I don't want my fingerprints on this.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, don't misunderstand me, ladies and gentlemen. I'm not coming up here with a partisan strategy that's based only on partisan concerns for the Republicans. I think if you want to call Obama's bluff -- if that's what you really believe, if there are people who think that Obama will not go where he wants to go unless he has Republican fingerprints -- then don't give him any. If you believe the Republicans truly have leverage, then use it.

And the way you use it is making sure that as far as Obama's concerned, he doesn't have any assistance in taking this country over the cliff, that that's all him. That's my only point here. And let's find out. Let's find out real fast.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Usagi_yo

[ Romney didn’t lose because of fraud. ]

Not entirely from fraud.. but mostly from fraud..
Fraud in a hundred ways... Obama is in fact a fraud..
Voting fraud is only one vector.. aided by lieing and minions of every stripe..

The entire democrat party is a fraud.. Obama is just one of the players..
Democracy is a fraud.. no democracy has ever been democratic.. it is a lie..
Democracy was, is, and will remain a lie.. it is Mob Rule by mobsters..

To say the democrats OVERLOOKED voter fraud is a stretch..
Democrats have been performing voter fraud for many decades.. its not NEW..

This election voter fraud reached massive proportions.. in some localities..

Thats not say Romney himself is not a fraud.. they don’t call him MYTH for nothing..
He is a liberal and not conservative at all.. that is a MYTH..


41 posted on 11/29/2012 2:10:09 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I am all for jumping off the cliff. At least that way we all share the pain. These free loading masses get a $2200 tax increase. That is wonderful. And cuts to military are fine. Shut down 50 over seas bases. I could care less. and at least we reduce entitlements. The answer is jump of the cliff!!


42 posted on 11/29/2012 2:10:22 PM PST by willowdean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

by the way.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2LwnmbdiTg&feature=em-share_video_user


43 posted on 11/29/2012 2:11:42 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Wouldn’t the vote require a majority of the House to pass?


44 posted on 11/29/2012 2:24:38 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

majority of a quorum.


45 posted on 11/29/2012 2:46:33 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Let me amend my earlier reply. It is a majority of those voting if a quorum is present, so it doesn’t even require a majority of a quorum.


46 posted on 11/29/2012 2:48:46 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson