Every id10t whining about “takers”, Moochers, and/or ‘the 47%’ *is* part of the problem. no matter what, regardless of circumstances, when a person or group starts making blanket statements about large chunks of the popultion they are more of a problem than what they are whining about.
What I like about this statement is that It never, ever applies to Leftist. Evil always prevails with them no matter how much we try to avoid gernaralized statements. They will accuse of doing it anyway by picking out a new word and saying we are using a dog whistle like Rev. Al did on TV or get George Stephonopolis to ask about birth control (even though no one said anything) in primary debate to get the leftist template going. And the irony of all this is that the left gets us with their own stupid generalized statements. We use to call this demogaging.
I can understand bitterness and resentment right after losing an election, as we see here, but a POTUS candidate doing it while running for POTUS is arrogant and stupid, and his assuming he wouldnt be secretly recorded in this day and age is double stupid.
Another thing, after the first debate where is now looks like O was holding back RINO Sununu (part of the Romney campaign) goes to the MSM in an interview and arrogantly rips O’s lack of debating skills and rips him down personally calling him lazy, disengaged and incompetent. While this is (fun) party talk for AM talk radio host, a member of a POTUS campaign acting so arrogant just demeans the campaign and causes nothing but trouble.
sad but true.
didn't somebody tell Romney that one?
See, Preibus should have been on top of right off the bat ~ not just sending out a team to edumacate the Senate candidates, but also the pomposity running for present!